longweekend58 wrote on Mar 28
th, 2016 at 9:30am:
no, you DONT understand it at all. the moon-land thread laid bare your appalling understanding of science.
You don't know my background, how can you make such a judgement, I don't believe it, why..?
some points that stand out like dogs balls.
1. Van Allen belts are full of radiation, we know the shuttle had a thin skin of aluminium and some lagging for heat retention, nothing to protect the men from radiation.
it went THRU the van allen belts not stay in it. It also went thru the thinnest parts. Dr van Allen himself explained that.
2. The shuttle on landing and after a time should have been covered with dust, (look at the footprints of the astronauts), looks like someone took to it with mr.sheen in the photos.
This has been explained to you many times. dust in a vaccuum flies out in a parabolic trajectory. None would land on the LM.
3. The US flag should have been as limp as 110 year old mans dick.
it was hanging from a rod, you ignorant twit.
4. How did the rover get there....????
It was stored in the lower half of the LM as articulated a thousand times before.
5. many more but you get the jist.
Quote:cleverer people than you or I have produced detailed papers regarding the collapses and have concluded - without bias - that they are consistent with the events we all witnessed.
We may not be the sharpest tools in the shed, but you sound like you don't understand anything and therefore must resort to the official explanation.
Quote:YOU dont understand how it is possible so you assume conspiracy. 500 years ago you would be heading up Witch Trials for the same reason.
If they were indeed demolished then Bin Laden and his shepherd's carrying ak47's couldn't have done it, let alone perform complicated flying manoeuvres with a jet liner.