Australian Politics Forum - Rain To Drown Abbott …. 's Drought Parade

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: Rain To Drown Abbott …. 's Drought Parade
Reply #30 - Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:55am

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:40am:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:24am:

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:16am:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:53am:

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:48am:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:42am:

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:39am:

Swagman wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:30am:

Well well positive climate change.....who would have thought that could happen?

What, rain?

In a hotter, wetter world due to human activity, what did you expect?

So anthropomorphic caused climate change will increase rainfall and reduce droughts and the need for drought assistance?

Excellent, here's me thinking it was bad thing

Where did you hear that from … hard right shock jock?

From you, ya dill, you said it Grin

If the world is wetter, it will, by virtue of that wettness will be less droughty; you do realise that a wetter world means it is less dry and less droughty, don't you?

Or does wetter mean something else where you come from.

Unfortunately your trying to add one and one, you came to the wrong total.
Playing dumb really suits you and your posts.

Just admit you are a moron and we can all have a good laugh at your massive bugger up and move on.

Or are you going to just ignore what you posted and pretend you didn't actually write that little nugget of stupidity? Grin

As has been said many times, a hotter and wetter world will increase the extremes at both ends. I understand your ignorance considering your refutal of the science behind AGW.

I understand that by trying to trivalize this major threat is the only tool the denialists have and this is done for political reasons … to avoid logical discussion … since the denialists are void of logical points on topic. And a rational debate on how Australia should prepare for AGW effects is the fear of the deniars since this would include the reduction in the use of fossil fuels.

And we all know the biggest backers of AGW denialism is the fossil fuel sector.

I hope you are being paid well … or are you one of the mugs the fossil fuel sector are using?

I haven't denied anything, so you can retract that accusation if you want, because it is a smacking lie

I have however pointed out that a wetter world would be less droughty and that can only be a good thing. a tropical paradise if you will. Since I live in the tropics, I can tell you it is pretty good.

You fvked up (yet again), you only have to regurgiate what the greens party tells you to say, so try to 'keep on message' in future. Grin

The message is droughts, so not wetter but dryer.

Back to top

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Rain To Drown Abbott …. 's Drought Parade
Reply #31 - Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:57am

olde.sault wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:41am:

Swagman wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:30am:

Well well positive climate change.....who would have thought that could happen?

About the fraudulent global warming industry.

How do this vermin explain the terrible icy conditions in the US at present?

Some scientists are more afraid of the return of the ice age which wold be far more deadly.

Seems some people, especially sham scientists have little to do but open their mouths.

The warming at the north pole decreases the differenctial in air temps and so the cold air at the pole travels further south.

Back to top

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Rain To Drown Abbott …. 's Drought Parade
Reply #32 - Feb 14^th, 2014 at 10:02am

FriYAY wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:44am:

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:40am:

I understand that by trying to trivalize this major threat

Your OP trivializes it more than anything else written here.... Roll Eyes

It trivalises conservatives who are reacting to the effects of AGW by trying to pretend the world hasn't changed because of AGW.

Rather than patch … areas of Australia that are/will not be suitable for agriculture in the next few decades should not be subsidised.

They should be redirected into activities that are better suited for the new conditions.

Back to top

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Rain To Drown Abbott …. 's Drought Parade
Reply #33 - Feb 14^th, 2014 at 10:05am

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:51am:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:48am:

FriYAY wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:35am:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:18am:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:13am:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:07am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:03am:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:58am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:52am:

Didn't that fraud Flannery say it would never rain again enough to fill the dams? HAHAHAHA!!!

No, Australian of the Year and eminent scientist Dr Flannery did not say that.

Want to take that back before I prove you wrong?

Flannery never said, it would "never rain again enough to fill dams" from this point on, you blithering fool.

You do realise that when someone does not use direct quotes, they are allowed to paraphrase what was said; so arguing the it was not a direct quote, when it was very obviously not one, is a bit (a lot) foolish, don't you think?

The statement was not a direct quote, don't carry on like a loon and pretend it was.

Like all deniers, he paraphrased enough to take it completely out of context.

There is nothing wrong with Flannery's comment. We see the inability for run-off to fill dams to sustain farming in most of the central region of Australia due to the climate in that region. Climate change is predicting some parts of our current farmland will become like that. (ie not enough run-off to fill dams).
The key thing is, its not now, its in the future.

How can he be "proved wrong" when his prediction date hasnt arrived yet ?

Denier logic is not logic at all. Its lies built on lies.

Dams in the central region of Australia!!!

What are the names of these dams in the central regions of Australia?

As for the climate “in that region” (desert) you may have missed it but the flooding rains a few years back, filled Lake Eyre, a few times.

And it’s raining there now, inches and inches of rain.

Cool

Am I dealing with a moron here ?

Is farming sustainable in central Australia ?

Heard of the Goyder's line ?

Go ask the Israeli's. They turned arid desert into very productive land - something the Palestinians failed to do for hundreds of years.

JERUSALEM, February 13, 2014 (WAFA) – The Israeli human rights group, B’Tselem, said Wednesday that Israel does discriminate in water allocation between Palestinians and Israelis and that Palestinians get much less water than Israelis.

B’Tselem was responding to allegations by Israeli officials that there was no discrimination in water allocations as claimed by the president of the European Parliament, Martin Schulz, during a speech he made at the Israeli parliament, the Knesset.

Israelis interrupted Schulz and walked out of the building when he said Palestinians get much less water than Israelis.

http://english.wafa.ps/index.php?action=detail&id=24335

Back to top

IP Logged

Bam

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male

Re: Rain To Drown Abbott …. 's Drought Parade
Reply #34 - Feb 14^th, 2014 at 10:05am

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:42am:

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:39am:

Swagman wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:30am:

Well well positive climate change.....who would have thought that could happen?

What, rain?

In a hotter, wetter world due to human activity, what did you expect?

So anthropomorphic caused climate change will increase rainfall and reduce droughts and the need for drought assistance?

Excellent, here's me thinking it was bad thing

anthropomorphic. PMSL. I think you mean anthropogenic?

On your question, what is likely to happen is more variability. You can deny or accept anthropogenic causes, but that's not important for my point. What is important is risk mitigation.

Back to top

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.

IP Logged

Bam Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21905 Gender:	Re: Rain To Drown Abbott …. 's Drought Parade Reply #35 - Feb 14^th, 2014 at 10:08am Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:52am: Didn't that fraud Flannery say it would never rain again enough to fill the dams? HAHAHAHA!!! Citation needed.
Back to top	You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument. IP Logged

FriYAY

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7395

Re: Rain To Drown Abbott …. 's Drought Parade
Reply #36 - Feb 14^th, 2014 at 10:10am

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:48am:

FriYAY wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:35am:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:18am:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:13am:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:07am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:03am:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:58am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:52am:

Didn't that fraud Flannery say it would never rain again enough to fill the dams? HAHAHAHA!!!

No, Australian of the Year and eminent scientist Dr Flannery did not say that.

Want to take that back before I prove you wrong?

Flannery never said, it would "never rain again enough to fill dams" from this point on, you blithering fool.

You do realise that when someone does not use direct quotes, they are allowed to paraphrase what was said; so arguing the it was not a direct quote, when it was very obviously not one, is a bit (a lot) foolish, don't you think?

The statement was not a direct quote, don't carry on like a loon and pretend it was.

Like all deniers, he paraphrased enough to take it completely out of context.

There is nothing wrong with Flannery's comment. We see the inability for run-off to fill dams to sustain farming in most of the central region of Australia due to the climate in that region. Climate change is predicting some parts of our current farmland will become like that. (ie not enough run-off to fill dams).
The key thing is, its not now, its in the future.

How can he be "proved wrong" when his prediction date hasnt arrived yet ?

Denier logic is not logic at all. Its lies built on lies.

Dams in the central region of Australia!!!

What are the names of these dams in the central regions of Australia?

As for the climate “in that region” (desert) you may have missed it but the flooding rains a few years back, filled Lake Eyre, a few times.

And it’s raining there now, inches and inches of rain.

Cool

Am I dealing with a moron here ?

Is farming sustainable in central Australia ?

Heard of the Goyder's line ?

Well your dealing with your self so I’d say yep.

Yes, yes we went through the Goyder line the other day.

You change tack so fast you should be skippering in the America’s Cup!!

Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

Armchair_Politician Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 26104 Gender:	Re: Rain To Drown Abbott …. 's Drought Parade Reply #37 - Feb 14^th, 2014 at 10:13am Bam wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 10:08am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:52am: Didn't that fraud Flannery say it would never rain again enough to fill the dams? HAHAHAHA!!! Citation needed. Provided...
Back to top	IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: Rain To Drown Abbott …. 's Drought Parade
Reply #38 - Feb 14^th, 2014 at 10:18am

Bam wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 10:05am:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:42am:

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:39am:

Swagman wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:30am:

Well well positive climate change.....who would have thought that could happen?

What, rain?

In a hotter, wetter world due to human activity, what did you expect?

So anthropomorphic caused climate change will increase rainfall and reduce droughts and the need for drought assistance?

Excellent, here's me thinking it was bad thing

anthropomorphic. PMSL. I think you mean anthropogenic?

On your question, what is likely to happen is more variability. You can deny or accept anthropogenic causes, but that's not important for my point. What is important is risk mitigation.

My bad

And my question was retorical.

If anthropogenc climate change , now makes for a wetter Australia, according to greens, then no biggie, unless of course his statement is total horse sh1t. Im betting on the later.

Back to top

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Rain To Drown Abbott …. 's Drought Parade
Reply #39 - Feb 14^th, 2014 at 10:20am

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:55am:

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:40am:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:24am:

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:16am:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:53am:

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:48am:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:42am:

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:39am:

Swagman wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:30am:

Well well positive climate change.....who would have thought that could happen?

What, rain?

In a hotter, wetter world due to human activity, what did you expect?

So anthropomorphic caused climate change will increase rainfall and reduce droughts and the need for drought assistance?

Excellent, here's me thinking it was bad thing

Where did you hear that from … hard right shock jock?

From you, ya dill, you said it Grin

If the world is wetter, it will, by virtue of that wettness will be less droughty; you do realise that a wetter world means it is less dry and less droughty, don't you?

Or does wetter mean something else where you come from.

Unfortunately your trying to add one and one, you came to the wrong total.
Playing dumb really suits you and your posts.

Just admit you are a moron and we can all have a good laugh at your massive bugger up and move on.

Or are you going to just ignore what you posted and pretend you didn't actually write that little nugget of stupidity? Grin

As has been said many times, a hotter and wetter world will increase the extremes at both ends. I understand your ignorance considering your refutal of the science behind AGW.

I understand that by trying to trivalize this major threat is the only tool the denialists have and this is done for political reasons … to avoid logical discussion … since the denialists are void of logical points on topic. And a rational debate on how Australia should prepare for AGW effects is the fear of the deniars since this would include the reduction in the use of fossil fuels.

And we all know the biggest backers of AGW denialism is the fossil fuel sector.

I hope you are being paid well … or are you one of the mugs the fossil fuel sector are using?

I haven't denied anything, so you can retract that accusation if you want, because it is a smacking lie

I have however pointed out that a wetter world would be less droughty and that can only be a good thing. a tropical paradise if you will. Since I live in the tropics, I can tell you it is pretty good.

You fvked up (yet again), you only have to regurgiate what the greens party tells you to say, so try to 'keep on message' in future. Grin

The message is droughts, so not wetter but dryer.

Quote:

From you, ya dill, you said it Grin

If the world is wetter, it will, by virtue of that wettness will be less droughty; you do realise that a wetter world means it is less dry and less droughty, don't you?

Or does wetter mean something else where you come from.

Your previous quote on this thread … now you are contradicting yourself. You first said I said it … now you are telling the truth finally.

Also a hotter world … with every degree increase in global temps, the rain clouds rise apx 150 meters and so are /will decrease rainfall to higher regions in Qld.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bam

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male

Re: Rain To Drown Abbott …. 's Drought Parade
Reply #40 - Feb 14^th, 2014 at 10:45am

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:09am:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:07am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:03am:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:58am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:52am:

Didn't that fraud Flannery say it would never rain again enough to fill the dams? HAHAHAHA!!!

No, Australian of the Year and eminent scientist Dr Flannery did not say that.

Want to take that back before I prove you wrong?

Flannery never said, it would "never rain again enough to fill dams" from this point on, you blithering fool.

Yeah, you just got owned! Cheesy

We will wait and see if the forecast rain does indeed prove this example wrong. Until then, it's too early to say.

It doesn't invalidate the proposition that the average rainfall figures in some regions may be significantly lower in the future. Melbourne's average rainfall in the past 20 years (1994-2013) is 10% less than the long-term average for all years (580mm vs 649.4mm) and this includes 13 years in a row where the average rainfall was below the long-term average (1997-2009). Melbourne's dams were last full in about 1996.

You can grasp at straws to deny the possibility of climate change (from any cause) all you like, but a smart person would hedge against the risk. I wouldn't mind seeing some sort of water grid being implemented, where more dams were connected by a network of pipelines. This is still worth considering regardless of climate change because droughts and floods do occur. The answer isn't more dams, the answer is smarter dams.

Back to top

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.

IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: Rain To Drown Abbott …. 's Drought Parade
Reply #41 - Feb 14^th, 2014 at 10:49am

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 10:20am:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:55am:

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:40am:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:24am:

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:16am:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:53am:

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:48am:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:42am:

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:39am:

Swagman wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:30am:

Well well positive climate change.....who would have thought that could happen?

What, rain?

In a hotter, wetter world due to human activity, what did you expect?

So anthropomorphic caused climate change will increase rainfall and reduce droughts and the need for drought assistance?

Excellent, here's me thinking it was bad thing

Where did you hear that from … hard right shock jock?

From you, ya dill, you said it Grin

If the world is wetter, it will, by virtue of that wettness will be less droughty; you do realise that a wetter world means it is less dry and less droughty, don't you?

Or does wetter mean something else where you come from.

Unfortunately your trying to add one and one, you came to the wrong total.
Playing dumb really suits you and your posts.

Just admit you are a moron and we can all have a good laugh at your massive bugger up and move on.

Or are you going to just ignore what you posted and pretend you didn't actually write that little nugget of stupidity? Grin

As has been said many times, a hotter and wetter world will increase the extremes at both ends. I understand your ignorance considering your refutal of the science behind AGW.

I understand that by trying to trivalize this major threat is the only tool the denialists have and this is done for political reasons … to avoid logical discussion … since the denialists are void of logical points on topic. And a rational debate on how Australia should prepare for AGW effects is the fear of the deniars since this would include the reduction in the use of fossil fuels.

And we all know the biggest backers of AGW denialism is the fossil fuel sector.

I hope you are being paid well … or are you one of the mugs the fossil fuel sector are using?

I haven't denied anything, so you can retract that accusation if you want, because it is a smacking lie

I have however pointed out that a wetter world would be less droughty and that can only be a good thing. a tropical paradise if you will. Since I live in the tropics, I can tell you it is pretty good.

You fvked up (yet again), you only have to regurgiate what the greens party tells you to say, so try to 'keep on message' in future. Grin

The message is droughts, so not wetter but dryer.

Quote:

From you, ya dill, you said it Grin

If the world is wetter, it will, by virtue of that wettness will be less droughty; you do realise that a wetter world means it is less dry and less droughty, don't you?

Or does wetter mean something else where you come from.

Your previous quote on this thread … now you are contradicting yourself. You first said I said it … now you are telling the truth finally.

Also a hotter world … with every degree increase in global temps, the rain clouds rise apx 150 meters and so are /will decrease rainfall to higher regions in Qld.

You know your initial statement is still attached to this thread don't you?

The rest of your post is a little more deranged that usual so Im might just not even try to work out what the bugger you are trying to say.

Back to top

IP Logged

Doctor Jolly

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3808

Re: Rain To Drown Abbott …. 's Drought Parade
Reply #42 - Feb 14^th, 2014 at 11:02am

FriYAY wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 10:10am:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:48am:

FriYAY wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:35am:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:18am:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:13am:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:07am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:03am:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:58am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:52am:

Didn't that fraud Flannery say it would never rain again enough to fill the dams? HAHAHAHA!!!

No, Australian of the Year and eminent scientist Dr Flannery did not say that.

Want to take that back before I prove you wrong?

Flannery never said, it would "never rain again enough to fill dams" from this point on, you blithering fool.

You do realise that when someone does not use direct quotes, they are allowed to paraphrase what was said; so arguing the it was not a direct quote, when it was very obviously not one, is a bit (a lot) foolish, don't you think?

The statement was not a direct quote, don't carry on like a loon and pretend it was.

Like all deniers, he paraphrased enough to take it completely out of context.

There is nothing wrong with Flannery's comment. We see the inability for run-off to fill dams to sustain farming in most of the central region of Australia due to the climate in that region. Climate change is predicting some parts of our current farmland will become like that. (ie not enough run-off to fill dams).
The key thing is, its not now, its in the future.

How can he be "proved wrong" when his prediction date hasnt arrived yet ?

Denier logic is not logic at all. Its lies built on lies.

Dams in the central region of Australia!!!

What are the names of these dams in the central regions of Australia?

As for the climate “in that region” (desert) you may have missed it but the flooding rains a few years back, filled Lake Eyre, a few times.

And it’s raining there now, inches and inches of rain.

Cool

Am I dealing with a moron here ?

Is farming sustainable in central Australia ?

Heard of the Goyder's line ?

Well your dealing with your self so I’d say yep.

Yes, yes we went through the Goyder line the other day.

You change tack so fast you should be skippering in the America’s Cup!!

Roll Eyes

providing evidence for my consistant viewpoint is not changing tack.

But I can understand if you are getting overwhelmed with information. Most deniers are, and so revert to faith based beliefs. Quite common I believe.

Back to top

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Rain To Drown Abbott …. 's Drought Parade
Reply #43 - Feb 14^th, 2014 at 11:16am

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 10:49am:

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 10:20am:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:55am:

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:40am:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:24am:

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 9:16am:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:53am:

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:48am:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:42am:

____ wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:39am:

Swagman wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:30am:

Well well positive climate change.....who would have thought that could happen?

What, rain?

In a hotter, wetter world due to human activity, what did you expect?

So anthropomorphic caused climate change will increase rainfall and reduce droughts and the need for drought assistance?

Excellent, here's me thinking it was bad thing

Where did you hear that from … hard right shock jock?

From you, ya dill, you said it Grin

If the world is wetter, it will, by virtue of that wettness will be less droughty; you do realise that a wetter world means it is less dry and less droughty, don't you?

Or does wetter mean something else where you come from.

Unfortunately your trying to add one and one, you came to the wrong total.
Playing dumb really suits you and your posts.

Just admit you are a moron and we can all have a good laugh at your massive bugger up and move on.

Or are you going to just ignore what you posted and pretend you didn't actually write that little nugget of stupidity? Grin

As has been said many times, a hotter and wetter world will increase the extremes at both ends. I understand your ignorance considering your refutal of the science behind AGW.

I understand that by trying to trivalize this major threat is the only tool the denialists have and this is done for political reasons … to avoid logical discussion … since the denialists are void of logical points on topic. And a rational debate on how Australia should prepare for AGW effects is the fear of the deniars since this would include the reduction in the use of fossil fuels.

And we all know the biggest backers of AGW denialism is the fossil fuel sector.

I hope you are being paid well … or are you one of the mugs the fossil fuel sector are using?

I haven't denied anything, so you can retract that accusation if you want, because it is a smacking lie

I have however pointed out that a wetter world would be less droughty and that can only be a good thing. a tropical paradise if you will. Since I live in the tropics, I can tell you it is pretty good.

You fvked up (yet again), you only have to regurgiate what the greens party tells you to say, so try to 'keep on message' in future. Grin

The message is droughts, so not wetter but dryer.

Quote:

From you, ya dill, you said it Grin

If the world is wetter, it will, by virtue of that wettness will be less droughty; you do realise that a wetter world means it is less dry and less droughty, don't you?

Or does wetter mean something else where you come from.

Your previous quote on this thread … now you are contradicting yourself. You first said I said it … now you are telling the truth finally.

Also a hotter world … with every degree increase in global temps, the rain clouds rise apx 150 meters and so are /will decrease rainfall to higher regions in Qld.

You know your initial statement is still attached to this thread don't you?

The rest of your post is a little more deranged that usual so Im might just not even try to work out what the bugger you are trying to say.

I was/am pointing out your error via two conflicting posts of yours.

You proved yourself as illogical.

Back to top

IP Logged

FriYAY

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7395

Re: Rain To Drown Abbott …. 's Drought Parade
Reply #44 - Feb 14^th, 2014 at 11:25am

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 11:02am:

providing evidence for my consistant viewpoint is not changing tack.

We see the inability for run-off to fill dams to sustain farming in most of the central region of Australia due to the climate in that region.

What dams?

The dams in the MDB contain, at the moment, about 11,000 billion liters, those dams?

The ones getting a nice top up now, due to the rain, those dams?

The ones that filled up about 3 years ago?

Those dams?

Back to top

IP Logged