John Smith wrote on Mar 13
th, 2014 at 10:20am:
Yes, JS, but we have different standards of conduct on this board. The rest of Australia has things call laws. On this board, we have what Scott Morrison has termed "behaviour protocols".
We also have different criteria. Sex offenders here are known as "Moslems". Girls in underage relationships with men are known as "victims of criminal Islam". Isolated individuals are known as "Moslem gangs".
And yes, we also have different evidentiary standards. Evidence of guilt in Australia can be proven with an unrelated news article from the UK. Better still are stories of rapes and killings in places like Afghanistan and Pakistan. These are used to prove guilt in Australia.
The most important evidence of all, of course, is Islam itself. Islam, you see, is a toxic and despicable religion. The evidence for this is crime by non-Muslims. The fact that they are non-Muslim is irrelevant, as Sparky here asserts. What is important is that Islam is criticized at all costs.
This, you see, proves that Islam is a toxic and despicable religion, which provides evidence for non-crimes. If there are no crimes at all, we can safely assume that there are because Islam has been proved to be a toxic and despicable religion using non-Muslim crimes.
Do you see how we work here now?