Home Articles Forum Wiki Poll Garden Contact

 
 
 
  
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
 
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

  Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › Federal Politics › Thommo - GUILTY
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 9
Send Topic Print
Thommo - GUILTY (Read 13724 times)
FriYAY
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7395
Re: Thommo - GUILTY
Reply #15 - Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:45pm  
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:20pm:
FriYAY wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:19pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:10pm:
Now that the judicial system has taken its course and the outcome is GUILTY, throw him in a cage and chuck away the key.



You want the man jailed for life!!!

You people have lost the line between rational commentary and hysteria.


You clearly missed the point.


You actually made a point!!! Wow you're working your way up to half wit.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Thommo - GUILTY
Reply #16 - Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:46pm  
FriYAY wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:45pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:20pm:
FriYAY wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:19pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:10pm:
Now that the judicial system has taken its course and the outcome is GUILTY, throw him in a cage and chuck away the key.



You want the man jailed for life!!!

You people have lost the line between rational commentary and hysteria.


You clearly missed the point.


You actually made a point!!! Wow you're working your way up to half wit.


Smiley

Silly bum has eaten all his biscuits.

No problems, silly bum, here have some more:
...

Now, off you go and enjoy - and please, while you munch away on all those biscuits, do us all a favour and stop trolling? Smiley
Back to top
 
Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Thommo - GUILTY
Reply #17 - Feb 18th, 2014 at 2:39pm  
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:33pm:
matty wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:31pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:26pm:
matty wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:24pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:10pm:
Now that the judicial system has taken its course and the outcome is GUILTY, throw him in a cage and chuck away the key.

But that's the DIFFERENCE matty: It's the JUDICIAL SYSTEM that decides. NOT News Ltd, or Tony, or people with half a lobe missing.


Alevine, you'd have to be deaf, dumb and blind not to see that he was guilty from day one, it was blatantly obvious. Yet that didn't stop lefties on here (I don't think that you did but others) from saying that it was a conspiracy orchestrated by the likes of Jackson, Bolano, Abbott and the Liberal party at large, and that Thomson was an innocent man.

matty, you'd have to be missing a lobe to think it's okay to do prosecution and judgement, OF A CRIME, by newspaper.

And that's the point.





I understood/understand the point that you made/are making, but my point is that people made up false, unfair and above all else, completely illogical, allegations against these people, and they supported Thomson's speech in parliament, which is now found out to be full of lies.

Will these people now have the grace and humility to apologise and admit that they were wrong?

So if you understand my point, would you agree that it was not the place of Tony Abbott, then opposition leader, to try and perform the prosecution of a CRIME from opposition benches? Do you agree that Tony ABbott should  have immediately left it to the police to do their job - which would seem that they were able to do, after all?   As opposed to undermine the entire system for the sake of political point scoring?


You still haven't answered my question.

Abbott didn't try to prosecute Thomson, what he did was say that he needed to explain what he did. Thomson just remained quiet for a while, and that made him look even more suspicious. The Coalition ran with it thereafter, because they could see what was obvious to anyone with half a brain - Thomson was guilty!

Now, ask yourself this - why did Gillard (eventually) remove him before he was found to be guilty by the courts?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 18th, 2014 at 2:54pm by matty »  
BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Thommo - GUILTY
Reply #18 - Feb 18th, 2014 at 2:41pm  
Dsmithy70 wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:39pm:
matty wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:24pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:10pm:
Now that the judicial system has taken its course and the outcome is GUILTY, throw him in a cage and chuck away the key.

But that's the DIFFERENCE matty: It's the JUDICIAL SYSTEM that decides. NOT News Ltd, or Tony, or people with half a lobe missing.


Alevine, you'd have to be deaf, dumb and blind not to see that he was guilty from day one, it was blatantly obvious. Yet that didn't stop lefties on here (I don't think that you did but others) from saying that it was a conspiracy orchestrated by the likes of Jackson, Bolano, Abbott and the Liberal party at large, and that Thomson was an innocent man.



