Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 8
Send Topic Print
Medicare: It didn't that long (Read 5349 times)
woody2014
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2044
NTH EAST VIC
Gender: male
Re: Medicare: It didn't that long
Reply #30 - Feb 20th, 2014 at 9:20am
 
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Feb 20th, 2014 at 9:07am:
What does "It didn't that long" mean?


Whats wrong with a co contribution of  single digit dollars
for those not on a health care card eg  [,  teachers, GINA,
Clive , Public Service,  simple ! Grin Grin Grin Grin


Back to top
 

THE DUMB LEFTIES ON THIS BOARD  DONT KNOW IF THERE WINDING THEIR ARSE OR SCRATCHING THEIR WATCH
 
IP Logged
 
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: Medicare: It didn't that long
Reply #31 - Feb 20th, 2014 at 9:20am
 
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Feb 20th, 2014 at 9:07am:
What does "It didn't that long" mean?

Ask your English teacher if you have problems with English language comprehension.
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
woody2014
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2044
NTH EAST VIC
Gender: male
Re: Medicare: It didn't that long
Reply #32 - Feb 20th, 2014 at 9:27am
 
Bam wrote on Feb 20th, 2014 at 9:20am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Feb 20th, 2014 at 9:07am:
What does "It didn't that long" mean?

Ask your English teacher if you have problems with English language comprehension.


So what does it mean  SA  Wink
Back to top
 

THE DUMB LEFTIES ON THIS BOARD  DONT KNOW IF THERE WINDING THEIR ARSE OR SCRATCHING THEIR WATCH
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35054
Gender: male
Re: Medicare: It didn't that long
Reply #33 - Feb 20th, 2014 at 9:37am
 
Aust pays about 12 % gdp on health, USA about 16 %.
so private is not the answer.

NZ has a good system of co payments
kids free, adults about $9 a visit
but also a small co payment for hospital.

A totally free system is probably unsustainable.
I'd like to see some rewards for looking after your own health.
A small "no claims bonus" Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Swagman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Beware of cheap imitations......

Posts: 15095
Illawarra NSW
Gender: male
Re: Medicare: It didn't that long
Reply #34 - Feb 20th, 2014 at 9:38am
 
Bam wrote on Feb 20th, 2014 at 9:01am:
So put up the Medicare levy. No brainer.


Yes it is.

Bam wrote on Feb 20th, 2014 at 9:01am:
End the ridiculous inconsistency where self-funded retirees are kept out of the taxation system while being a part of the cohort that consumes the bulk of the health care budget. That is what is causing the unsustainability


You'll have to expand on ''self-funded retirees are kept out of the taxation system'' ?

My sis is a self funded retiree but she still pays lots of tax.

Bam wrote on Feb 20th, 2014 at 9:01am:
It is unfair because the largest consumers of the health care budget pay the least towards it even though many of them can easily afford to do so.


You'll need to elaborate there.  If you are again referring to self funded retirees I think you will find that they (most) are privately health insured and /or pay for their treatment outright.  Yes they can see a doctor for free but they also continue to pay the medicare levy.

The largest consumers of the health care budget by far would be the unfunded retirees.  Some see GPs every other day, it goes with the territory.  Obviously they couldn't afford multiple co-payments so anyone in this category would be subsidised much in the way prescriptions are now.  Over a certain amount of GP visits in a timeframe would be exempt.

Bam wrote on Feb 20th, 2014 at 9:01am:
These proposals do nothing towards addressing the sustainability of the health care budget but are just another tax grab to extort more silver from the poor by force to pay for the extravagant largesse of the wealthy


You were doing well up to now but the stupid politics of envy had to emerge eventually I guess.

ANY additional revenue to the Govt has to improve sustainability for ANY Govt service.

Whilst we have a flawed democracy the so-called rich will always pay the lion's share of the cost of Govt services.  The down trodden pay just about effall and will ride on the backs.  That just goes with the territory.

Bam wrote on Feb 20th, 2014 at 9:01am:
A more sensible approach that goes to the heart of the sustainability issue is ending the taxation moratorium on self-funded retirees. This would raise more revenue than the entire health budget, so use some of this extra revenue to improve funding for aged care


You think that is sensible?  I for one would drop any plans for being self funded.  I'll spend up now and ride on the tax-payers back when (if) I make it to old age.... Grin

Mind you the Tax-payer's back will likely be broken by then with all you lefties jumping on it.... Cheesy

Bam wrote on Feb 20th, 2014 at 9:01am:
Start with the self-funded retirees. The ones that earn good income from investing their superannuation and paying very little tax on it while at the same time being some of the largest consumers of the health care budget.

