Bobby. wrote on Mar 4^th, 2014 at 7:38am:


" A former CIA and civilian pilot has sworn an affidavit, stating that no planes flew into the Twin Towers as it would have been physically impossible.
John Lear, the son of Learjet inventor, Bill Lear, has given his expert evidence that it would have been physically impossible for Boeing 767s, like Flights AA11 and UA175 to have hit the Twin Towers on 9/11, particularly when flown by inexperienced pilots:
‘No Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors’, he stated in the affidavit.
‘Such crashes did not occur because they are physically impossible as depicted, for the following reasons: in the case of UAL 175 going into the south tower, a real Boeing 767 would have begun 'telescoping' when the nose hit the 14 inch steel columns which are 39 inches on center.
‘The vertical and horizontal tail would have instantaneously separated from the aircraft, hit the steel box columns and fallen to the ground.
‘The engines when impacting the steel columns would havemaintained their general shape and either fallen to the ground or been recovered in the debris of the collapsed building.
‘No Boeing 767 could attain a speed of 540 mph at 1000 feet above sea level ‘parasite drag doubles with velocity’ and ‘parasite power’ cubes with velocity.
The fan portion of the engine is not designed to accept the volume of dense air at that altitude and speed.
The piece of alleged external fuselage containing 3 or 4 window cutouts is inconsistent with an airplane that hit 14 inch steel box columns, placed at over 500 mph.  It would have crumpled.
No significant part of the Boeing 767 or engine could have penetrated the 14 inch steel columns and 37 feet beyond the massive core of the tower without part of it falling to the ground.
‘The debris of the collapse should have contained massive sections of the Boeing 767, including 3 engine cores weighing approximately 9000 pounds apiece which could not have been hidden. Yet there is no evidence of any of these massive structural components from either 767 at the WTC. Such complete disappearance of 767s is impossible.
The affidavit, dated 28th January 2014 is part of a law suit being pursued byMorgan Reynolds in the United States District Court, Southern District, New York.
In March 2007, Reynolds, a former chief economist under the George W Bush administration filed a Request For Correction with the US National Institute of Science and Technology citing his belief that real commercial jets (Boeings) did not hit the WTC towers. "

many blessings

you may interpret reality how you do so choose

the facts will continue to be delivered unto those

with eyes that do yet not see

in love and divine light

namaste

- : ) =

ॐ

The things that struck WTC 1 and 2 were military drones. Aircraft striking buildings don't cause buildings to pulverize. The thing that struck the Pentagon was a cruise missile.

Laugh till you cry wrote on Mar 3^rd, 2014 at 11:14pm:


Well done, you made me laugh till I cried. 

Gizomo's handler has given up on Gizmo and rolled out 2 one legged men hoping two halves make a whole in one. Friyay and Datalife are the current dummies spreading disinformation.

There is no answer to the absolute incredibility of the super efficiency of purported terrorists versus the absolute incompetence of the USA military. Just totally incredible.

Buildings of steel frame don't collapse from fire
Steel does not turn into dust from a kerosene fire
Concrete does not turn into dust from a kerosene fire
Steel cannot be melted by burning kerosene

WTC 7 was pulverized by demolition
WTC 1 and 2 were also pulverized by demolition

Keep the fires of indignation burning until the light embarrasses decent people involved in the cover up and they become whistle blowers.

Datalife wrote on Mar 4^th, 2014 at 2:29pm:


many blessings ,

here is the evidence



Stanley Kubrick Filmed Fake Moon Footage !! Proof !

fact is stranger than fiction

namaste

- : ) =