Australian Politics Forum - Abbott must sack Morrison: Greens

Postmodern Trendoid III

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 10266
Gender: male

Re: Abbott must sack Morrison: Greens
Reply #120 - Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:54pm

rabbitoh08 wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:26pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:17pm:

"Progressives" never actually state a quota or number. If they do, they know they'll have to start making hard decisions on who should be rejected. They don't want to have that conversation, so they heckle from the side line toward those who do.

Are you telling lies on purpose?

Or are you just too lazy to bother to actually learn about stuff before opening your big mouth?

From the Greens website:
We will increase Australia's humanitarian intake to 30,000, which will make a difference and provide hope to people waiting.
By resettling to Australia an emergency intake of 10,000 more genuine refugees from our region, we can show refugees that there is a ‘regular’ path to a safe life.

http://greens.org.au/safer-pathways

and when this quota is reached and the boats keep pouring in?

Back to top

IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: Abbott must sack Morrison: Greens
Reply #121 - Mar 14^th, 2014 at 6:33pm

rabbitoh08 wrote on Mar 13^th, 2014 at 7:54am:

Try to follow the conversation. The UN is a not a "higher authority" than the federal government. The Federal Government has obligations under International Law to comply with the legally binding Conventions it is signatory to.

Do you think Tony should withdraw Australia from Australia from the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees? Then he and Scotty could do whatever they liked. Why hasn't he done that?

There is no obligation to permanently resettle anyone under any international covenant.
This is important. Focus. Don't ignore it.

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh08

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1528
Gender: male

Re: Abbott must sack Morrison: Greens
Reply #122 - Mar 14^th, 2014 at 7:26pm

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:54pm:

rabbitoh08 wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:26pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:17pm:

"Progressives" never actually state a quota or number. If they do, they know they'll have to start making hard decisions on who should be rejected. They don't want to have that conversation, so they heckle from the side line toward those who do.

Are you telling lies on purpose?

Or are you just too lazy to bother to actually learn about stuff before opening your big mouth?

From the Greens website:
We will increase Australia's humanitarian intake to 30,000, which will make a difference and provide hope to people waiting.
By resettling to Australia an emergency intake of 10,000 more genuine refugees from our region, we can show refugees that there is a ‘regular’ path to a safe life.

http://greens.org.au/safer-pathways

and when this quota is reached and the boats keep pouring in?

You didn't answer the question. Are you telling lies on purpose? Or are you just too lazy to bother to actually learn about stuff before opening your big mouth?

You have made 2 statements that you cannot support,:

- "Progressives" never actually state a quota or number.- - And "Progressives" are all for Opening up the borders to anyone who wants to come here

I think you need to apologise for telling lies before you start trying to ask any questions yourself. That is reasonable isn't it?

And WTF is a "progressive" anyway?!?! - How does wanting Australia to meet it international legal obligations make one "progressive"?

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 35090
Gender: male

Re: Abbott must sack Morrison: Greens
Reply #123 - Mar 14^th, 2014 at 7:42pm

rabbitoh08 wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:26pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:17pm:

"Progressives" never actually state a quota or number. If they do, they know they'll have to start making hard decisions on who should be rejected. They don't want to have that conversation, so they heckle from the side line toward those who do.

Are you telling lies on purpose?

Or are you just too lazy to bother to actually learn about stuff before opening your big mouth?

From the Greens website:
We will increase Australia's humanitarian intake to 30,000, which will make a difference and provide hope to people waiting.
By resettling to Australia an emergency intake of 10,000 more genuine refugees from our region, we can show refugees that there is a ‘regular’ path to a safe life.

http://greens.org.au/safer-pathways

I am happy to increase the herd by 10,000. I will be requiring the very best of stock though as the pasture is under a good deal of pressure.
Fine stock from scandinavia, the USA, east asia. These are valuable for my breeding program. The greens understand , i hope, that we cant just have feral pests settled in these valuable pastures. Not unless we want the whole farm to go to sh^^t. I'll be sending my bloodstock agent, scott morrsion to assess just who we should take to improve the herd. He's a good man with an eye for excellence. My old bloodstock agent , a Miss Hansen Young has been sacked. Her eyesight is obviously deficient and she sent me a truckload of useless stock. Had to ship them to the live cattle markets in New Guinea. Four corners were none to happy.

