Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Ending The Ethanal Subsidy (Read 1716 times)
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Ending The Ethanal Subsidy
Feb 14th, 2014 at 8:37am
 
THE owner of the Manildra Group Dick Honan has dismissed a report that has questioned the effectiveness of the ethanol industry as “garbage” and has warned if the federal government withdrew its support the Bomaderry plant would have to close.

The Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics (BREE) report raised concerns about the ethanol industry that receives $108 million a year from the federal government’s Ethanol Product Grant Program.

With predictions of likely cuts to come in the May budget, the report has prompted speculation the subsidy may be scrapped, meaning the ethanol industry could be the next to feel the Abbott government’s hard line on requests for assistance.

The EPG was introduced by the Howard government in 2002 but the BREE report questions the effectiveness of the scheme, saying the subsidies were producing minimal economic or environmental benefit and might even be responsible for higher costs to motorists.

Manildra’s Bomaderry plant, the biggest manufacturer of ethanol in Australia, receives the lion’s share of the subsidies.

“I’ve seen the report and it is garbage,” Mr Honan said.

“It’s a pity a tree had to be cut down to make the newsprint.”

Mr Honan has warned in the media that the Bomaderry plant would be closed if the federal government withdrew its assistance for the industry.

“It wouldn’t be viable for the renewable fuel industry in Australia if the subsidy was withdrawn,” he said.

“That was bipartisan and we don’t see any change to that.

“We’ve certainly had no communications that that will change.”

Mr Honan said Manildra’s Bomaderry plant had 300 employees, while there are also extra staff at three other locations in Gunnedah, Manildra and Narrandera, who supply raw materials for the company’s operations.

As well as producing ethanol at its Bomaderry complex, Manildra also produces a host of other products such as starch, gluten, glucose syrup and brewers’ syrup.

There has been more than $600 million in capital investment on the site in the last two decades, more than $300 million of that in the past six years.

Producing 300 million litres of ethanol a year, Manildra is the largest producer of the fuel in Australia.

The company uses wheat starch to make around 70 per cent of total Australian production.

United Petroleum’s plant in Dalby, Queensland uses red sorghum to make 80 million litres of ethanol and Wilmar Bioethanol uses molasses from sugar at Sarina, Qld to make 60 million litres.

The BREE report estimates that Australia’s three ethanol producers employ a combined workforce of 200, costing taxpayers between $545,000 and $680,000 per job.

In 2012-13, petrol sales in Australia totalled 18.7 billion litres, a decrease of 4.8 per cent from consumption levels in 2011-12.

Ethanol-blended petrol (EBP) accounted for 13.8 per cent of total petrol sales in 2012-13.

“Why should it be altered when there are 58 countries in the world with national mandates?

“The ethanol industry received 38 cents a litre excise exemption but we discount to the oil companies 47 cents, so we give back more than what we receive, how could we be taking a subsidy?”

Mr Honan said suggestions the subsidies for ethanol production may be cut were nothing more than “speculation”.

“We’ve had no correspondence from the government,” he said.

“Legislation was passed in 2011, bipartisan legislation, to extend the excise exemption on ethanol and biodiesel to 2021.


http://www.southcoastregister.com.au/story/2087481/ethanol-upset/?cs=203




Should Abbott force up cost of living transport costs for mums and dads across the country  … or will he cave and keep the tax payer support?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: Ending The Ethanal Subsidy
Reply #1 - Feb 14th, 2014 at 9:48am
 
The excise exemption should be enough.

Manildra is also a generous donor to both sides of politics.
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
bogarde73
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Anti-Global & Contra Mundum

Posts: 18443
Gender: male
Re: Ending The Ethanal Subsidy
Reply #2 - Feb 14th, 2014 at 10:10am
 
Should Abbott force up cost of living transport costs for mums and dads across the country  … or will he cave and keep the tax payer support?

Whether you like it or not, there are a lot of cuts coming in this budget to restore some stability after the Rudd/Gillard Years of Profligacy.
This sounds like an eminently suitable one.
Back to top
 

Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74634
Gender: male
Re: Ending The Ethanal Subsidy
Reply #3 - Feb 14th, 2014 at 10:16am
 
ethanol industry is subsidised about $530 000 per employee in the industry ... the dole is less than $20 000 .... where's the value for money for the taxpayer?

Not only that but subsidising the ethanol industry means cheaper imports are kept out of the market and Australian families end up paying more for their petrol

What is Abbott waiting for? Just because Howards brother runs manildra,why should taxpayers subsidise them?
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25968
Gender: male
Re: Ending The Ethanal Subsidy
Reply #4 - Feb 14th, 2014 at 10:18am
 
John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2014 at 10:16am:
ethanol industry is subsidised about $530 000 per employee in the industry ... the dole is less than $20 000 .... where's the value for money for the taxpayer?

Not only that but subsidising the ethanol industry means cheaper imports are kept out of the market and Australian families end up paying more for their petrol

What is Abbott waiting for? Just because Howards brother runs manildra,why should taxpayers subsidise them?


For once, I agree with you!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Swagman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Beware of cheap imitations......

Posts: 15095
Illawarra NSW
Gender: male
Re: Ending The Ethanal Subsidy
Reply #5 - Feb 14th, 2014 at 10:41am
 
John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2014 at 10:16am:
ethanol industry is subsidised about $530 000 per employee in the industry ... the dole is less than $20 000 .... where's the value for money for the taxpayer?

Not only that but subsidising the ethanol industry means cheaper imports are kept out of the market and Australian families end up paying more for their petrol

What is Abbott waiting for? Just because Howards brother runs manildra,why should taxpayers subsidise them?


The exorbitant cost of renewable energy.

Do you want renewables or not?


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BlOoDy RiPpEr
Gold Member
*****
Offline


aussie-patriot.com

Posts: 2475
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Ending The Ethanal Subsidy
Reply #6 - Feb 14th, 2014 at 11:26am
 
I refuse to buy ethanol, its like watered down fuel....
Back to top
 

host of the aussie-patriot.com site
WWW  
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74634
Gender: male
Re: Ending The Ethanal Subsidy
Reply #7 - Feb 14th, 2014 at 11:28am
 
Swagman wrote on Feb 14th, 2014 at 10:41am:
John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2014 at 10:16am:
ethanol industry is subsidised about $530 000 per employee in the industry ... the dole is less than $20 000 .... where's the value for money for the taxpayer?

Not only that but subsidising the ethanol industry means cheaper imports are kept out of the market and Australian families end up paying more for their petrol

What is Abbott waiting for? Just because Howards brother runs manildra,why should taxpayers subsidise them?


The exorbitant cost of renewable energy.

Do you want renewables or not?




Don't use that excuse ... we would still have ethanol with or without the subsidies ...if anything it would be cheaper without the subsidies thereby encouraging more customers to use the renewable v's the fossil fuels
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74634
Gender: male
Re: Ending The Ethanal Subsidy
Reply #8 - Feb 14th, 2014 at 11:29am
 
BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Feb 14th, 2014 at 11:26am:
I refuse to buy ethanol, its like watered down fuel....


it's not like watered down fuel, it is watered down fuel
most cars manufactured today are built to work with the ethanol based fuel .... i wouldn't put it in an old car, but the new cars are fine
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Swagman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Beware of cheap imitations......

Posts: 15095
Illawarra NSW
Gender: male
Re: Ending The Ethanal Subsidy
Reply #9 - Feb 14th, 2014 at 11:35am
 
John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2014 at 11:28am:
Swagman wrote on Feb 14th, 2014 at 10:41am:
John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2014 at 10:16am:
ethanol industry is subsidised about $530 000 per employee in the industry ... the dole is less than $20 000 .... where's the value for money for the taxpayer?

Not only that but subsidising the ethanol industry means cheaper imports are kept out of the market and Australian families end up paying more for their petrol

What is Abbott waiting for? Just because Howards brother runs manildra,why should taxpayers subsidise them?


The exorbitant cost of renewable energy.

Do you want renewables or not?




Don't use that excuse ... we would still have ethanol with or without the subsidies ...if anything it would be cheaper without the subsidies thereby encouraging more customers to use the renewable v's the fossil fuels


Ok I actually agree with you.  As a private enterprise it should not be propped up.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Stratos
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4725
Re: Ending The Ethanal Subsidy
Reply #10 - Feb 14th, 2014 at 2:50pm
 
I think we should go big or go home when it comes to biofuel.

Above the tropic of Capricorn we have enough sugar to make ridiculous amounts of ethanol fuel, an all of it carbon neutral.

It will cost a lot to establish definitely, but think of not having to rely on the rest of the world for crude oil, which will continue to cause climate change, and will not last forever.

The current model is definitely inefficient however.
Back to top
 

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 15th, 2014 at 11:24pm:
Thus killing those Canaanite babies while they were still innocent, was a particularly merciful act
 
IP Logged
 
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: Ending The Ethanal Subsidy
Reply #11 - Feb 14th, 2014 at 3:15pm
 
Stratos wrote on Feb 14th, 2014 at 2:50pm:
I think we should go big or go home when it comes to biofuel.

I agree.

Quote:
Above the tropic of Capricorn we have enough sugar to make ridiculous amounts of ethanol fuel, an all of it carbon neutral.

It will cost a lot to establish definitely, but think of not having to rely on the rest of the world for crude oil, which will continue to cause climate change, and will not last forever.

The current model is definitely inefficient however.

I disagree with the premise that we should use existing agricultural land to grow it. The highest-yielding biofuel crop is algae, processed into biodiesel. It produces about 50 tonnes per year per hectare. No plant crop comes close.

It would take an area of about 12,000 km2 of desert with algal biodiesel crops to produce all of Australia's fuel needs - an area about 1/6 that of Tasmania.

Biodiesel yield with algae: 50 tonnes per hectare per year
Australia's oil consumption per year: about 60 million tonnes
Area required to replace oil: 60 million ÷ 50 = 1.2 million hectares = 12,000 km2
Area of Tasmania: 68,400 km2.
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
Stratos
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4725
Re: Ending The Ethanal Subsidy
Reply #12 - Feb 14th, 2014 at 3:22pm
 
Bam wrote on Feb 14th, 2014 at 3:15pm:
I disagree with the premise that we should use existing agricultural land to grow it. The highest-yielding biofuel crop is algae, processed into biodiesel. It produces about 50 tonnes per year per hectare. No plant crop comes close.


Yeah, admittedly I haven't looked into different fuel sources, and the literal millions of square kms of sugarcane in north QLD came to mind.
Back to top
 

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 15th, 2014 at 11:24pm:
Thus killing those Canaanite babies while they were still innocent, was a particularly merciful act
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Ending The Ethanal Subsidy
Reply #13 - Feb 14th, 2014 at 3:31pm
 
Issue with biofuel is peak phosphorus, estimated to happen in about 15 years.

Algae comes across as more sustainable.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
St George of the Garden
Gold Member
*****
Offline


http://tinyurl.com/n
3o8m2x

Posts: 9809
Gender: male
Re: Ending The Ethanal Subsidy
Reply #14 - Feb 14th, 2014 at 3:53pm
 
Ummm in 2011 I drove from Adelaide to Gladstone, the bit from Newcastle on along the coast. Sugarcane is grown in northern NSW and up to where ever.

Back to top
 

I want Muso as GMod. Bring back Muso!
WWW Friends of the National Broadband Network  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print