Stig wrote on Jun 5^th, 2017 at 12:01pm:


Poor Jack, reverting to sock status to post sh!t........

Stig wrote on Jun 5^th, 2017 at 12:42pm:

ChemTrail Proof: 2 guys in Jet catches them spraying Chemicals Trails ~ Chem Trails ~ (mirror)

check out @ 46 seconds .. they stop spraying ..

@ 1:20 they start up spraying again ..

SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 5^th, 2017 at 2:46pm:


oh yes that is " natetalkstoyou "..

he also gives you great advice on what porn to watch

I do NOT watch porn or conduct the self abuse ritual that is satanic in nature that coincides with that self abuse.

he is a shill and a propaganda piece for satan essentially

supporting big government narrative and backing it up with government sponsored " science "

this fake news you support and post is all debunked here

What in the World Are They Spraying? (Full Length HD Version)

also here are some concerned Pilots, Doctors & Scientists..

why would they give false testimony and subject themself to ridicule ??

Pilots, Doctors & Scientists Tell Truth about Chemtrails [Excerpts]

Quote:

▲

Proof of Chemtrails found in QLD!

Oh look, a cloud formation from Thornlands QLD on Tuesday and I don't understand the science behind its formation.  Must be malfunctioning chemtrails or the pilot turning it off and back on again multiple times..!

I don't have any evidence to suggest that it is a chemtrail but I'll dismiss any questions relating to that as trolling, attacks from abusers or I'll ignore it complete and start posting more "evidence". 

But on top of that, it's the lack of any other possilbe explanation due to my own limited understanding of the world and my desire for this to be proof of chemtrails meaning I am special because I've stumbled onto a hidden truth that only proves it must be chemtrails. 

Solid proof!

Now to share it all over social media until someone else shares it so I can share their share to it doesn't look like I made it up!

it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 8^th, 2017 at 10:00am:


I didn't realise the use of "sarcasm" tags would have been nessisary...  Not sure if you're trolling or your confirmation bias is getting in the way as usual?

Other than your opinion, do you have have any evidence to suggest that the cloud formation is "not natural" or do you simply want them to be not natural?

And as for Kristen Meghan, she's already explained that her "whistleblowing" was nothing to do with chemtrails, it was to do with exposure to chemicals at air bases. She has since become involved in the chemtrail theory, but her talking points are the usual debunked ones from the internet.

She has offered no proof or evidence to what people are attributing to her claims of chemtrails, she's even admitted she's never seen and of the chemicals she talks about ever be loaded onto or even near any aircraft on the base.  Her initial concerns were that the chemicals and other hazardous materials on the base were finding their way into the surrounding environment and as she lived at the time of a properly neighbouring the base she was conducting tests in her own back yard.

What she failed to understand is that aluminium is natually found in air, soil and water without the need for chemtrails and lab tests will reveal that but those results speak nothing to the toxicity of the aluminium.

People often get confused regarding the toxicity of aluminium. Some aluminium compounds are not harmful. They are a common ingredient in antacids, for instance. On the other hand, the ionic form (Al+++) is very toxic to both people and plants.

So getting lab results that show traces of Al won't show if the Al was in a toxic form or not, nor will it show if the Al originated from soils or sprayed from planes.

But from your point of view light, does any of that matter to you or don't you need any evidence to support your claims?

it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 8^th, 2017 at 11:42am:


I'm not ignoring anything, you've just not provided any evidence.  You have posted a lot, and I mean a lot (and that's ignoring the gargantuan volume of reposts) but nothing has yet stood up to the most basic of scrutiny and you yourself keep running from questioning.

If you case was so clear cut you shouldn't have to employ the tactics of someone trying to sell a broken down used car as good as new.

You're providing videos that show the opinions of people who hold enormous gaps in their understand of basic physics and science in general who are using "chemtrails" to fill in the gaps and none of their opinions are formed from provable fact or repeatable scientific experiment. 

None.  Not a single one.

As usual you've never even cited primary sources and at best have only shown us the opinions of people who have made their minds up that chemtrails are real, they exist and it's a global government conspiracy to control the people.  No amount of facts or evidence around the truth of the phenomena they proport as chemtrails explaining each and every one of their claims as naturally occurring or at least explained by science will change their mind.

And you're one of them.

"That naturally forming cloud looks different from what I consider "normal" clouds, must be chemtrails!"

No matter how hard you try you cannot lower the standard of what is considered provable fact and evidence simply to try and prove that Chemtrails are real.  You'll need to actually prove it, which so far you've not come close to being able to show, but a loooooong shot.

You're still ignoring the fact that you've blamed the casualties from the Melbourne Pollen Storm on Chemtrails and cloud seeding.  You have no evidence to back it up, you just want it to be true to help prove your case for Chemtrails.  Yet you won't take back the claim or apologise.  You're still pushing that demonstrably false line. 

You're a liar and a fraud.

I've said it many times before, as have others, what you've posted as your "proof" are nothing but the opinions of others and are not facts, they're not evidence.  If you want to accuse people of ignoring your evidence, you'll have to post some first.

As for ignoring, I've posted explanations to many of the phenomena you have claimed are "proof" of chemtrails and provided you with the sources to back it up.  If anything has been ignored in this thread it has been that, by you.

Again, you know you're in the wrong and you're trying to accuse others of your own deeds and failings before they have the chance to accuse you, presumably to lessen the impacts when they try to hold you to account.

The facts speak for themselves.  You're a liar and a fraud who does nothing but spread fake news.

latest water test : tested the rain , 13,100 micrograms per litre of aluminium in the rain in 2013 ..normally it should be zero "


Usually the testing is so shoddy the results can be ignored.