Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Western Australia and Clives Position in it.. (Read 1226 times)
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Western Australia and Clives Position in it..
Feb 21st, 2014 at 3:34am
 
Since he is not pushing Fibre to the Home I don't see anything other than the exotic vote going his way..

I predict he won't get a spot in the Senate like he was looking at before the shemozzle that was and we will hear endless complaints about THE SYSTEM, ...which will probably make Australia a far better place for the debate about said SYSTEM.

  Wink
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Moderator
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38799
Gender: male
Re: Western Australia and Clives Position in it..
Reply #1 - Feb 21st, 2014 at 3:12pm
 
LNP disaffection has to go somewhere.  Logic says not to the ALP and also suggests PUP as the beneficiary......given Clive's long term very close affiliation with them.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Moderator
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38799
Gender: male
Re: Western Australia and Clives Position in it..
Reply #2 - Feb 21st, 2014 at 5:34pm
 
PUP is gearing up.

Click here.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Western Australia and Clives Position in it..
Reply #3 - Feb 23rd, 2014 at 12:32am
 
In reference to my opening post,

I wonder what Clive thinks about this:

http://delimiter.com.au/2014/02/21/pressured-turnbull-agrees-aerial-fttp-trials-...

opinion/analysis
I’ve been saying for quite some time that NBN Co must seriously consider deploying more aerial fibre, based especially on the TasCOLT trial. As I wrote for Delimiter 2.0 in mid-November last year (paywalled):

“NBN Co’s Strategic Review process gives the company an unmissable opportunity to re-evaluate the early decision to deploy its FTTP network primarily through Telstra’s underground ducts. The company and its new Coalition masters must now seriously consider deploying more fibre aerially on power poles in an effort to speed up its rollout substantially.

… Tasmania has form in this area. The State Government’s TasCOLT project saw several thousand households in several metropolitan areas in the state receive aerial fibre deployments constructed by state-owned energy utility Aurora Energy in 2006 and 2007. According to a report published in 2008, the model was successful, and Tasmania gained key learnings from the deployment that would aid in future rollouts.

Now the state is proposing that that concept be extended throughout the NBN rollout in Tasmania, in an effort to ensure that it receives FTTP broadband across the state under the NBN, and not inferior FTTN options. It’s a model Tasmania has proposed before — back in 2007 and 2008, when Kevin Rudd’s first Labor administration was examining a nationwide FTTN rollout in partnership with industry, as the first NBN plan. And now it’s back.

The thing which NBN Co’s team of executives, analysts and consultants needs to realise when considering the aerial FTTP model, as compared with the underground FTTP model which it has largely been pursuing so far, is that the model makes a hell of a lot of sense not just for Tasmania, but for the wider national NBN rollout in general.”

So with the TasCOLT experience already live to some 1,200 premises in Tasmania since 2008 or so, why the hell do we need to do further trials? It’s not like the results of that trial are not already available.

One further thing I will add: It is rather audacious of Turnbull and Hodgman to try and chalk this one up as a Liberal victory. Hodgman has only just recently drunk the FTTP “kool-aid”, after all … it was Giddings that worked on the TasCOLT project back in 2005, when the Premier was Tasmanian Minister for Economic Development. And she’s been very active since that time.

That’s almost a decade that Giddings has been pushing to get FTTP in Tasmania, and if aerial FTTP does come, it will have been almost entirely on her watch. I don’t recall Hodgman having done a lot for Tasmanian broadband in that time, and it’s a little cute of Turnbull to claim that he was persuaded by Hodgman on the issue. My view is that the fact that the issue is such as huge one on the State Election might have had a teensy weensy little bit to do with it.
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Western Australia and Clives Position in it..
Reply #4 - Apr 20th, 2014 at 12:41pm
 
Blooming hell... that episode on Lateline before the wa re-run senate election poisoned pup forever: no one bothered attacking JAQUI on qanda for her carbon emissions views as the job had already been done...

THE SYSTEM of buying the ignorant voter will have volumes of history books written about it...

This world is in a lot of trouble and 9-11 was a wake-up call!

The people lead... THE PEOPLE LEAD!!

STOP HALLUCINATING ON HOLLYWOOD AND RED WINE AND YOUR PROPERTY PORTFOLIOS AND ASK YOURSELF WHY YOU HAD KIDS!

STOP RENOVATING TO AVOID TALKING TO YOUR NEIGHBOURS YOU DRUNKARDS  Embarrassed
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print