LINDY CHAMBERLIAN

ANDREW MALLARD

ROSEANNE BECKETT



I am not aware of Roseanne Beckett, but as for the other two, it's chalk and cheese. There was no evidence that Lindy Chamberlain did anything to Azaria.
Back to top
 
BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Thommo - GUILTY
Reply #19 - Feb 18th, 2014 at 2:49pm  
matty wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 2:39pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:33pm:
matty wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:31pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:26pm:
matty wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:24pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:10pm:
Now that the judicial system has taken its course and the outcome is GUILTY, throw him in a cage and chuck away the key.

But that's the DIFFERENCE matty: It's the JUDICIAL SYSTEM that decides. NOT News Ltd, or Tony, or people with half a lobe missing.


Alevine, you'd have to be deaf, dumb and blind not to see that he was guilty from day one, it was blatantly obvious. Yet that didn't stop lefties on here (I don't think that you did but others) from saying that it was a conspiracy orchestrated by the likes of Jackson, Bolano, Abbott and the Liberal party at large, and that Thomson was an innocent man.

matty, you'd have to be missing a lobe to think it's okay to do prosecution and judgement, OF A CRIME, by newspaper.

And that's the point.





I understood/understand the point that you made/are making, but my point is that people made up false, unfair and above all else, completely illogical, allegations against these people, and they supported Thomson's speech in parliament, which is now found out to be full of lies.

Will these people now have the grace and humility to apologise and admit that they were wrong?

So if you understand my point, would you agree that it was not the place of Tony Abbott, then opposition leader, to try and perform the prosecution of a CRIME from opposition benches? Do you agree that Tony ABbott should  have immediately left it to the police to do their job - which would seem that they were able to do, after all?   As opposed to undermine the entire system for the sake of political point scoring?


You still haven't answered my question.

Abbott didn't try to prosecute Thomson, what he did was say that he needed to explain what he did. Thomson just remained quite for a while, and that made him look even more suspicious. The Coalition ran with it thereafter, because they could see what was obvious to anyone with half a brain - Thomson was guilty!

Now, ask yourself this - why did Gillard (eventually) remove him before he was found to be guilty by the courts?


As an English major matty, you should know that it's quiet, and not quite. Wink

Abbott did nothing but try to prosecute Thomson. He thought he could be judge and juror, instead of letting the NORMAL process go its course.

I'm glad you agree with me on that point, it's a shame that you support it however.
Back to top
 
Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Thommo - GUILTY
Reply #20 - Feb 18th, 2014 at 2:53pm  
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 2:49pm:
matty wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 2:39pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:33pm:
matty wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:31pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:26pm:
matty wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:24pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:10pm:
Now that the judicial system has taken its course and the outcome is GUILTY, throw him in a cage and chuck away the key.

But that's the DIFFERENCE matty: It's the JUDICIAL SYSTEM that decides. NOT News Ltd, or Tony, or people with half a lobe missing.


Alevine, you'd have to be deaf, dumb and blind not to see that he was guilty from day one, it was blatantly obvious. Yet that didn't stop lefties on here (I don't think that you did but others) from saying that it was a conspiracy orchestrated by the likes of Jackson, Bolano, Abbott and the Liberal party at large, and that Thomson was an innocent man.

matty, you'd have to be missing a lobe to think it's okay to do prosecution and judgement, OF A CRIME, by newspaper.

And that's the point.





I understood/understand the point that you made/are making, but my point is that people made up false, unfair and above all else, completely illogical, allegations against these people, and they supported Thomson's speech in parliament, which is now found out to be full of lies.

Will these people now have the grace and humility to apologise and admit that they were wrong?

So if you understand my point, would you agree that it was not the place of Tony Abbott, then opposition leader, to try and perform the prosecution of a CRIME from opposition benches? Do you agree that Tony ABbott should  have immediately left it to the police to do their job - which would seem that they were able to do, after all?   As opposed to undermine the entire system for the sake of political point scoring?


You still haven't answered my question.

Abbott didn't try to prosecute Thomson, what he did was say that he needed to explain what he did. Thomson just remained quite for a while, and that made him look even more suspicious. The Coalition ran with it thereafter, because they could see what was obvious to anyone with half a brain - Thomson was guilty!

