sir prince duke alevine
|
aquascoot wrote on Feb 24 th, 2014 at 4:10pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 24 th, 2014 at 4:05pm: aquascoot wrote on Feb 24 th, 2014 at 4:02pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 24 th, 2014 at 3:56pm: aquascoot wrote on Feb 24 th, 2014 at 3:54pm: Karnal wrote on Feb 24 th, 2014 at 3:50pm: Aquascoot and Sparky say you're guilty of murder, Alevine. How do you plead? If alvine supports SHY's call for a royal commision into this one death. This would cost $30,000,000. enough to save maybe 30,000 african kids. If alvine agrees with SHY, he supports numbers of deaths equal to genocide. Shame, greenies, shame Who said I agree with the greenies, Aqua? You seem to be assuming a bit too much today. So you would agree that to do the greatest good for the greatest number is the correct policy ? So one death , when taken into the scheme of things is acceptable, if we save several billion on border security AND use some of that money in foriegn aid (where it will have a multiplier effect). The lefties need to learn maths. Mass starvation in south sudan. Let morrison kill off this $6 billion spend and ask for a billion to send to africa. win/win......we can all sleep better knowing we have created good karma No I don't accept that. Setup proper regional processing with the UNHCR in Indonesia. Either increase the refugee resettlement programme, or have a new classification for those we take directly from Indonesia. Then, fly people back to that processing centre if they circumnavigate it. 0 deaths. problem solved. funds are not unlimited. if i had 100 starving cattle who needed a bit of hay to see them through , i'd buy that before i chose one of the 100 and chartered a plane to fly him to greener pastures and let the other 99 die. makes sense to me. UNHCR spends $8,000,000 to process 10,000 people. I agree funds, aren't unlimited. Hence it's cheaper to process in Indonesia, then come up with a mash of policies that have this year cost $9,000,000,000. $8,000,000 for 10,000 people. $9,000,000,000 for ... 50,000 people? WOW. We're getting our money's worth.
|