Australian Politics Forum - 911 was an inside job by Bush insiders

Wolseley

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1453
Sydney
Gender: male

Re: 911 was an inside job by Bush insiders
Reply #1050 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 4:27pm

Svengali wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 4:03pm:

Wolseley wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 3:38pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 9:14am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 13^th, 2015 at 9:58pm:

You need me to prove that the commercial airliner wings, which would not have much density and were lightweight for their size, would be able to break off upon impact and shatter into small pieces?

https://socioecohistory.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/major_general_albert_stubble...

many blessings , and no offence

yet I would believe a major general over some mindless major ignorant hack

you are forgiven

namaste

- : ) =

I don't know about you, but I would think twice before believing an officer who was involved in a U.S. military project to create a breed of super soldier who would have the ability to become invisible at will and to walk through walls and who reportedly attempted to walk through walls himself.

The Pentagon and the establishment will seek to blacken and defame anybody who challenges their 911 story. 911 was a criminal act and the participants have much to fear from exposure. They will do whatever it takes, even murder, to slience whistleblowers and silence people who lend authority to challenege the establishment story on 911.

But this bloke was trying to walk through walls in the early 1980s.

Back to top

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: 911 was an inside job by Bush insiders
Reply #1051 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 4:46pm

Richdude wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 4:28am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 13^th, 2015 at 9:58pm:

You need me to prove that the commercial airliner wings, which would not have much density and were lightweight for their size, would be able to break off upon impact and shatter into small pieces?

Well Rocky whatever hit the Pentagon disappeared on impact as well as the other 3 planes that day. First time that has happened - let alone 4. You may have seen a large number of FBI agents combing the grass adjacent to the crash site - removing evidence. Totally illegal to remove evidence from a crime scene of course.
The public just accept what their told - its called "authority spell". Brainwashed into believing whatever they're told. Although those with principles want to know the truth and that's what type of man this General is.

Or real 'normal' people may NOT have seen anything like that...
It could just be imbeciles like you and Wharfy (it is the light) who accept that idea..

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

it_is_the_light

Gold Member

Offline

Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male

Re: 911 was an inside job by Bush insiders
Reply #1052 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 4:49pm

Wolseley wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 3:38pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 9:14am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 13^th, 2015 at 9:58pm:

You need me to prove that the commercial airliner wings, which would not have much density and were lightweight for their size, would be able to break off upon impact and shatter into small pieces?

https://socioecohistory.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/major_general_albert_stubble...

many blessings , and no offence

yet I would believe a major general over some mindless major ignorant hack

you are forgiven

namaste

- : ) =

I don't know about you, but I would think twice before believing an officer who was involved in a U.S. military project to create a breed of super soldier who would have the ability to become invisible at will and to walk through walls and who reportedly attempted to walk through walls himself.

many blessings

it would appear you have been researching

this is progress

congratulations are in order

namaste

Back to top

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: 911 was an inside job by Bush insiders
Reply #1053 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 5:09pm

Wolseley wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 3:38pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 9:14am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 13^th, 2015 at 9:58pm:

You need me to prove that the commercial airliner wings, which would not have much density and were lightweight for their size, would be able to break off upon impact and shatter into small pieces?

https://socioecohistory.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/major_general_albert_stubble...

many blessings , and no offence

yet I would believe a major general over some mindless major ignorant hack

you are forgiven

namaste

- : ) =

I don't know about you, but I would think twice before believing an officer who was involved in a U.S. military project to create a breed of super soldier who would have the ability to become invisible at will and to walk through walls and who reportedly attempted to walk through walls himself.

Yeah, but that's a 'normal' idea...not a 'conspiraloon' fruitloop idea...like a number of the people on this forum..