Now, ask yourself this - why did Gillard (eventually) remove him before he was found to be guilty by the courts?


As an English major matty, you should know that it's quiet, and not quite. Wink

Abbott did nothing but try to prosecute Thomson. He thought he could be judge and juror, instead of letting the NORMAL process go its course.

I'm glad you agree with me on that point, it's a shame that you support it however.



Unfortunately auto correct doesn't account for typos when the typos are real words.

I disagree with you about abbott. Why hasn't you answered my question/s yet? I answered your's.
Back to top
 
BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38814
Gender: male
Re: Thommo - GUILTY
Reply #21 - Feb 18th, 2014 at 3:03pm  
Quote:
I answered your's.


Matty's an English major, you say?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Thommo - GUILTY
Reply #22 - Feb 18th, 2014 at 3:04pm  
matty wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 2:53pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 2:49pm:
matty wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 2:39pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:33pm:
matty wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:31pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:26pm:
matty wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:24pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:10pm:
Now that the judicial system has taken its course and the outcome is GUILTY, throw him in a cage and chuck away the key.

But that's the DIFFERENCE matty: It's the JUDICIAL SYSTEM that decides. NOT News Ltd, or Tony, or people with half a lobe missing.


Alevine, you'd have to be deaf, dumb and blind not to see that he was guilty from day one, it was blatantly obvious. Yet that didn't stop lefties on here (I don't think that you did but others) from saying that it was a conspiracy orchestrated by the likes of Jackson, Bolano, Abbott and the Liberal party at large, and that Thomson was an innocent man.

matty, you'd have to be missing a lobe to think it's okay to do prosecution and judgement, OF A CRIME, by newspaper.

And that's the point.





I understood/understand the point that you made/are making, but my point is that people made up false, unfair and above all else, completely illogical, allegations against these people, and they supported Thomson's speech in parliament, which is now found out to be full of lies.

Will these people now have the grace and humility to apologise and admit that they were wrong?

So if you understand my point, would you agree that it was not the place of Tony Abbott, then opposition leader, to try and perform the prosecution of a CRIME from opposition benches? Do you agree that Tony ABbott should  have immediately left it to the police to do their job - which would seem that they were able to do, after all?   As opposed to undermine the entire system for the sake of political point scoring?


You still haven't answered my question.

Abbott didn't try to prosecute Thomson, what he did was say that he needed to explain what he did. Thomson just remained quite for a while, and that made him look even more suspicious. The Coalition ran with it thereafter, because they could see what was obvious to anyone with half a brain - Thomson was guilty!

Now, ask yourself this - why did Gillard (eventually) remove him before he was found to be guilty by the courts?


As an English major matty, you should know that it's quiet, and not quite. Wink

Abbott did nothing but try to prosecute Thomson. He thought he could be judge and juror, instead of letting the NORMAL process go its course.

I'm glad you agree with me on that point, it's a shame that you support it however.



Unfortunately auto correct doesn't account for typos when the typos are real words.

I disagree with you about abbott. Why hasn't you answered my question/s yet? I answered your's.

Your's is also incorrect.

Come on Matty!

I didn't see it that way, I only saw that you agreed with me on Tony and his complete disregard for the judicial process.
Back to top
 
Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Thommo - GUILTY
Reply #23 - Feb 18th, 2014 at 3:04pm  
Aussie wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 3:03pm:
Quote:
I answered your's.


Matty's an English major, you say?

He claims to be.  That's why he always tells us when we have spelling mistakes.
Back to top
 
Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
salad in
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5941
Re: Thommo - GUILTY
Reply #24 - Feb 18th, 2014 at 3:07pm  
It's interesting to reflect on Thomson's booster, our very own Wild One and the tosh he used to drag in here from Independent Australia. I can imagine that Wild One is out there trying to convince anyone prepared to listen that Melbourne magistrate  Charlie Rozencwajg delivered his findings without the benefit of reading Independent Australia first. What a silly magistrate.

For the record:

Quote:
Jacksonville 63: the "doomed" prosecution case against Craig Thomson.

