polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 13
th, 2014 at 3:03pm:
I always found the Dorothy Dixer questions completely demeaning to the backbencher made to ask it. Can you imagine someone like Kevin Rudd standing up and asking one while he was on the backbench? And then there's the condescending way they minister answers it - "I thank the member for x for their question, and I know what an important issue this is for the honourable member... blah blah blah".
Question time can be useful though - for example yesterday when Fiona Nash was forced to acknowledge the clear conflict of interest of her chief of staff. All because of a question asked by Penny Wong.
Question Time is a complete farce. THIS IS WHAT THE PROCEDURE IS.
The Minister's Staff calls the Departmental Ministerial Liaison Officer/s at almost daybreak when Parliament is Sitting and requests a "reply to "blah blah" in the news this morning" or whatever the MSM has "leaked". The Ministerial LO creates a Potential Parliamentary Question (ppq) and a reply (stating FACTS), signed off by the Departmental Head, and sends it off to the Minister's Office. In my day it was via fax. No idea what they do now.
There is a time limit as Question Time begins at 2pm. If I recall it was midday. Often people (at both ends) running around like headless chooks. Long hours, lots of hassles and boring in the extreme. Been there, done that. One side of The House asks the Question, the other side Answers. Basic stuff.
Not all PPQs get breath in QT, but many do.
Ministers would be absolutely lost without their Ministerial staff and those of their Department responsibilities. Do you really think these blokes have all this information in their head?
Question Time is purely a "stage" for Ministers to "perform" in front of the TV audience. It is NOT the Ministers debating anything .... that comes after the ABC stops televising Question Time ... if you really want to see what Parliament is all about, watch it for the entire day (you can do this via your computer, amazingly enough) ... or listen to it on the radio. Ditto when the Senate is sitting. It isn't much less of a bun-fight, but they do "debate" in the HOR, if you are at all interested. Not just the snippets on ABC News. That's what we voted them to do, isn't it? To
Govern and get both sides of the story .... Not to just ask Dorothy Dixers.
All Question Time does is cause the Public to take sides ... IF they can be bothered listening to Pollies carrying on like primary school kids. It does NOT solve a thing. It is for your (and the Hon Members) amusement.
You are welcome to my information.
If anyone here should have more current information, go ahead, but what I have said was Parliamentary procedure back when I was a Ministerial Liaison Officer.