* Make superannuation lump sums tax free
* Tax investment income from investing superannuation as normal and end the tax moratorium
* Phase this in over 10 years


This is where you Truebelivers fall down.

You need to recognise a simple fact.  If you incentivise something you get more of it and if you penalise something you get less of it.

Tax is a penalty.  Start taxing superannuation at the 'normal' rate and there will be less superannuation which will only COST the Govt.

Tax investment and you will get less of it.

Remove the incentives to be a self funded retiree and you will get LESS self funded retirees.

Justabout all your proposals compound unsustainability not improve it......... Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10266
Gender: male
Re: Medicare: It didn't that long
Reply #35 - Feb 20th, 2014 at 10:37am
 
Bam wrote on Feb 20th, 2014 at 9:20am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Feb 20th, 2014 at 9:07am:
What does "It didn't that long" mean?

Ask your English teacher if you have problems with English language comprehension.


It's missing a verb.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Fit of Absent Mindeness
Gold Member
*****
Offline


We need more fits of absent
mindedness

Posts: 1622
Brisbane
Gender: male
Re: Medicare: It didn't that long
Reply #36 - Feb 20th, 2014 at 1:24pm
 
Look, poor people should have thought about their health care options before they decided to be poor. Stop expecting hardworking taxpayers to fund your lifestyle choices when we have Rupert to pay and corporate welfare to fund.
</sarcasm>

This is how the Coalition view poor people and want us to be more like America!
Back to top
 

Putting the n in cuts
 
IP Logged
 
woody2014
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2044
NTH EAST VIC
Gender: male
Re: Medicare: It didn't that long
Reply #37 - Feb 20th, 2014 at 1:31pm
 
Fit of Absent Mindeness wrote on Feb 20th, 2014 at 1:24pm:
Look, poor people should have thought about their health care options before they decided to be poor. Stop expecting hardworking taxpayers to fund your lifestyle choices when we have Rupert to pay and corporate welfare to fund.
</sarcasm>

This is how the Coalition view poor people and want us to be more like America!


Do you know and understand Coalition voters come from all walks of life.. Or is just to hard for you to understand

Wink Wink Wink
Back to top
 

THE DUMB LEFTIES ON THIS BOARD  DONT KNOW IF THERE WINDING THEIR ARSE OR SCRATCHING THEIR WATCH
 
IP Logged
 
ImSpartacus2
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6913
Re: Medicare: It didn't that long
Reply #38 - Feb 20th, 2014 at 1:38pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2014 at 8:18am:
They are really going after the wrong end of the system. Australias spend on primary care (GP's ) has declined as a percentage over time.
It is the spend on very very expensive high tech and high end pharmaceuticals that will cripple the system

If a drug to treat end stage breast cancer (ie prolong life by 6 months with no prospect of a cure) costs $100,000 a patient. Should this be listed on the pbs and paid for by the taxpayer. What if its 2 months, What if its 5 years.
These are the difficult questions that the government need to discuss with the public.
Doctors will not (and should not) be making decisions based on economics. They will always do what it best and bugger the cost. The taxpayer and the government need to decide what level of care they want and then provide it efficiently and equitably.
  Actually no, this is the difficult question you need to answer.  Let Tony Abbott speak for himself and you speak for you.  Because ultimately I expect your answer on this will be one of the issues that guide you when you cast your vote in the next Federal election.  So, lets try and answer it shall we. 

Should we let that woman die from breast cancer because she can't afford the medicine or should we, the tax payer, be prepared to pay for the medicine so she doesn't die? Whats your answer to that? 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dsmithy70
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ire futuis vobismetipsis

Posts: 13147
Newy
Gender: male
Re: Medicare: It didn't that long
Reply #39 - Feb 20th, 2014 at 1:53pm
 
ImSpartacus2 wrote on Feb 20th, 2014 at 1:38pm:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2014 at 8:18am:
They are really going after the wrong end of the system. Australias spend on primary care (GP's ) has declined as a percentage over time.
It is the spend on very very expensive high tech and high end pharmaceuticals that will cripple the system

If a drug to treat end stage breast cancer (ie prolong life by 6 months with no prospect of a cure) costs $100,000 a patient. Should this be listed on the pbs and paid for by the taxpayer. What if its 2 months, What if its 5 years.
These are the difficult questions that the government need to discuss with the public.
Doctors will not (and should not) be making decisions based on economics. They will always do what it best and bugger the cost. The taxpayer and the government need to decide what level of care they want and then provide it efficiently and equitably.
  Actually no, this is the difficult question you need to answer.  Let Tony Abbott speak for himself and you speak for you.  Because ultimately I expect your answer on this will be one of the issues that guide you when you cast your vote in the next Federal election.  So, lets try and answer it shall we. 

