The_Barnacle wrote on Mar 15
th, 2014 at 9:42am:
Taipan wrote on Mar 15
th, 2014 at 8:29am:
Obviously you missed the part that says "UN Weather Weapons Treaty."
Well there is no "UN Weather Weapons Treaty". You must be referring to the Environmental Modification Convention of 1977. It prohibits the use of any environmental or geophysical modification activity as a weapon of war. This Treaty covers a broad range of environmental modifications.
Taipan wrote on Mar 15
th, 2014 at 8:29am:
You see a sane person would ask the question "Why is there such a treaty?"
If there's a weather weapons treaty then obviously there are "weather weapons".
Any sane person wouldn't assume that a treaty was evidence that these so called weapons are being used.Its a bit like saying that because there is a nuclear weapons treaty that this is evidence that nuclear weapons are being used on the general population.
Well if you're going to be pedantic about it I actually didn't say they are being used in my post that you quoted, I said
If there's a weather weapons treaty then obviously there are "weather weapons".
But you are wrong though. A sane person isn't dumb enough to assume that they aren't being used and not even ponder on the question of wether or not they are being used.
Indoctrinated people are not sane. They might not appear to be crazy people but that doesn't mean they are sane.
You have lived your life among such people and have also received the same indoctrination as everyone else so you can be forgiven for having a somewhat flawed view on what sanity is.
When you have a non-governmental organisation come into being calling itself the united nations and start acting as though it is a global authority and everyone just accepts it then that's a good indication that most people are not sane.
Furthermore, the treaty may be called the
The United Nations CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF MILITARY OR ANY OTHER HOSTILE USE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES, but it is also known as the UN Weather Weapons Treaty 1976.
But in that treaty they state that it is against 'international law' for countries to use weather warfare against other countries BUT it says nothing about governments using weather warfare on its own people.