Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
A good reason to abort a foetus (Read 3248 times)
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26506
Australia
Re: A good reason to abort a feotus
Reply #15 - Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:06am
 
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 10:49am:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 10:47am:
You cant kill babies in australia. They are foetuses. In america though you can do it i guess.

SOB




Ummm, yeah, ok, thanks for that nugget of useless information




Well i doubt a foetus can be tested for the gene.

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: A good reason to abort a foetus
Reply #16 - Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:06am
 
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 10:34am:
The confirmation of the existence of a ‘gay gene’ or genes will strengthen arguments that homosexuality is a matter of biology, rather than choice.



Why, oh why*, is it still presented as being wholly one or wholly the other?  It, just like everything else, is a bit of both.




*rhetorical.  Perpetuating irresolvable arguments between two, equally incorrect camps = ongoing clicks = $$$$. 
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: A good reason to abort a foeteus
Reply #17 - Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:09am
 
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:01am:
____ wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 10:53am:
Yet will it.
It would be like trying to end a certain eye colour.

It would be easier to end homophobia and then no one would care about the sexual energy of their children.




I think killing off a defect gene type would be much easier that setting up concentration camps to re-educate an entire population to accept a defecting person or group.


We all benefit with this type of abortion and it's taxpayer funded so you know it's a good idea.


The progressives get more abortions, they love nothing more than killing otherwise viable foetuses for lifestyle reason, and we all get less homos, so the whinging will certainly decrease without them constantly bleating about some sh1t or other.






Well the internet has heard of war-porn but is this forum really ready to become globally famous for naming and shaming the phenomena of abortion-porn ?????  Embarrassed Huh Huh  Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: A good reason to abort a feotus
Reply #18 - Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:12am
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:06am:
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 10:49am:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 10:47am:
You cant kill babies in australia. They are foetuses. In america though you can do it i guess.

SOB




Ummm, yeah, ok, thanks for that nugget of useless information




Well i doubt a foetus can be tested for the gene.

SOB



That's because you are not very bright or particularly well read; makes you ignorant in the extreme.


Do you believe this because you believe that a foetus does not have DNA and thereforehas nothing to test or that a feoetus is surrounded by an impenetrable barrier and protected from testing.


Because the story clearly states that is will very much be able to be tested in the near future, you have to read it to know that.





Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 84252
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: A good reason to abort a feotus
Reply #19 - Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:12am
 
Gnads wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 10:55am:
FOETUS OR FETUS


Your choice

The Sexual Assault Hotline

You rape em
We scrape em
No Foetus
Can beat us

Call 1800 Yabby Pump


Your sense of humour, massively pointed as it is - has taken a serious downturn since you have had contact with me......

Grin    Grin   Grin
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: A good reason to abort a foeteus
Reply #20 - Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:14am
 
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:01am:
____ wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 10:53am:
Yet will it.
It would be like trying to end a certain eye colour.

It would be easier to end homophobia and then no one would care about the sexual energy of their children.




I think killing off a defect gene type would be much easier that setting up concentration camps to re-educate an entire population to accept a defecting person or group.


We all benefit with this type of abortion and it's taxpayer funded so you know it's a good idea.


The progressives get more abortions, they love nothing more than killing otherwise viable foetuses for lifestyle reason, and we all get less homos, so the whinging will certainly decrease without them constantly bleating about some sh1t or other.








You call homosexuality a defective gene yet is it


Famous homosexuals from history :

Jesus Christ, Epaminondas, Alexander The Great, Hadrian, Antinos, Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, Pietro Aretino, Cyrano de Bergerac, Richard Cromwell and so on.


You calling all the of gay and lesbians that have helped shaped the human races as defective without any evidence.


Put up or reinforce your laughable status as villiage id. on this board.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: A good reason to abort a foetus
Reply #21 - Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:14am
 
... wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:06am:
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 10:34am:
The confirmation of the existence of a ‘gay gene’ or genes will strengthen arguments that homosexuality is a matter of biology, rather than choice.



Why, oh why*, is it still presented as being wholly one or wholly the other?  It, just like everything else, is a bit of both.




*rhetorical.  Perpetuating irresolvable arguments between two, equally incorrect camps = ongoing clicks = $$$$. 




But why take the chance, and progressive love to kill the unborn, so it is a win - win



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: A good reason to abort a foetus
Reply #22 - Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:16am
 
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
... wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:06am:
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 10:34am:
The confirmation of the existence of a ‘gay gene’ or genes will strengthen arguments that homosexuality is a matter of biology, rather than choice.



