Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Muhammed the torturer (Read 7013 times)
True Colours
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2837
Gender: male
Re: Muhammed the torturer
Reply #15 - Apr 8th, 2014 at 6:02pm
 
freediver wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 11:35am:
I see this claim made by Muslims on a regular basis:

freediver wrote on Feb 16th, 2014 at 9:15am:
True Colours wrote on Feb 15th, 2014 at 10:40pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 15th, 2014 at 5:14pm:
It was not "war compensation" because it happened before the war. The war was a response by the Meccans to Muhammed robbing their caravans. Muhammed had a long career as a highway robber before he moved up to rape and pillage.


Before the incident you speak of, the pagans of Mecca killed, tortured, raped, stole property and promised to kill every Muslim in Medina. Perhaps you think that was some kind of state of peace, most people would not.

freediver wrote on Feb 15th, 2014 at 5:14pm:
Muhammed stoned rapists, but was himself a rapist. He executed thieves, but was himself a thief. The difference being of course, that Muhammed permitted himself to rape and pillage.

Big claims -  for which you have no evidence.


And why did they do this?

I have seen evidence of Muhammed himself engaging in torture (to force a Jew to give up his Jew gold). But I have not seen evidence of Muslims being tortured. Last time I asked the closest I got was being spat on and bitten by a dog.


The only evidence I have found is that Muhammed himself was the torturer:

Kinana b. al-Rabi`, who had the custody of the treasure of B. al-Nadir, was brought to the apostle who asked him about it. He denied that he knew where it was. A Jew came (T. was brought) to the apostle and said that he had seen Kinana going round a certain ruin every morning early. When the apostle said to Kinana, "Do you know that if we find you have it I shall kill you?" he said Yes. The apostle gave orders that the ruin was to be excavated and some of the treasure was found. When he asked him about the rest he refused to produce it, so the apostle gave orders to al-Zubayr b. al-`Awwam, "Torture him until you extract what he has," so he kindled a fire with flint and steel on his chest until he was nearly dead. Then the apostle delivered him to Muhammad b. Maslama and he struck off his head, in revenge for his brother Mahmud. (Ibn Ishaq, Sirat Rasul Allah, translated as, The Life of Muhammad, (tr. A. Guillaume), Karachi: Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 515.)

(That night, Muhammed and the man's widow fell madly in love and spent the night together in Muhammed's tent)

In response to Muhammed's favourite child bride being accused of adultery:

Ishaq:496      "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"

Sahih Muslim Book 016, Hadith Number 4131.
Anas reported: Eight men of the tribe of 'Ukl came to Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) and swore allegiance to him on Islam, but found the climate of that land uncongenial to their health and thus they became sick, and they made complaint of that to Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: Why don't you go to (the fold) of our camels along with our shepherd, and make use of their milk and urine. They said: Yes. They set out and drank their (camels') milk and urine and regained their health. They killed the shepherd and drove away the camels. This (news) reached Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) and he sent them on their track and they were caught and brought to him (the Holy Prophet). He commanded about them, and (thus) their hands and feet were cut off and their eyes were gouged and then they were thrown in the sun, until they died.
This hadith has been narrated on the authority of Ibn al-Sabbah with a slight variation of words.

Quran 5:33
The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides.

Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 436
“…they brought them along and questioned them while the apostle was standing praying… The people were dismayed at their report…and so they beat them. When they were beaten soundly..."

Abu Dawud 38:4474
Narrated AbdurRahman ibn Azhar:
I saw the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) on the morning of the conquest of Mecca when I was a young boy. He was walking among the people, seeking the camp of Khalid ibn al-Walid. A man who had drunk wine was brought (before him) and he ordered them (to beat him). So they beat him with what they had in their hands. Some struck him with whips, some with sticks and some with sandals. The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) threw some dust on his face.
When a man who had drunk wine was brought before AbuBakr, he asked them (i.e. the people) about the number of beatings which they gave him. They numbered it forty. So AbuBakr gave him forty lashes.


I think that most of us would agree that there is a stark difference between a person being punished for a crime and being punished for their religious beliefs.

The stories that you have posted are about criminals being punished and some of them are fabrications.

Prophet Muhammed and his followers were tortured by pagans for being monotheists, not for being criminals - a subtle difference that perhaps you are unable to grasp.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Muhammed the torturer
Reply #16 - Apr 8th, 2014 at 7:08pm
 
Quote:
Prophet Muhammed and his followers were tortured by pagans for being monotheists, not for being criminals - a subtle difference that perhaps you are unable to grasp.


So you keep saying. So why are your references so hard to chase up?

Muhammed used the torture claims etc as an excuse for his campaign over several years of robbing Meccan caravans, so don't try to legal moral high ground BS. Muhammed's laws did not apply to himself. The defence of Islam is an endless exercise in justifying Muhammed's hypocrisy and dreaming up ever more convoluted excuses for why Muhammed's victims deserved the evil things that Muhammed did to them.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
True Colours
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2837
Gender: male
Re: Muhammed the torturer
Reply #17 - Apr 8th, 2014 at 8:16pm
 
freediver wrote on Apr 8th, 2014 at 7:08pm:
Quote:
Prophet Muhammed and his followers were tortured by pagans for being monotheists, not for being criminals - a subtle difference that perhaps you are unable to grasp.



Muhammed used the torture claims etc as an excuse for his campaign over several years of robbing Meccan caravans


Another Freediver lie.

The truth is that the Meccan pagans had declared war on the Muslims prior to any Muslim attacks on their caravans. If the pagans had pursued peace, then their caravans would not have been targeted.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
True Colours
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2837
Gender: male
Persecution of Muslims by pagans
Reply #18 - Apr 8th, 2014 at 8:19pm
 
freediver wrote on Apr 8th, 2014 at 7:08pm:
Quote:
Prophet Muhammed and his followers were tortured by pagans for being monotheists...


So you keep saying. So why are your references so hard to chase up?

Ok here is a quote from the most reliable book of hadeeth.


In a long hadeeth from Bukhari mentioning the signing of a peace treaty between the Muslims of Madinah and the pagans of Mecca, the torture of a refugee from Mecca is mentioned when it the pagans wished to stipulate that all Meccan refugees should not be granted asylum:

Quote:
...Then Suhail [a Meccan pagan] said, "We also stipulate that you should return to us whoever comes to you from us, even if he embraced your religion." The Muslims said, "Glory be to God! How will such a person be returned to the pagans after he has become a Muslim? While they were in this state Abu Jandal son of Suhail bin 'Amr came from the valley of Mecca staggering with his fetters and fell down amongst the Muslims. Suhail said, "O Muhammad! This is the very first term with which we make peace with you, [i.e. you shall return Abu Jandal to me]." The Prophet said, "The peace treaty has not been written yet." Suhail said, "I will never allow you to keep him." The Prophet said, "Yes, do." He said, "I won't do.: Mikraz said, "We allow you (to keep him)." Abu Jandal said, "O Muslims! Will I be returned to the pagans though I have come as a Muslim? Don't you see how much I have suffered?" Abu Jandal had been tortured severely for the [monotheistic] Cause of God...

-Bukhari

Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 8th, 2014 at 9:05pm by True Colours »  
 
IP Logged
 
True Colours
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2837
Gender: male
Re: Muhammed the torturer
Reply #19 - Apr 8th, 2014 at 8:24pm
 
Here is another hadeeth also from Bukhari:


Quote:
..." Ibn 'Umar said, "...during the lifetime of God's Prophet (Muhammed) when Islam had only a few followers; A man would be put to trial because of his religion; he would either be killed or tortured. But when the Muslims increased, there was no more afflictions or oppressions."...

- Bukhari
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
True Colours
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2837
Gender: male
Re: Muhammed the torturer
Reply #20 - Apr 8th, 2014 at 8:41pm
 
Oh and I nearly forgot there is even a Quran verse that revealed when the early Muslims were being tortured by the pagans of Mecca. I tells them that would be forgiven if the pagans forced them to recant monotheism through torture - as long as they really held to monotheism in their hearts:


Quote:
Whoever disbelieves in God after his belief - except for one who is forced [to renounce his religion] while his heart is secure in faith - but rather, those who willingly open their hearts to disbelief, upon them is God's wrath, and for them is a great punishment [Hell]

- an-Nahl, v.106
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Muhammed the torturer
Reply #21 - Apr 8th, 2014 at 8:46pm
 
TC can you please include a link when you copy and paste?

Quote:
The truth is that the Meccan pagans had declared war on the Muslims prior to any Muslim attacks on their caravans.


So you keep saying. Can you give me more information on this declaration of war?

Quote:
If the pagans had pursued peace, then their caravans would not have been targeted.


History tells a very different story. Muhammed robbed their caravans for years before they turned to war. Why are Muslims so comfortable pushing a version of history that does not even make sense? Would you declare war on someone, then wait several years while they robbed you at every opportunity and grew richer and stronger? Is this like Abu's claim that Muslims are only permitted to lie in the context of war, and the west has been at war with the Muslim world for over a century?

Quote:
In a long hadeeth from Bukhari mentioning the signing of a peace treaty between the Muslims of Madinah and the pagans of Mecca, the torture of a refugee from Mecca is mentioned when it the pagans wished to stipulate that all Meccan refugees should not be granted asylum:


Is that the only original reference to it?