Should we let that woman die from breast cancer because she can't afford the medicine or should we, the tax payer, be prepared to pay for the medicine so she doesn't die? Whats your answer to that? 



Your question leaves out the most important part:

Quote:
to treat end stage breast cancer (ie prolong life by 6 months with no prospect of a cure)


Your question leaving out the above would get a resounding NO

The question in full would get a resounding YES

Our problem as a society is that apparently we are all entitled & not allowed to die.

Entitled - example - any women over 40 on IVF- have your kids when your body is supposed to.
I laugh at my friends in their late 30's early 40's having their 1st child, Im 43 my daughters just turned 18 & guess what, so have my wife & I. Cheesy

Not allowed to die - The countless examples of people being brought back even when they have stated Do not recus then linger as virtual vegetables for years.
The 90 year old Alzheimer sufferer, no idea where or what they are let alone who who has major medical intervention for anything really.

But of course we not only want the above, we want tax cuts as well.


On a personal note- my mother died from Breast Cancer  14/8/95, actually we don't know what eventually killed her as an autopsy was refused.
The breast cancer caused Peripheral neuropathy.
The screams that came from the bedroom as palliative care nurses moved her to bath her, the memory still bring tears to my eyes.

needless to say by 1/2/95 death was begged for instead of a cure or extension of life. Sad
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 20th, 2014 at 1:59pm by Dsmithy70 »  

REBELLION is not what most people think it is.
REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself.
Gavin Nascimento
 
IP Logged
 
woody2014
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2044
NTH EAST VIC
Gender: male
Re: Medicare: It didn't that long
Reply #40 - Feb 20th, 2014 at 1:54pm
 
ImSpartacus2 wrote on Feb 20th, 2014 at 1:38pm:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2014 at 8:18am:
They are really going after the wrong end of the system. Australias spend on primary care (GP's ) has declined as a percentage over time.
It is the spend on very very expensive high tech and high end pharmaceuticals that will cripple the system

If a drug to treat end stage breast cancer (ie prolong life by 6 months with no prospect of a cure) costs $100,000 a patient. Should this be listed on the pbs and paid for by the taxpayer. What if its 2 months, What if its 5 years.
These are the difficult questions that the government need to discuss with the public.
Doctors will not (and should not) be making decisions based on economics. They will always do what it best and bugger the cost. The taxpayer and the government need to decide what level of care they want and then provide it efficiently and equitably.
  Actually no, this is the difficult question you need to answer.  Let Tony Abbott speak for himself and you speak for you.  Because ultimately I expect your answer on this will be one of the issues that guide you when you cast your vote in the next Federal election.  So, lets try and answer it shall we. 

Should we let that woman die from breast cancer because she can't afford the medicine or should we, the tax payer, be prepared to pay for the medicine so she doesn't die? Whats your answer to that? 



Wink Wink  We pay for it now,, SO WHATS YOUR PROBLEM   Angry Angry
Back to top
 

THE DUMB LEFTIES ON THIS BOARD  DONT KNOW IF THERE WINDING THEIR ARSE OR SCRATCHING THEIR WATCH
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Medicare: It didn't that long
Reply #41 - Feb 20th, 2014 at 9:45am
 
No $6 fee, at least yet. What a shame, neither party has the guts to scrap or at least reduce Medicare.
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
ImSpartacus2
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6913
Re: Medicare: It didn't that long
Reply #42 - Feb 20th, 2014 at 11:25am
 
matty wrote on Feb 20th, 2014 at 9:45am:
No $6 fee, at least yet. What a shame, neither party has the guts to scrap or at least reduce Medicare.


I think before we start charging $6 to visit the doctor we need to recoup all that tax $$$$ the tax payer paid so that Matty could go to a private school instead of going to a public school like most everybody else.  Why are we starving medicare of funds to pay for this slime bag's elitist education so that he comes out of it thinking he's more entitled then everyone else.  I mean whats he done except hang off daddy's coat sleeves.  Didn't Hockey tell us that these people with their entitled attitudes need to be booted out of the country.   
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Medicare: It didn't that long
Reply #43 - Feb 20th, 2014 at 1:09pm
 
I don't even know what you're talking about, I just don't see why health care should be free. But then again, I am talking to a far-left Green voter.
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
imcrookonit
Ex Member
*



Re: Medicare: It didn't that long
Reply #44 - Feb 20th, 2014 at 1:14pm
 
Mr Dutton, has let the cat out of the bag.  Leave medicare and bulk billing alone.      Angry
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 8
Send Topic Print