Yay another asshole who thinks this is even a debate

austranger wrote:

Quote:





Puhlease don't tell me that you actually paid money to be as edumacated as you now are?? Bwahahahaha ROFL    Austranger baby cakes, you've made my month!!

Why not post it a third time, since you lack any actual evidence

So you admit now that you didn't see the first plane strike until at least the next day?

You see, It's not that hard to be honest now is it?

Amadd wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2014 at 1:31pm:


You really work hard at being an idiot, I'll give you that at least!
I gather you're now claiming that the second plane went in the next day? 

I'm bored with this game now, you're no fun at all, it's too easy showing you up. 

Oh well, enjoy your paranoid delusions, if nothing else you keep aluminium workers employed!

Still, if you simply must worry about World Domination, here's the real conspiracy, spread the Word, ACT NOW, before it's TOO LATE!!! 

Amadd wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2014 at 1:56pm:


Really?
I'm still waiting for your rational response to the video and links I posted on the construction of the Towers, and why they came to collapse.

So far you haven't said anything sensible at all, only posted more abuse and U-tube fantasies.
Feel free to offer something other than more of the same, like I said, so far you're just boring me mightily.

Please consider. More information refuting the findings of the bent 911 Commission:

http://www.911truth.org/press-release-world-trade-center-bldg-7s-controlled-demo...

World Trade Center Bldg. 7’s Controlled Demolition: 9/11 Consensus Panel Releases New Evidence from Witness Testimonies and Architectural Drawings

"...June 2, 2014 – The 24-member 9/11 Consensus Panel – which includes physicists, chemists, engineers, commercial pilots, attorneys and lawyers – today announced three new studies confirming the controlled demolition of World Trade Center 7.

The studies scientifically refute the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) claim that, for the first time in history, fire caused the sudden and complete collapse of a large, fire-protected, steel-framed building on 9/11.

(Note that whereas the Consensus Panel uses a scientific methodology to peer-review its work, the NIST report was not peer-reviewed.)

The first Panel study deals with the NIST computer simulations, which purported to show that fire-induced thermal expansion caused a girder to be pushed off its seat at Column 79, thereby initiating a global collapse of the entire 47-storey building at 5:21 in the afternoon.

However, a recent FOIA request has produced WTC 7 architectural drawings showing that the NIST simulations omitted basic structural supports that would have made this girder failure impossible.

The second Consensus Panel study deals with NIST’s claim that it did not recover any steel from this massive steel-frame skyscraper.

This is extraordinary, given the need to understand why a steel-frame building would have completely collapsed for the first time in history from fire alone, and to thereby prevent a recurrence.

We know now that some of the steel was recovered.  Photographs recently obtained by researchers show the strange curled-up paper-thin WTC 7 steel, with a NIST investigator pointing it…."

There is no doubt in my mind that 9/11 was an inside job.