Back to top

IP Logged

5.56_ NATO

Full Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 123
Gender: male

Re: Abbott must sack Morrison: Greens
Reply #124 - Mar 14^th, 2014 at 10:02pm

aquascoot wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 7:42pm:

rabbitoh08 wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:26pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:17pm:

"Progressives" never actually state a quota or number. If they do, they know they'll have to start making hard decisions on who should be rejected. They don't want to have that conversation, so they heckle from the side line toward those who do.

Are you telling lies on purpose?

Or are you just too lazy to bother to actually learn about stuff before opening your big mouth?

From the Greens website:
We will increase Australia's humanitarian intake to 30,000, which will make a difference and provide hope to people waiting.
By resettling to Australia an emergency intake of 10,000 more genuine refugees from our region, we can show refugees that there is a ‘regular’ path to a safe life.

http://greens.org.au/safer-pathways

I am happy to increase the herd by 10,000. I will be requiring the very best of stock though as the pasture is under a good deal of pressure.
Fine stock from scandinavia, the USA, east asia. These are valuable for my breeding program. The greens understand , i hope, that we cant just have feral pests settled in these valuable pastures. Not unless we want the whole farm to go to sh^^t. I'll be sending my bloodstock agent, scott morrsion to assess just who we should take to improve the herd. He's a good man with an eye for excellence. My old bloodstock agent , a Miss Hansen Young has been sacked. Her eyesight is obviously deficient and she sent me a truckload of useless stock. Had to ship them to the live cattle markets in New Guinea. Four corners were none to happy.

+1

Almost sounds like a piss take.. HOWEVER ,there is nothing as serious as a joke .

Back to top

IP Logged

Postmodern Trendoid III

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 10266
Gender: male

Re: Abbott must sack Morrison: Greens
Reply #125 - Mar 14^th, 2014 at 11:54pm

rabbitoh08 wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 7:26pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:54pm:

rabbitoh08 wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:26pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:17pm:

"Progressives" never actually state a quota or number. If they do, they know they'll have to start making hard decisions on who should be rejected. They don't want to have that conversation, so they heckle from the side line toward those who do.

Are you telling lies on purpose?

Or are you just too lazy to bother to actually learn about stuff before opening your big mouth?

From the Greens website:
We will increase Australia's humanitarian intake to 30,000, which will make a difference and provide hope to people waiting.
By resettling to Australia an emergency intake of 10,000 more genuine refugees from our region, we can show refugees that there is a ‘regular’ path to a safe life.

http://greens.org.au/safer-pathways

and when this quota is reached and the boats keep pouring in?

You didn't answer the question. Are you telling lies on purpose? Or are you just too lazy to bother to actually learn about stuff before opening your big mouth?

You have made 2 statements that you cannot support,:

- "Progressives" never actually state a quota or number.- - And "Progressives" are all for Opening up the borders to anyone who wants to come here

I think you need to apologise for telling lies before you start trying to ask any questions yourself. That is reasonable isn't it?

And WTF is a "progressive" anyway?!?! - How does wanting Australia to meet it international legal obligations make one "progressive"?

and when this 30,000 quota is reached and the boats keep coming? You'll either have to 'stop the boats' by 'turning them back' or open up the borders and install a higher quota. Of course, choosing the first options makes you as 'evil' as those supposed rednecks you despise, and the second option is never ending, because you'll have to lift the quota every time it is reached.