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

Wolseley Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1453 Sydney Gender:	Re: 911 was an inside job by Bush insiders Reply #1054 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 5:34pm Richdude wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 4:28am: You may have seen a large number of FBI agents combing the grass adjacent to the crash site - removing evidence. So, there was a grassy knoll, was there?
Back to top	IP Logged

gizmo_2655 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 16010 South West NSW Gender:	Re: 911 was an inside job by Bush insiders Reply #1055 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 5:40pm Wolseley wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 5:34pm: Richdude wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 4:28am: You may have seen a large number of FBI agents combing the grass adjacent to the crash site - removing evidence. So, there was a grassy knoll, was there? Hehehe It would seem so...
Back to top	"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition. It's similar to a strawman fallacy" Bobbythebat IP Logged

UnSubRocky

Gold Member

Offline

Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 25022
Rockhampton
Gender: male

Re: 911 was an inside job by Bush insiders
Reply #1056 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 8:33pm

Richdude wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 4:28am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 13^th, 2015 at 9:58pm:

You need me to prove that the commercial airliner wings, which would not have much density and were lightweight for their size, would be able to break off upon impact and shatter into small pieces?

Well Rocky whatever hit the Pentagon disappeared on impact as well as the other 3 planes that day. First time that has happened - let alone 4. You may have seen a large number of FBI agents combing the grass adjacent to the crash site - removing evidence. Totally illegal to remove evidence from a crime scene of course.
The public just accept what their told - its called "authority spell". Brainwashed into believing whatever they're told. Although those with principles want to know the truth and that's what type of man this General is.

There were thousands of witnesses who saw a plane fly into the first hit world trade centre. Times that ten fold who saw first hand the second plane hit the second tower. Imagine that there would have been thousands who saw the plane hit the Pentagon with their own eyes. Why would you assume that after seeing two video footages of planes hitting the trade centres that a third plane didn't hit the Pentagon, too?

I am sure that there were plenty of FBI CSIs roaming the Pentagon to collect and process the evidence.

Back to top

At this stage...

IP Logged

UnSubRocky

Gold Member

Offline

Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 25022
Rockhampton
Gender: male

Re: 911 was an inside job by Bush insiders
Reply #1057 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 8:52pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 9:14am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 13^th, 2015 at 9:58pm:

You need me to prove that the commercial airliner wings, which would not have much density and were lightweight for their size, would be able to break off upon impact and shatter into small pieces?

https://socioecohistory.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/major_general_albert_stubble...

many blessings , and no offence

yet I would believe a major general over some mindless major ignorant hack

you are forgiven

namaste

- : ) =

Bloody hell, you are a complete smug arse most times IITL. It's all a matter of physics. Planes have wings that are designed to be light weight, so that it can be more aerodynamic and be able to cut the costs of flying. Combine with the fact that the Pentagon itself is designed to withstand heavy bombardment, you would assume that the wings of any plane would not be able to maintain integrity after hitting the building at 600kph. Had the plane floated in at 100kph, perhaps the wings would have broken off upon impact. Then we might be able to see evidence of wings in some condition laying upon the ground. But those wings disintegrated up impact.

By the way, lightweight, that Major General, you believe, is probably the same guy that bombs your comrades arses in the past. So, I wouldn't be getting all chummy with Major Conspiracy Theory.

Back to top

At this stage...

IP Logged

it_is_the_light Gold Member Offline Christ Light Posts: 41434 The Pyramid of LIGHT Gender:	Re: 911 was an inside job by Bush insiders Reply #1058 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 9:11pm
Back to top	ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ IP Logged

it_is_the_light

Gold Member

Offline

Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male

Re: 911 was an inside job by Bush insiders
Reply #1059 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 9:16pm

Quote:

Combine with the fact that the Pentagon itself is designed to withstand heavy bombardment, you would assume that the wings of any plane would not be able to maintain integrity after hitting the building at 600kph.

many blessings

pls provide your proof and claim here

bring forth your evidence that you announce

1. how far did the ' plane ' get into the pentagon

2. how many reinforced concrete walls did this ' plane ' penetrate

namaste

Back to top

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

IP Logged

UnSubRocky

Gold Member

Offline

Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 25022
Rockhampton
Gender: male

Re: 911 was an inside job by Bush insiders
Reply #1060 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 9:57pm

I don't need to provide proof that a plane's wings can't maintain integrity on high speed impact, idiot. You need to provide proof that the plane's wings can maintain integrity. I have seen enough over the last 13 years about that attack to know that the plane isn't going to survive unscathed a crash landing.

Feel free to show me which one of these high impact crashes would see their wings intact?

Back to top

At this stage...

IP Logged

UnSubRocky Gold Member Offline Crocodile Hunter: Origins Posts: 25022 Rockhampton Gender:	Re: 911 was an inside job by Bush insiders Reply #1061 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 9:59pm And whilst we are on point here, can you quit with posting the "here come the 9/11 memes". We saw it already.
Back to top	At this stage... IP Logged

it_is_the_light

Gold Member

Offline

Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male

Re: 911 was an inside job by Bush insiders
Reply #1062 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 10:05pm

UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 9:57pm:

I don't need to provide proof that a plane's wings can't maintain integrity on high speed impact, idiot. You need to provide proof that the plane's wings can maintain integrity. I have seen enough over the last 13 years about that attack to know that the plane isn't going to survive unscathed a crash landing.

Feel free to show me which one of these high impact crashes would see their wings intact?

many blessings you are forgiven dear being , in which

you are held in high regard , and so ..

lets look at some diagrams footage and facts

on that which you have mentioned , so lets explore shall we

http://www.sott.net/article/124500-Evidence-That-a-Frozen-Fish-Didnt-Impact-the-...

Back to top

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: 911 was an inside job by Bush insiders
Reply #1063 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 10:13pm

UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 8:33pm:

Richdude wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 4:28am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 13^th, 2015 at 9:58pm:

You need me to prove that the commercial airliner wings, which would not have much density and were lightweight for their size, would be able to break off upon impact and shatter into small pieces?

Well Rocky whatever hit the Pentagon disappeared on impact as well as the other 3 planes that day. First time that has happened - let alone 4. You may have seen a large number of FBI agents combing the grass adjacent to the crash site - removing evidence. Totally illegal to remove evidence from a crime scene of course.
The public just accept what their told - its called "authority spell". Brainwashed into believing whatever they're told. Although those with principles want to know the truth and that's what type of man this General is.

There were thousands of witnesses who saw a plane fly into the first hit world trade centre. Times that ten fold who saw first hand the second plane hit the second tower. Imagine that there would have been thousands who saw the plane hit the Pentagon with their own eyes. Why would you assume that after seeing two video footages of planes hitting the trade centres that a third plane didn't hit the Pentagon, too?

I am sure that there were plenty of FBI CSIs roaming the Pentagon to collect and process the evidence.

Because ALL the people who 'claim' to have seen it where "obviously" part of the conspiracy...don't ya know??? (sarcasm)

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

Svengali

Gold Member

Offline

Please don't thank me

Posts: 3474
Gender: male

Re: 911 was an inside job by Bush insiders
Reply #1064 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 10:52pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 10:13pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 8:33pm:

Richdude wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 4:28am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 13^th, 2015 at 9:58pm:

You need me to prove that the commercial airliner wings, which would not have much density and were lightweight for their size, would be able to break off upon impact and shatter into small pieces?

Well Rocky whatever hit the Pentagon disappeared on impact as well as the other 3 planes that day. First time that has happened - let alone 4. You may have seen a large number of FBI agents combing the grass adjacent to the crash site - removing evidence. Totally illegal to remove evidence from a crime scene of course.
The public just accept what their told - its called "authority spell". Brainwashed into believing whatever they're told. Although those with principles want to know the truth and that's what type of man this General is.

There were thousands of witnesses who saw a plane fly into the first hit world trade centre. Times that ten fold who saw first hand the second plane hit the second tower. Imagine that there would have been thousands who saw the plane hit the Pentagon with their own eyes. Why would you assume that after seeing two video footages of planes hitting the trade centres that a third plane didn't hit the Pentagon, too?

I am sure that there were plenty of FBI CSIs roaming the Pentagon to collect and process the evidence.

Because ALL the people who 'claim' to have seen it where "obviously" part of the conspiracy...don't ya know??? (sarcasm)

Speaking of brainwashed here is Gizmo who perpetually shills whatever he is paid to from scripts.

If 911 was a terrorist act there would have been no need for a cover up and the removal of evidence. Normal CSI practices would have uncovered all the required evidence.

However the Bush conspirators did not want a normal CSI conducted because the whole incident in 4 parts was a monstrous criminal fraud.

Most of the facts in question cannot be explained by the establishment shills and they just provide scripted responses on cue as they are paid to do.

Back to top

We first fought the heathens in the name of religion, then Communism, and now in the name of drugs and terrorism. Our excuses for global domination always change.
Serj Tankian

IP Logged