What is the relevance of the hadith mentioning the treaty?

Quote:
Here is another hadeeth also from Bukhari:


According to google, that verse only exists here on this website.

Quote:
Oh and I nearly forgot there is even a Quran verse that revealed when the early Muslims were being tortured by the pagans of Mecca. I tells them that would be forgiven if the pagans forced them to recant monotheism through torture


It is impressive how it does this without using the word torture.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
True Colours
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2837
Gender: male
Re: Muhammed the torturer
Reply #22 - Apr 8th, 2014 at 9:34pm
 
.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Muhammed the torturer
Reply #23 - Apr 9th, 2014 at 8:14am
 
freediver wrote on Apr 8th, 2014 at 8:46pm:
History tells a very different story. Muhammed robbed their caravans for years before they turned to war. Why are Muslims so comfortable pushing a version of history that does not even make sense?


What doesn't make sense is to claim the muslims had no casus beli against the Meccans after being systematically persecuted by them, and driven out of their homes.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
True Colours
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2837
Gender: male
Re: Muhammed the torturer
Reply #24 - Apr 9th, 2014 at 10:33am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 9th, 2014 at 8:14am:
freediver wrote on Apr 8th, 2014 at 8:46pm:
History tells a very different story. Muhammed robbed their caravans for years before they turned to war. Why are Muslims so comfortable pushing a version of history that does not even make sense?


What doesn't make sense is to claim the muslims had no casus beli against the Meccans after being systematically persecuted by them, and driven out of their homes.


Don't forget the Meccans declarations that they would kill all the Muslims in Madina - a declaration of war if there ever was one.

Don't forget that the caravans in question were in Madinan territory, and belonged to a hostile state that had basically declared war on Madina.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Muhammed the torturer
Reply #25 - Apr 9th, 2014 at 8:35pm
 
True Colours wrote on Apr 9th, 2014 at 10:33am:
polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 9th, 2014 at 8:14am:
freediver wrote on Apr 8th, 2014 at 8:46pm:
History tells a very different story. Muhammed robbed their caravans for years before they turned to war. Why are Muslims so comfortable pushing a version of history that does not even make sense?


What doesn't make sense is to claim the muslims had no casus beli against the Meccans after being systematically persecuted by them, and driven out of their homes.


Don't forget the Meccans declarations that they would kill all the Muslims in Madina - a declaration of war if there ever was one.

Don't forget that the caravans in question were in Madinan territory, and belonged to a hostile state that had basically declared war on Madina.


Yes, better not forget that. Or you could back up these claims about torture. So far the only original reference I have seen is a single brief, vague sentence.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
moses
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6353
Re: Muhammed the torturer
Reply #26 - Apr 10th, 2014 at 8:26pm
 
I have 93 books of Bukhari in pdf form. So far I am unable to find any reference to the stuff T.C posted. Can anyone give some details as to exactly where it is in Bukhari?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Muhammed the torturer
Reply #27 - Apr 10th, 2014 at 8:41pm
 
The only apparently legit (ie original) reference I have found is this one:

http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/hadith/bukhari/050-sbt.php

Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Book 50:
Volume 3, Book 50, Number 891:

Abu Jandal had been tortured severely for the Cause of Allah.

I think that's it. All the others look like embellishments on this. No wonder TC always leaves out the sources.

On the other hand the Koran and Hadith are full of references to torture by Muhammed:

http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur%27an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:Muhammad_and_Torture
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 10th, 2014 at 8:47pm by freediver »  

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Muhammed the torturer
Reply #28 - Apr 11th, 2014 at 10:58am
 
freediver wrote on Apr 10th, 2014 at 8:41pm:
I think that's it. All the others look like embellishments on this.


TC gave two references to torture ahadeeth. The first on Abu Jandal you found yourself. The second I verified very easily after maybe 30 seconds of googling:

Sahih Bukhari Volume 006, Book 060, Hadith Number 040

Quote:
Ibn 'Umar said, "We did it, during the lifetime of Allah's Apostle when Islam had only a few followers. A man would be put to trial because of his religion; he would either be killed or tortured. But when the Muslims increased, there was no more afflictions or oppressions."


http://www.hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/93-sahih-bukhari-book-60-prophetic-...

What exactly are you accusing TC of again?
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Muhammed the torturer
Reply #29 - Apr 11th, 2014 at 11:02am
 
freediver wrote on Apr 8th, 2014 at 8:46pm:
According to google, that verse only exists here on this website.


Grin Grin Grin

It took me less than 30 seconds to find it FD.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print