911 is like the magic pudding. Slice a bit off and its all still there.

The magic passport is the cherry on top. This purported terrorist's passport survived impact, survived combustion that even exotic metals did not survive and then floated gently down with not a mark on it into the hands of a mysterious stooge who never offered to appear on media.

http://www.wanttoknow.info/050908insidejob911

Top Politicians, Economists, Other Leaders Claim 9/11 Inside Job

Note: Though this page on 9/11 as an inside job has great information, we highly recommend our two newer webpages listing over 50 senior military, intelligence, and government officials and 100 respected professors who seriously question the 9/11 official story. A number even claim that 9/11 was an inside job and give evidence to back their claims. Links to verify their statements are provided. For senior government officials, click here. For respected professors, click here. For the excellent, information-packed 9/11 Information Center, click here.

Former Chief Economist under President Bush, Morgan Reynolds

Assistant Secretary of Treasury under Pres. Reagan, Paul Roberts

Head of Advanced Space Programs, Dept. of Defense, Dr. Robert Bowman

UK Minister of Environment (1997 - 2003), Michael Meacher

U.S. Senator Mark Dayton

U.S. Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney

Renowned Theologian Prof. David Ray Griffin

Assistant Secretary of Housing For Pres. Bush, Catherine Austin Fitts

9/11 statement signed by 100 prominent Americans, 40 9/11 family members

Gnads wrote on Feb 15^th, 2014 at 7:23pm:


Gnads darling, I had not realized you were such a soft and sensitive person. The words you use tend to express the opposite of sensitivity.

I will henceforth attempt to be less harsh on your sensitivities.

You should also follow your own advice.

Laugh till you cry wrote on Feb 16^th, 2014 at 11:30am:


Yeah well I'm glad you f#*ken noticed .... don't let it happen again

There are a lot of questions about the events in relation to aircraft performance exceeding specifications and manoeuvres only capable by exceptionally skilled pilots. The questions were all avoided by the 911 commission.

911 appears to be a planned event and Bush was just a stooge placed in power to allow it to proceed without hindrance. The main players can be traced back to Pappy Bush's administration, and Pappy Bush was the promoter of the "New World Order" probably at the instructions of his manipulators.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?s=2fc60146f1a44a7871e0bbebc0fe3cbe&showtopic=20178

NASA Flight Director Confirms 9/11 Aircraft Speed As The "Elephant In The Room"

06/22/2010 - (PilotsFor911Truth.org) Recently Pilots For 9/11 Truth have analyzed the speeds reported for the aircraft utilized on 9/11. Numerous aviation experts have voiced their concerns regarding the extremely excessive speeds reported above Maximum Operating for the 757 and 767, particularly, United and American Airlines 757/767 Captains who have actual flight time in all 4 aircraft reportedly used on 9/11. These experts state the speeds are impossible to achieve near sea level in thick air if the aircraft were a standard 757/767 as reported. Combined with the fact the airplane which was reported to strike the south tower of the World Trade Center was also producing high G Loading while turning and pulling out from a dive, the whole issue becomes incomprehensible to fathom a standard 767 can perform such maneuvers at such intense speeds exceeding Maximum Operating limits of the aircraft. Especially for those who research the topic thoroughly and have expertise in aviation.

Co-Founder of Pilots For 9/11 Truth Rob Balsamo recently interviewed a former NASA Flight Director in charge of flight control systems at the NASA Dryden Flight Research facility who is also speaking out after viewing the latest presentation by Pilots For 9/11 Truth - "9/11: World Trade Center Attack".

Retired NASA Senior Executive Dwain Deets published his concerns on the matter at the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) as follows:


A Responsibility to Explain an Aeronautical Improbability
Dwain Deets
NASA Dryden Flight Research Center (Senior Executive Service - retired)
AIAA Associate Fellow

The airplane was UA175, a Boeing 767-200, shortly before crashing into World Trade Center Tower 2. Based on analysis of radar data, the National Transportation and Safety Board reported the groundspeed just before impact as 510 knots. This is well beyond the maximum operating velocity of 360 knots, and maximum dive velocity of 410 knots. The possibilities as I see them are: (1) this wasn’t a standard 767-200; (2) the radar data was compromised in some manner; (3) the NTSB analysis was erroneous; or (4) the 767 flew well beyond its flight envelope, was controllable, and managed to hit a relatively small target. Which organization has the greater responsibility for acknowledging the elephant in the room? The NTSB, NASA, Boeing, or the AIAA? Have engineers authored papers, but the AIAA or NASA won’t publish them? Or, does the ethical responsibility lie not with organizations, but with individual aeronautical engineers? Have engineers just looked the other way?

The above entry remained at the moderated AIAA Aerospace America Forum for approximately two weeks before being removed without explanation. Click "Who is Ethically Responsible" submitted by Dwain Deets at the Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum for discussion on this entry at AIAA.

wow that's funny...

as soon as I put in my last post there was an advert banner on the bottom saying " THE GOV IS SPYING ON YOU" with a picture of Obama.... 

many blessings ,

and yes 9/11 was an inside job ..

the criminals are about to be arrested

all are most welcome

in love and light

namaste

- : ) =

ॐ

Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 16^th, 2014 at 9:43pm:


My dear child, you should have listened to your mother when she told you not to skip school.

The air is very thin at normal flying altitude. But it is much more dense at sea level like your cranium.

The argument seems to be speed at a certain height.  Opaerating speed is higher at 35000 feet than it is at sea level or near.

"if a boat is traveling at 10 knots, it is going 11.5 mph, or 15% more in that unit"

Ergo - if a Boeing is traveling at 360 kots (some say max speed at sea level is 360 MPH) that's 414 mph.

Maybe the radar information was wrong or distorted....  I would have thought, with some experience as pilot - that a flaps down and slow approach would enable a greater chance of a hit and would achieve possibly more damage... certainly no less damage.

Mind you if Ayrab Joe was hitting the firewall and not thinking too good.. he might try for a full tilt hit.. dropping the flaps at high speed will give you one hell of a jolt on the wings and a serious ballooning effect......

Ya gotta take it slow and steady.. not as if you're wall-to-wall in AAA and SAMs..flak you could walk home on if they knock your wings off....

Amazing that it hit at all!

ADDS:- Oh.. HERE!

http://www.flywestwind.com/hangar/aircraft_files/foms/B763ERFOM.pdf