sir prince duke alevine
|
aquascoot wrote on Feb 24 th, 2014 at 4:18pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 24 th, 2014 at 4:11pm: aquascoot wrote on Feb 24 th, 2014 at 4:10pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 24 th, 2014 at 4:05pm: aquascoot wrote on Feb 24 th, 2014 at 4:02pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 24 th, 2014 at 3:56pm: aquascoot wrote on Feb 24 th, 2014 at 3:54pm: Karnal wrote on Feb 24 th, 2014 at 3:50pm: Aquascoot and Sparky say you're guilty of murder, Alevine. How do you plead? If alvine supports SHY's call for a royal commision into this one death. This would cost $30,000,000. enough to save maybe 30,000 african kids. If alvine agrees with SHY, he supports numbers of deaths equal to genocide. Shame, greenies, shame Who said I agree with the greenies, Aqua? You seem to be assuming a bit too much today. So you would agree that to do the greatest good for the greatest number is the correct policy ? So one death , when taken into the scheme of things is acceptable, if we save several billion on border security AND use some of that money in foriegn aid (where it will have a multiplier effect). The lefties need to learn maths. Mass starvation in south sudan. Let morrison kill off this $6 billion spend and ask for a billion to send to africa. win/win......we can all sleep better knowing we have created good karma No I don't accept that. Setup proper regional processing with the UNHCR in Indonesia. Either increase the refugee resettlement programme, or have a new classification for those we take directly from Indonesia. Then, fly people back to that processing centre if they circumnavigate it. 0 deaths. problem solved. funds are not unlimited. if i had 100 starving cattle who needed a bit of hay to see them through , i'd buy that before i chose one of the 100 and chartered a plane to fly him to greener pastures and let the other 99 die. makes sense to me. UNHCR spends $8,000,000 to process 10,000 people. I agree funds, aren't unlimited. Hence it's cheaper to process in Indonesia, then come up with a mash of policies that have this year cost $9,000,000,000. $8,000,000 for 10,000 people. $9,000,000,000 for ... 50,000 people? WOW. We're getting our money's worth. indeed we are not ![Wink Wink](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/Templates/Forum/default/wink.gif) declare christmas island an uninhabited national park and relocate everyone. put the 8 billion per annum in a trust and use the profits from the trust to help "desperate people" in their country of origin. cheaper, no deaths, repairs our international reputation Do what you want with the 8billion - my point is that if UNHCR can do processing for $8 million, surely we can meet our obligations under the refugee convention in a much cheaper way than $8 billion to sooth Sparky's tensions? Or you don't believe we should meet our obligations?
|