Why, oh why*, is it still presented as being wholly one or wholly the other?  It, just like everything else, is a bit of both.




*rhetorical.  Perpetuating irresolvable arguments between two, equally incorrect camps = ongoing clicks = $$$$. 




But why take the chance, and progressive love to kill the unborn, so it is a win - win







Honky has a point, does bisexuals have the gay gene bigol?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: A good reason to abort a foetus
Reply #23 - Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:17am
 
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
... wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:06am:
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 10:34am:
The confirmation of the existence of a ‘gay gene’ or genes will strengthen arguments that homosexuality is a matter of biology, rather than choice.



Why, oh why*, is it still presented as being wholly one or wholly the other?  It, just like everything else, is a bit of both.




*rhetorical.  Perpetuating irresolvable arguments between two, equally incorrect camps = ongoing clicks = $$$$. 




But why take the chance, and progressive love to kill the unborn, so it is a win - win



Yes, I'd love to see the knots they tie themselves in trying to justify that one.

It's abhorrent to abort on the basis of genetic defect - the only acceptable reason for abortion is to preserve your lifestyle.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: A good reason to abort a foeteus
Reply #24 - Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:18am
 
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:09am:
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:01am:
____ wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 10:53am:
Yet will it.
It would be like trying to end a certain eye colour.

It would be easier to end homophobia and then no one would care about the sexual energy of their children.




I think killing off a defect gene type would be much easier that setting up concentration camps to re-educate an entire population to accept a defecting person or group.


We all benefit with this type of abortion and it's taxpayer funded so you know it's a good idea.


The progressives get more abortions, they love nothing more than killing otherwise viable foetuses for lifestyle reason, and we all get less homos, so the whinging will certainly decrease without them constantly bleating about some sh1t or other.






Well the internet has heard of war-porn but is this forum really ready to become globally famous for naming and shaming the phenomena of abortion-porn ?????  Embarrassed Huh Huh  Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry

No, please don't let it be so... we haven't got our house in order yet- our global mod is fossil fooled incorporated yet our name gives the impression that we have uncensored debate surrounding all issues toward making the country of Australia better and a more legitimate world citizen.... aggggghhhhhhhh we are not ready to host the worlds interested partys who simply want to checkout the cojones of a political forum who dared invent the term 'abortion-porn'
.... AAAAUrrrrrrrghhhhh!!! We're...just not readddddddy aaaaaaargggghhh  Shocked Shocked Grin

**   quick,... everyone grab a broom,... do something aaaaaauuuurghhhhhh !!!!!!  Huh  Grin Grin
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: A good reason to abort a foeteus
Reply #25 - Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:18am
 
____ wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:01am:
____ wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 10:53am:
Yet will it.
It would be like trying to end a certain eye colour.

It would be easier to end homophobia and then no one would care about the sexual energy of their children.




I think killing off a defect gene type would be much easier that setting up concentration camps to re-educate an entire population to accept a defecting person or group.


We all benefit with this type of abortion and it's taxpayer funded so you know it's a good idea.


The progressives get more abortions, they love nothing more than killing otherwise viable foetuses for lifestyle reason, and we all get less homos, so the whinging will certainly decrease without them constantly bleating about some sh1t or other.








You call homosexuality a defective gene yet is it


Famous homosexuals from history :

Jesus Christ, Epaminondas, Alexander The Great, Hadrian, Antinos, Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, Pietro Aretino, Cyrano de Bergerac, Richard Cromwell and so on.


You calling all the of gay and lesbians that have helped shaped the human races as defective without any evidence.


Put up or reinforce your laughable status on this board.




It is defective because it is in only a small non-replication portion of the population and as progressive know, abortions are a great way of getting the lifestyle you feel you deserve and who realy wants to deal with a homo kid all day.

It a lifestyle choice, it's what you progressive have been actively promoting; now we all have a vallid reason to kill off the unwanted


You have been one of the main proponents of lifestyle abortions, you know kill it if it interferes with you personal lifestyle; well embrace the progressive new world you wanted.

Isn't science great?


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: A good reason to abort a foetus
Reply #26 - Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:20am
 
... wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:17am:
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
... wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:06am:
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 10:34am:
The confirmation of the existence of a ‘gay gene’ or genes will strengthen arguments that homosexuality is a matter of biology, rather than choice.



Why, oh why*, is it still presented as being wholly one or wholly the other?  It, just like everything else, is a bit of both.




*rhetorical.  Perpetuating irresolvable arguments between two, equally incorrect camps = ongoing clicks = $$$$. 




But why take the chance, and progressive love to kill the unborn, so it is a win - win



Yes, I'd love to see the knots they tie themselves in trying to justify that one.

It's abhorrent to abort on the basis of genetic defect - the only acceptable reason for abortion is to preserve your lifestyle. 




Sad but true, we all want what the progressives want us to want.




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: A good reason to abort a foeteus
Reply #27 - Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:24am
 
____ wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:01am:
____ wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 10:53am:
Yet will it.
It would be like trying to end a certain eye colour.

It would be easier to end homophobia and then no one would care about the sexual energy of their children.




I think killing off a defect gene type would be much easier that setting up concentration camps to re-educate an entire population to accept a defecting person or group.


We all benefit with this type of abortion and it's taxpayer funded so you know it's a good idea.


The progressives get more abortions, they love nothing more than killing otherwise viable foetuses for lifestyle reason, and we all get less homos, so the whinging will certainly decrease without them constantly bleating about some sh1t or other.








You call homosexuality a defective gene yet is it


Famous homosexuals from history :

Jesus Christ, Epaminondas, Alexander The Great, Hadrian, Antinos, Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, Pietro Aretino, Cyrano de Bergerac, Richard Cromwell and so on.


You calling all the of gay and lesbians that have helped shaped the human races as defective without any evidence.


Put up or reinforce your laughable status as villiage id. on this board.

Um, how do you know jesus was a homosexual?
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: A good reason to abort a foeteus
Reply #28 - Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:27am
 
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:18am:
____ wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:01am:
____ wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 10:53am:
Yet will it.
It would be like trying to end a certain eye colour.

It would be easier to end homophobia and then no one would care about the sexual energy of their children.




I think killing off a defect gene type would be much easier that setting up concentration camps to re-educate an entire population to accept a defecting person or group.


We all benefit with this type of abortion and it's taxpayer funded so you know it's a good idea.


The progressives get more abortions, they love nothing more than killing otherwise viable foetuses for lifestyle reason, and we all get less homos, so the whinging will certainly decrease without them constantly bleating about some sh1t or other.








You call homosexuality a defective gene yet is it


Famous homosexuals from history :

Jesus Christ, Epaminondas, Alexander The Great, Hadrian, Antinos, Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, Pietro Aretino, Cyrano de Bergerac, Richard Cromwell and so on.


You calling all the of gay and lesbians that have helped shaped the human races as defective without any evidence.


Put up or reinforce your laughable status on this board.




It is defective because it is in only a small non-replication portion of the population and as progressive know, abortions are a great way of getting the lifestyle you feel you deserve and who realy wants to deal with a homo kid all day.

It a lifestyle choice, it's what you progressive have been actively promoting; now we all have a vallid reason to kill off the unwanted


You have been one of the main proponents of lifestyle abortions, you know kill it if it interferes with you personal lifestyle; well embrace the progressive new world you wanted.

Isn't science great?





You are now getting your tail in a spin and mixing things up.

Not reproducing, especially in an over populated world is a god send.

If more of the population were to breed gay children then we would have the best of both worlds … the drive of more gay people amongst us and reducing the risk of the human race from the situation of plague population proportions in a few generations.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: A good reason to abort a foeteus
Reply #29 - Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:29am
 
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:24am:
____ wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:01am:
____ wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 10:53am:
Yet will it.
It would be like trying to end a certain eye colour.

It would be easier to end homophobia and then no one would care about the sexual energy of their children.




I think killing off a defect gene type would be much easier that setting up concentration camps to re-educate an entire population to accept a defecting person or group.


We all benefit with this type of abortion and it's taxpayer funded so you know it's a good idea.


The progressives get more abortions, they love nothing more than killing otherwise viable foetuses for lifestyle reason, and we all get less homos, so the whinging will certainly decrease without them constantly bleating about some sh1t or other.








You call homosexuality a defective gene yet is it


Famous homosexuals from history :

Jesus Christ, Epaminondas, Alexander The Great, Hadrian, Antinos, Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, Pietro Aretino, Cyrano de Bergerac, Richard Cromwell and so on.


You calling all the of gay and lesbians that have helped shaped the human races as defective without any evidence.


Put up or reinforce your laughable status as villiage id. on this board.

Um, how do you know jesus was a homosexual?



The bible tells us
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print