it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 3
rd, 2017 at 9:56am:
In an effort to "up my game" I've formatted this post to be more like Light's
only with facts.Another video showing airborne firefighting equipment as proof of chemtrailing and commenting on scientific studies without providing any further information about them or to them, let alone any peer reviewed findings also known as "Not proving their claims", aka more FAKE NEWS by it_is_the_light
There is a clear anti-climate change message being pushed by the YouTuber, the same person who claims that NASA are covering up aliens on the Moon. He wants the viewer to follow the money trail back to Al Gore, I suggest the YouTuber's motivation for posting such lies and duping stupid people be investigated instead.
On top of that they take an out of context comment from CIA director John O. Brennan at the Council on Foreign Relations mentioned geoengineering, specifically stratospheric aerosol injection.
Claim: CIA director John O. Brennan admits geoengineering in the form of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) is taking place, ie "chemtrails".
Nowhere in his
speech is there an "admission" that a SAI program is already taking place. The part where Brennan mentions geoengineering is just one example out of several, not-often-mentioned issues that CIA monitors for potential (future) elements of instability in the world. A SAI program, if ever implemented, could generate conflicts and security threats if misused. It's CIA's job to consider all types of concepts for potential future problems and threats, including science oriented concepts.
Reading the whole
transcript, and the relevant parts, it becomes clear that when Brennan brings up geoengineering, he is talking about future concepts, that may never be put into practice:
This is the context of the speech:
Quote:I’ll start with the overarching challenge of instability, which continues to grip large sections of the globe.
Global instability is one of the defining issues of our time, and its implications are hard to overstate. As instability spreads, extremists and terrorists are finding sanctuary in ungoverned spaces. Energy supplies are being disrupted. Political reform is suffering as too many governments opt for authoritarian measures at the expense of democratic principles and respect for human rights.
Here is the part where SAI is mentioned. Emphasis (highlight) has been added where there are clear indications how Brennan is talking about something that
would be, could be a potential future thing:
Quote:Another example is the array of technologies—often referred to collectively as geoengineering—that potentially couldhelp reverse the warming effects of global climate change.
[...]
An SAI program could limit global temperature increases, reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures and providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels.
[...]
As promising as it may be, moving forward on SAI would raise a number of challenges for our government and for the international community. On the technical side, greenhouse gas emission reductions would still have to accompany SAI to address other climate change effects, such as ocean acidification, because SAI alone would not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
On the geopolitical side, the technology’s potential to alter weather patterns and benefit certain regions at the expense of others could trigger sharp opposition by some nations. Others might seize on SAI’s benefits and back away from their commitment to carbon dioxide reductions. And, as with other breakthrough technologies, global norms and standards are lacking to guide the deployment and implementation of SAI.
It is quite clear that John O. Brennan does not talk about something that is already implemented. He talks about merely suggested technology that might be useful, but bot implemented and may never be, in the challenge against abrupt anthropogenic global warming.
Brennan also raised the issues with the proposed technology from a security perspective, which is what the CIA deals with every day.
This is nothing new. The goals and the problems of the proposed SAI technology is something that has been openly stated and discussed, both science and political-wise for more than a decade now. Brennan does not provide any new information on the subject.
"CIA CONFIRMS CHEMTRAILS ARE REAL AND ARE DEPLOYED RIGHT NOW!"?
Swing and a miss, again..
Namaste
▲
Forum
Pages: 