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh08

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1528
Gender: male

Re: Abbott must sack Morrison: Greens
Reply #126 - Mar 15^th, 2014 at 12:19am

aquascoot wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 7:42pm:

rabbitoh08 wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:26pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:17pm:

"Progressives" never actually state a quota or number. If they do, they know they'll have to start making hard decisions on who should be rejected. They don't want to have that conversation, so they heckle from the side line toward those who do.

Are you telling lies on purpose?

Or are you just too lazy to bother to actually learn about stuff before opening your big mouth?

From the Greens website:
We will increase Australia's humanitarian intake to 30,000, which will make a difference and provide hope to people waiting.
By resettling to Australia an emergency intake of 10,000 more genuine refugees from our region, we can show refugees that there is a ‘regular’ path to a safe life.

http://greens.org.au/safer-pathways

I am happy to increase the herd by 10,000. I will be requiring the very best of stock though as the pasture is under a good deal of pressure.
Fine stock from scandinavia, the USA, east asia. These are valuable for my breeding program. The greens understand , i hope, that we cant just have feral pests settled in these valuable pastures. Not unless we want the whole farm to go to sh^^t. I'll be sending my bloodstock agent, scott morrsion to assess just who we should take to improve the herd. He's a good man with an eye for excellence. My old bloodstock agent , a Miss Hansen Young has been sacked. Her eyesight is obviously deficient and she sent me a truckload of useless stock. Had to ship them to the live cattle markets in New Guinea. Four corners were none to happy.

You still haven't answered the question. Are you telling lies on purpose? Or are you just too lazy to bother to actually learn about stuff before opening your big mouth?

You have made 2 statements that you cannot support,:

- "Progressives" never actually state a quota or number.- - And
"Progressives" are all for Opening up the borders to anyone who wants to come here

Stop telling lies - and someone may engage you in conversation.

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh08

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1528
Gender: male

Re: Abbott must sack Morrison: Greens
Reply #127 - Mar 15^th, 2014 at 12:24am

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 11:54pm:

rabbitoh08 wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 7:26pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:54pm:

rabbitoh08 wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:26pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:17pm:

"Progressives" never actually state a quota or number. If they do, they know they'll have to start making hard decisions on who should be rejected. They don't want to have that conversation, so they heckle from the side line toward those who do.

Are you telling lies on purpose?

Or are you just too lazy to bother to actually learn about stuff before opening your big mouth?

From the Greens website:
We will increase Australia's humanitarian intake to 30,000, which will make a difference and provide hope to people waiting.
By resettling to Australia an emergency intake of 10,000 more genuine refugees from our region, we can show refugees that there is a ‘regular’ path to a safe life.

http://greens.org.au/safer-pathways

and when this quota is reached and the boats keep pouring in?

You didn't answer the question. Are you telling lies on purpose? Or are you just too lazy to bother to actually learn about stuff before opening your big mouth?

You have made 2 statements that you cannot support,:

- "Progressives" never actually state a quota or number.- - And "Progressives" are all for Opening up the borders to anyone who wants to come here

I think you need to apologise for telling lies before you start trying to ask any questions yourself. That is reasonable isn't it?

And WTF is a "progressive" anyway?!?! - How does wanting Australia to meet it international legal obligations make one "progressive"?

and when this 30,000 quota is reached and the boats keep coming? You'll either have to 'stop the boats' by 'turning them back' or open up the borders and install a higher quota. Of course, choosing the first options makes you as 'evil' as those supposed rednecks you despise, and the second option is never ending, because you'll have to lift the quota every time it is reached.

Do you think that asylum seekers are just going to magically disappear just because Scott Morrison hides behind his pet military and allows them to be murdered under his care?

They are still there. They will still come.

And in even greater numbers as the climate change that Tony Abbott is trying to deny gets worse.

Scott Morrison and his pet military cannot hide them from you forever. Don't you think it is about time Australia started acting like grown-ups about this issue?

Back to top

IP Logged

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: Abbott must sack Morrison: Greens Reply #128 - Mar 15^th, 2014 at 10:41am rabbitoh08 wrote on Mar 15^th, 2014 at 12:24am: Don't you think it is about time Australia started acting like grown-ups about this issue? Like let in anyone who wants to come? Parenting (being grown up) is to set limits to the little people.
Back to top	IP Logged

rabbitoh08

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1528
Gender: male

Re: Abbott must sack Morrison: Greens
Reply #129 - Mar 15^th, 2014 at 10:57am

Soren wrote on Mar 15^th, 2014 at 10:41am:

rabbitoh08 wrote on Mar 15^th, 2014 at 12:24am:

Don't you think it is about time Australia started acting like grown-ups about this issue?

Like let in anyone who wants to come?

Parenting (being grown up) is to set limits to the little people.

Who has suggested "letting in anyone who wants to come"?!?

Please stop building silly strawmen

Back to top

IP Logged

Postmodern Trendoid III

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 10266
Gender: male

Re: Abbott must sack Morrison: Greens
Reply #130 - Mar 15^th, 2014 at 11:17am

rabbitoh08 wrote on Mar 15^th, 2014 at 12:24am:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 11:54pm:

rabbitoh08 wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 7:26pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:54pm:

rabbitoh08 wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:26pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:17pm:

"Progressives" never actually state a quota or number. If they do, they know they'll have to start making hard decisions on who should be rejected. They don't want to have that conversation, so they heckle from the side line toward those who do.

Are you telling lies on purpose?

Or are you just too lazy to bother to actually learn about stuff before opening your big mouth?

From the Greens website:
We will increase Australia's humanitarian intake to 30,000, which will make a difference and provide hope to people waiting.
By resettling to Australia an emergency intake of 10,000 more genuine refugees from our region, we can show refugees that there is a ‘regular’ path to a safe life.

http://greens.org.au/safer-pathways

and when this quota is reached and the boats keep pouring in?

You didn't answer the question. Are you telling lies on purpose? Or are you just too lazy to bother to actually learn about stuff before opening your big mouth?

You have made 2 statements that you cannot support,:

- "Progressives" never actually state a quota or number.- - And "Progressives" are all for Opening up the borders to anyone who wants to come here

I think you need to apologise for telling lies before you start trying to ask any questions yourself. That is reasonable isn't it?

And WTF is a "progressive" anyway?!?! - How does wanting Australia to meet it international legal obligations make one "progressive"?

and when this 30,000 quota is reached and the boats keep coming? You'll either have to 'stop the boats' by 'turning them back' or open up the borders and install a higher quota. Of course, choosing the first options makes you as 'evil' as those supposed rednecks you despise, and the second option is never ending, because you'll have to lift the quota every time it is reached.

Do you think that asylum seekers are just going to magically disappear just because Scott Morrison hides behind his pet military and allows them to be murdered under his care?

They are still there. They will still come.

And in even greater numbers as the climate change that Tony Abbott is trying to deny gets worse.

Scott Morrison and his pet military cannot hide them from you forever. Don't you think it is about time Australia started acting like grown-ups about this issue?

Now we're back to my original point of heckling from the side line rather than providing any practical solution.

Back to top

IP Logged

Psycho analist

New Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 49
Gender: male

Re: Abbott must sack Morrison: Greens
Reply #131 - Mar 15^th, 2014 at 11:42am

Dear Mr rabidoh8, I zink you vill definitely benefit from being analized on my couch. I can almost taste your bitterness from here! I haz a few spots open at zee moment but I'm afraid you vill have to vait vile I tend to some other very sick individuals I haz found here

No1 is Mr Arsie who iz von very disturbing individual.
No2 is Carnal because you is desperate to be analized
No3 is Mr John Spite who haz some deep seated issues as I am sure you already know.
No4 is now Mr rabidoh8

You and Mr Spite can fight it out between you as to who iz number 3 and 4 az your level of disturbation and desperate need for being analized is on a level pegging.

You vould need to do zomething particularly heinous to beat Mr Arsie for zee No1 position like skinning babies vith your teeth.

Back to top

IP Logged

Peter Freedman

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5275
Wellington
Gender: male

Re: Abbott must sack Morrison: Greens
Reply #132 - Mar 15^th, 2014 at 12:07pm

Taipan wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2014 at 11:19pm:

The UN is a NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATION and whatever document was signed back in 1951 certainly wasn't signed with the population knowing about it.

The UN is a rogue anti-White racist organisation created by elitists and Zionists FOR the benefit of elitists and Zionists. They are our enemies.

Hmm. Anti semitism from a character who sports a swastika as his avatar.

What a surprise.

Back to top

God grant me the patience to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can and, above all, the wisdom to tell the difference.

IP Logged

rabbitoh08

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1528
Gender: male

Re: Abbott must sack Morrison: Greens
Reply #133 - Mar 15^th, 2014 at 12:58pm

Taipan wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2014 at 11:19pm:

The UN is a NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATION and whatever document was signed back in 1951 certainly wasn't signed with the population knowing about it.

Unless the population happened to read the newspapers of the day:
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/imageservice/nla.news-page3825001/print

Back to top

IP Logged

5.56_ NATO

Full Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 123
Gender: male

Re: Abbott must sack Morrison: Greens
Reply #134 - Mar 15^th, 2014 at 6:05pm

rabbitoh08 wrote on Mar 15^th, 2014 at 12:24am:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 11:54pm:

rabbitoh08 wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 7:26pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:54pm:

rabbitoh08 wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:26pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 14^th, 2014 at 5:17pm:

"Progressives" never actually state a quota or number. If they do, they know they'll have to start making hard decisions on who should be rejected. They don't want to have that conversation, so they heckle from the side line toward those who do.

Are you telling lies on purpose?

Or are you just too lazy to bother to actually learn about stuff before opening your big mouth?

From the Greens website:
We will increase Australia's humanitarian intake to 30,000, which will make a difference and provide hope to people waiting.
By resettling to Australia an emergency intake of 10,000 more genuine refugees from our region, we can show refugees that there is a ‘regular’ path to a safe life.

http://greens.org.au/safer-pathways

and when this quota is reached and the boats keep pouring in?

You didn't answer the question. Are you telling lies on purpose? Or are you just too lazy to bother to actually learn about stuff before opening your big mouth?

You have made 2 statements that you cannot support,:

- "Progressives" never actually state a quota or number.- - And "Progressives" are all for Opening up the borders to anyone who wants to come here

I think you need to apologise for telling lies before you start trying to ask any questions yourself. That is reasonable isn't it?

And WTF is a "progressive" anyway?!?! - How does wanting Australia to meet it international legal obligations make one "progressive"?

and when this 30,000 quota is reached and the boats keep coming? You'll either have to 'stop the boats' by 'turning them back' or open up the borders and install a higher quota. Of course, choosing the first options makes you as 'evil' as those supposed rednecks you despise, and the second option is never ending, because you'll have to lift the quota every time it is reached.

Do you think that asylum seekers are just going to magically disappear just because Scott Morrison hides behind his pet military and allows them to be murdered under his care?

They are still there. They will still come.

And in even greater numbers as the climate change that Tony Abbott is trying to deny gets worse.

Scott Morrison and his pet military cannot hide them from you forever. Don't you think it is about time Australia started acting like grown-ups about this issue?

One illegal booga was alledgedly killed by persons unknown, possibly his own countrymen. A qualified architect who was able to study and obtain a degree in his own oh so awful country..you are a dead set peanut blinded by your leftist retarded un Australian zeal. You should be happy one less sumbitch needs feeding

Back to top

IP Logged