Quote:havent seen it yet??... but I believe in a fair go.. so will let you know all in good time.... I did think slipper did a good job.. just didnt believe in him thats all..as for anyone else they were always on their own side.. and if anyone thinks different then thats up to them.. n ot for me to say.
Gawd....why comment on something you have not seen?
WHERE HAVE I MENTIONED BRONWYN????.....I WAS COMMENTING ON THE RIDICULOUS CLAIM THAT THE LIBS SHOULDNT BE ALLOWED TO ASK THEIR OWN SIDE QUESTIONS.. Quote:you for starters have many opinions on many subjects.... you do always without doubt think you are RIGHT.... no matter what the subject
What sort of nutter would I be if I posted something I did not believe was 'right,' or appropriate, or relevant? Do you post stuff you know is poo, cods?
I WAS REFERRING TO YOU DESPERATION IN PROVING THEM WRONG.,., LIKE WHEN YOU WENT THROUGH ALL MY POSTS ON THOMO TO FIND WHERE I HADNT USED THE PHRASE ALLEGED...AS IF YOU ARE THE BOARD POLICE.. I LAUGHED AND LAUGHED.. Quote:what you dont like is anyone to disagree with you.. probably why you started your own forum....nothing quite like being in control is there? Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
I'm quite happy for anyone to disagree with me, and that happens often enough. What is the 'forum' you are referring to?
GO BACK TO ANY FORUM WHERE THE LAW IS BROUGHT INTO IT.. LIKE RAPE/OR MURDER/ THE LATEST BEING..DANIEL MORECOMBE TRIAL..YOU SOUND VERY MUCH ON THE ACCUSEDS SIDE.. AND BUGGER THE VICTIMS SIDE.. Quote:if you were in the least genuine you would agree that nothing has changed.. its just that you are on the side where they have no come back.. just where the libs have been for 6 years..
I'll ignore that cods, given you say you have not seen QT under Bronwyn's Speakership.
Quote:its one of the frustrations of being in opposition..
the govt has the whip.
Yeas that is true, and it is also true that the non rusted on people who watch draw conclusions about the manner in which their tax dollars are spent, and QT seems now to have become a total waste of time. No need to have it.
It did work under Gillard/Rudd because they did not have the numbers to run rough shod over the House. I've not looked, but I'll bet there have been more gag motions under Abbott's House in its first few months than there were in all of the term of the Gillard Rudd House.