In a Melbourne court yesterday, the shambolic prosecution case against Craig Thomson toppled and teetered even closer to total collapse. Peter Wicks reports.

YESTERDAY, in the Melbourne Magistrates Court, Craig Thomson was left scratching his head.

In what has been the latest bizarre event in the whole saga surrounding the former MP, the prosecution in the criminal case have gone all schizophrenic on us, offering one thing and doing another.

Sources close to the case have told IA of the prosecution approaching Thomson with an offer they likely hoped would be too good ‒ or Thomson too broke ‒ to refuse.

[...]

6 December 2013 | Jacksonville 66: Thomson in Court — Days 3 and 4
4 December 2013 | Jacksonville 65: Craig Thomson Trial Day Two — Hogwashgate
2 December 2013 | Jacksonville 64: Craig Thomson's trial by media
27 November 2013 | Jacksonville 63: The "doomed" prosecution case against Craig Thomson
21 November 2013 | Tony Abbott's torturous patrol boat diplomacy
17 October 2013 | Jacksonville 61: A licence to print money
16 October 2013 | The choice of rank and file: To reform Labor or toe the line
14 October 2013 | Unrepresentative ALP caucus snubs its membership again
11 October 2013 | Jacksonville 60: Fair Work Commission case against Thomson collapses
10 October 2013 | Jacksonville 59: Absent without leave
27 September 2013 | Shorten admirable but Albo FTW
26 September 2013 | Coalition refugee policy and our Global Backyard
13 September 2013 | Jacksonville 58: The Australian vs Craig Thomson

Et phuking c.

http://www.independentaustralia.net/profile-on/peter-wicks,73


Anyone in need of sh!t paper should contact IA. It has an endless supply.
Back to top
 
The ALP, the progressive party, the party of ideas, the workers' friend, is the only Australian political party to roast four young Australians in roof cavities. SHAME! SHAME! SHAME!
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58894
Here
Gender: male
Re: Thommo - GUILTY
Reply #25 - Feb 18th, 2014 at 3:25pm  
This couldn't have all gone onto the other topic  Smiley about the same thing ????
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Thommo - GUILTY
Reply #26 - Feb 18th, 2014 at 3:26pm  
Aussie wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 3:03pm:
Quote:
I answered your's.


Matty's an English major, you say?


Sorry, I make a lot of typos/errors when using my iphone., that I ordinarily wouldn't.
Back to top
 
BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Thommo - GUILTY
Reply #27 - Feb 18th, 2014 at 3:27pm  
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 3:04pm:
Aussie wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 3:03pm:
Quote:
I answered your's.


Matty's an English major, you say?

He claims to be.  That's why he always tells us when we have spelling mistakes.


No I didn't. I said that I scored 93 in the HSC.
Back to top
 
BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
woody2014
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2044
NTH EAST VIC
Gender: male
Re: Thommo - GUILTY
Reply #28 - Feb 18th, 2014 at 3:27pm  
Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 3:25pm:
This couldn't have all gone onto the other topic  Smiley about the same thing ????



Stiff! the pricks  GUILTY Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
THE DUMB LEFTIES ON THIS BOARD  DONT KNOW IF THERE WINDING THEIR ARSE OR SCRATCHING THEIR WATCH
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Thommo - GUILTY
Reply #29 - Feb 18th, 2014 at 3:30pm  
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:10pm:
Now that the judicial system has taken its course and the outcome is GUILTY, throw him in a cage and chuck away the key.

But that's the DIFFERENCE matty: It's the JUDICIAL SYSTEM that decides. NOT News Ltd, or Tony, or people with half a lobe missing.



not according to lefties on here......in fact some will still come out hollering he was robbed due to News Ltd reporting what he did..

remember they didnt make it up.. it was only reporting..the evidence.


now if you read the Independent.. you will get an entirely different report on what happened in court... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

everyone there said he was fixed up.. he was innocent..even the judge Cool from what little I remember of the tosh.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 9
Send Topic Print
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
 
 

  « Forum ‹ Board Top of this page

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge