Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 17
Send Topic Print
Why Nations Fail (Read 36223 times)
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10266
Gender: male
Re: Why Nations Fail
Reply #75 - Mar 16th, 2014 at 6:33pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 16th, 2014 at 4:08pm:
Yet it is necessary to communicate what went on. It was barbaric, whether or not everyone else was being barbaric at the same time. Instead of getting all hung up on whether it is OK to judge it, why not just call it for what it is and get over it?


You're also under the false impression that there's a timeless form of morality, and it happens to be the one you hold here in 2014. A cursory read of history shows countless moralities.

Quote:
False dichotomy. One person can call it oppression. Another can call it gifting a superior culture by force. Neither is a barrier to insight. The only barrier to insight is people like you who whine about the shame they feel.


Any shame is your projection. I feel more pride than shame.
Yet, when I am in analytical mode, I feel little.

Quote:
Slavery could become normal again. All it takes is to make it more common. Would that also make it moral?


Morality is all perspective.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Why Nations Fail
Reply #76 - Mar 16th, 2014 at 6:46pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 16th, 2014 at 4:08pm:
Quote:
It prompted him to ask the question (now known as the Needham question) "Why had China been overtaken by the West in science and technology, despite its earlier successes?"


Jared Diamond answered this question in "Guns, Germs and Steel", with another go at it in "Collapse" I think.

As did Simon Winchester, although maybe less assured than Diamond, in 'Bomb, Book and Compass' his biography of Needham.

freediver wrote on Mar 16th, 2014 at 4:08pm:
Quote:
None of this is unusual about empire... as dictators never willingly relinquish power... Imperialists never surrender the empire they serve except at the point of a gun, or due to the impossibility of holding it together.


I think you'll find that Britain gave up India more readily than just about any empire in history, and has continued to benefit greatly from that move.

Actually Churchill begged Truman and Eisenhower for the Empire back and they agreed but only on the proviso that they allow full independence to any colony that requested it. There was a plan to retain India but with no money and the horrors of WW2 still fresh in British minds (including the holocaust) there was not the national will, nor the national belief in Empire, to carry it out. Of course, if the Americans were saying no, it wouldn't have mattered what the British national will was. The US was the new leader and its will be done.

freediver wrote on Mar 16th, 2014 at 4:08pm:
Quote:
What is the excuse of large companies today (e.g. Apple) who happily allow Chinese workers to endure slave-like conditions to build their products cheaply?


You already know what the "excuse" is - that those Chinese are actually better off for Apples' employment of them. There is no coercion.

Yes that'll do. Without reference to the obvious - that those Apple products are cheaper... Seems like the same sentiments govern us today as governed the southern states of the US. Cheap labour, cheap cotton.
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Why Nations Fail
Reply #77 - Mar 16th, 2014 at 6:56pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Mar 16th, 2014 at 2:29pm:
NorthOfNorth wrote on Mar 16th, 2014 at 2:11pm:
Awww, come on...Don't throw teddy in the dirt!

All this defending of your ex-pat sense of superiority is making you petulant. You don't have to fight so hard for the old Empire...



Oh come on, helian!  We both know you're one of a great many Vichy Brits and Aussies who are committed to an ideological version of British and Australian history that has no room for anything other than damnation and eternal penance for the sins of the past.

We both know, do we?

I haven't cried 'shame, shame, shame and Britain is to blame'...

I think you're over-reactive in your defence of Britain. But, then again, the end of the British Empire is still within some peoples' lifetime. The Austrians were peeved about the loss of theirs too and were only too happy to join the German Reich in the naïve belief that they were reclaiming their greatness.

Now they couldn't give a turd about the Austro-Hungarian empire, nor whether anyone criticises it. That, to them, has faded into history. I'm betting there's no geriatric Frenchman sitting in a café getting uppity about defending Napoleon's empire either.

The British Empire is still within your living memory, I'm guessing, so find a café and defend away...
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49016
At my desk.
Re: Why Nations Fail
Reply #78 - Mar 16th, 2014 at 7:02pm
 
Quote:
what does 'fail' mean?  it sounds very much like a very subjective word.


The authors do not actually use the word in the book. The subtitle on the book is more reflective of the content: "The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty". It is really about relative wealth.

Quote:
However, under the modern conception of Human Rights, it would be considered, by Westerners, to be a form of slavery.


I am a westerner. I do not consider it slavery. Words have meanings. Use them.

Quote:
Actually I have, and probably before you were born. In those days the books in the NSW State library


Ah I see your problem. It's not the academics. It's that you want the books for free, paid for by the government, but spinning history your way, and not forgetting to bag Islam in a history of the British Empire.

Quote:
You're also under the false impression that there's a timeless form of morality


It was barbaric. I am calling it barbaric. I don't need to have a debate on the philosophy of morality to do that. I am simply calling a spade a spade. I find it helps to communicate the reality of world history if we are honest about where we come from. It certainly helps in avoiding going back there.

Quote:
As did Simon Winchester, although maybe less assured than Diamond, in 'Bomb, Book and Compass' his biography of Needham.


Was it the same theory?

Quote:
Yes that'll do. Without reference to the obvious - that those Apple products are cheaper... Seems like the same sentiments govern us today as governed the southern states of the US. Cheap labour, cheap cotton.


That was actual slavery. Are the Chinese coerced? I am not a fan of Chinese politics, but I am not going to call them slaves in an attempt to prove a vapid point.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Why Nations Fail
Reply #79 - Mar 16th, 2014 at 7:20pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 16th, 2014 at 4:08pm:
... why not just call it for what it is and get over it?


Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 16th, 2014 at 6:33pm:
You're also under the false impression that there's a timeless form of morality, and it happens to be the one you hold here in 2014. A cursory read of history shows countless moralities.


Very astute observation.

One dimensional moral minimalists such as your dancing partner here, are legion. If you don't keep it really simple, and not be 'difficult' ~ they're apt to start telling you "you're full of it" ... and they "can tell"Grin

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 16th, 2014 at 6:33pm:
Any shame is your projection.


Nice counter-punch. Go for the 'rear naked choke' (RNC) when you see an opening.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Why Nations Fail
Reply #80 - Mar 16th, 2014 at 7:39pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Mar 16th, 2014 at 7:20pm:
they're apt to start telling you "you're full of it" ... and they "can tell"

One of those Freudian moments, I think...
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Why Nations Fail
Reply #81 - Mar 16th, 2014 at 7:46pm
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on Mar 16th, 2014 at 7:39pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Mar 16th, 2014 at 7:20pm:
they're apt to start telling you "you're full of it" ... and they "can tell"

One of those Freudian moments, I think...


Exactly.

A clear case of 'projection', as Culture Warrior so correctly observed.

I'm hoping to see a little 'ground-and-pound' from Cultural Warrior once he trips up his dancing partner in this thread.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Why Nations Fail
Reply #82 - Mar 16th, 2014 at 7:50pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Mar 16th, 2014 at 7:46pm:
NorthOfNorth wrote on Mar 16th, 2014 at 7:39pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Mar 16th, 2014 at 7:20pm:
they're apt to start telling you "you're full of it" ... and they "can tell"

One of those Freudian moments, I think...


Exactly.

A clear case of 'projection', as Culture Warrior so correctly observed.

It just gets Freudier and Freudier!!!
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Why Nations Fail
Reply #83 - Mar 17th, 2014 at 5:43am
 
I'm not all gung-ho! about the British Empire as some would like to tar-and-feather me as being. Objecting to a Black Armband version of British history is not the same as being a one-eyed fanatic.

I've worked with nine .... let me repeat that: nine immigrant ethnicities whose countries had been militarily assisting Nazi Germany in wiping out democratic sovereign nations one after the other, and making slaves of those who were fit to work in armament factories and on the farms, and genocidally murdering the rest.

Nine. Working alongside me here in Australia.

I've talked to those who were railroaded to Hitler's factories. I've talked to those who survived Hitler's death camps.

No one mentions a word about these people and the evils their nations assisted with in such recent times.

But mention what the Brits did in shooting a few Abos who were persistently stealing sheep and cattle from settler farmers out in the bushlands where the living was precarious to say the least ~ and EVERYONE starts baying for blood and asking that their Australian descendants should hang their heads in shame, and have a 'Sorry Day'.

The hypocrisy and cherry-picking is pathological.





Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sherri
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 746
Melbourne, Australia
Gender: female
Re: Why Nations Fail
Reply #84 - Mar 17th, 2014 at 5:59am
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Mar 17th, 2014 at 5:43am:
I'm not all gung-ho! about the British Empire as some would like to tar-and-feather me as being. Objecting to a Black Armband version of British history is not the same as being a one-eyed fanatic.

I've worked with nine .... let me repeat that: nine immigrant ethnicities whose countries had been militarily assisting Nazi Germany in wiping out democratic sovereign nations one after the other, and making slaves of those who were fit to work in armament factories and on the farms, and genocidally murdering the rest.

Nine. Working alongside me here in Australia.

I've talked to those who were railroaded to Hitler's factories. I've talked to those who survived Hitler's death camps.

No one mentions a word about these people and the evils their nations assisted with in such recent times.

But mention what the Brits did in shooting a few Abos who were persistently stealing sheep and cattle from settler farmers out in the bushlands where the living was precarious to say the least ~ and EVERYONE starts baying for blood and asking that their Australian descendants should hang their heads in shame, and have a 'Sorry Day'.

The hypocrisy and cherry-picking is pathological.







You are very right in a lot of ways, Herbert.
I do think though that although there was a sense of 'Don't mention the war', people certainly remembered it. My mother never really cared for Germans en masse (so she said) till her dying day, which was only 5 years ago. Mind you, she had some German  neighbours and friends but that was 'different'. Smiley
Nowadays no one-well most people-would not take it out on present day Germans because let's face it, most were not alive in the war or were very young and not responsible.

Yet it was a great and deliberate evil. My cousin's husband's parents lost most of their extended family in the holocaust. The survivors did mention it but not in the sense of hating all germans. Hating the evil.

It makes no sense to blame present day Australians for the british settlement either, or for the fact the world has changed so drastically in the last 200 plus years.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Why Nations Fail
Reply #85 - Mar 17th, 2014 at 6:39am
 
sherri wrote on Mar 17th, 2014 at 5:59am:
You are very right in a lot of ways, Herbert.


...

Oh, please ... you'll have me blushing.

sherri wrote on Mar 17th, 2014 at 5:59am:
My mother never really cared for Germans en masse (so she said) till her dying day, which was only 5 years ago. Mind you, she had some German  neighbours and friends but that was 'different'. Smiley


My condolences. I lost my brother and best friend 10 years ago, and it still hurts.

My mother taught English to German kids in Shanghai just before the war was declared, with a huge portrait of Hitler above the blackboard.

Hitler was like a pop-star. He was a celebrity who a lot of people admired for having pulled Germany out of the Depression and creating 'best standard' road systems like the autobahn. Even Churchill told the House of Commons that if Britain had a Hitler things would be greatly improved.

But then Adolf became belligerent and greedy, and it all went south after that.

sherri wrote on Mar 17th, 2014 at 5:59am:
Nowadays no one-well most people-would not take it out on present day Germans because let's face it, most were not alive in the war or were very young and not responsible.


The closest we have today that resembles Hitler's ideology, is Islam. It contains most of the elements of Hitler's Manifesto ~ including a genocidal hatred of the Jews, and the subjugation of Non-Believers to the status of Dhimmi, and of course, rule by dictatorship.

sherri wrote on Mar 17th, 2014 at 5:59am:
It makes no sense to blame present day Australians for the british settlement either, or for the fact the world has changed so drastically in the last 200 plus years.


Exactly.

You'll notice that 'Generational Guilt' is never applied to themselves, whether this be aborigines, or our immigrant finger-waggers. 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Why Nations Fail
Reply #86 - Mar 17th, 2014 at 6:41am
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Mar 17th, 2014 at 5:43am:
I'm not all gung-ho! about the British Empire as some would like to tar-and-feather me as being. Objecting to a Black Armband version of British history is not the same as being a one-eyed fanatic.

I've worked with nine .... let me repeat that: nine immigrant ethnicities whose countries had been militarily assisting Nazi Germany in wiping out democratic sovereign nations one after the other, and making slaves of those who were fit to work in armament factories and on the farms, and genocidally murdering the rest.

Nine. Working alongside me here in Australia.

I've talked to those who were railroaded to Hitler's factories. I've talked to those who survived Hitler's death camps.

No one mentions a word about these people and the evils their nations assisted with in such recent times.

But mention what the Brits did in shooting a few Abos who were persistently stealing sheep and cattle from settler farmers out in the bushlands where the living was precarious to say the least ~ and EVERYONE starts baying for blood and asking that their Australian descendants should hang their heads in shame, and have a 'Sorry Day'.

The hypocrisy and cherry-picking is pathological.

I'm assuming these nine ethnicities are not those who you "Tickle their tummy, and tell them they're just as good as those who they have had a chronic inferiority complex about (the English, et al). "?

I'm not surprised that collaborationist ethnicities don't mention the war.

But if you think that those nations who suffered under Germany have forgotten, I think you're very wrong. The hatred can run so deep in Europe (particularly for those who personally endured it) that mentioning the war can have unpredictable emotional reactions.

There are Jews alive in Australia and elsewhere who do remember the war and even the hearing the German language can make them feel not just emotionally upset but physically ill.

Another no-go in Europe is mentioning the Irish-English issue in the mixed company of British and Irish people. Interestingly, its the Irish in the group who do not appreciate the subject being brought up because they cannot predict their emotional response as the conversation delves into Irish grievances. They particularly do not like foreigners bringing up the subject. Some conflicts leave a cultural scar on the psyche.


Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Why Nations Fail
Reply #87 - Mar 17th, 2014 at 6:52am
 
sherri wrote on Mar 17th, 2014 at 5:59am:
I do think though that although there was a sense of 'Don't mention the war', people certainly remembered it. My mother never really cared for Germans en masse (so she said) till her dying day, which was only 5 years ago. Mind you, she had some German  neighbours and friends but that was 'different'.

It reminds me of watching Nancy Wake's speech... I think it was when she (ridiculously belatedly) was honoured by Australia when she was finally awarded the Order of Australia in 2004. She first made mention of her enduring hatred and disgust for all German people and (if I remember correctly) publically said she thought the only good German was a dead one. (The Germans had tortured and murdered her French husband during the war).
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Why Nations Fail
Reply #88 - Mar 17th, 2014 at 8:04am
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on Mar 17th, 2014 at 6:41am:
Another no-go in Europe is mentioning the Irish-English issue in the mixed company of British and Irish people. Interestingly, its the Irish in the group who do not appreciate the subject being brought up because they cannot predict their emotional response as the conversation delves into Irish grievances. They particularly do not like foreigners bringing up the subject. Some conflicts leave a cultural scar on the psyche.


Correct.

Not many Irish who hate the English are aware of the fact that Irish immigrants in New York, soon after 'The Famine', went on a 10-day rampage of genocidal butchery aimed at killing every black man they could find. They dragged the blacks out of their hiding places and slaughtered them in the streets.

Quote:
"... but ... but ... but it's only the ENGLISH who are the villains in the English/Irish narrative, isn't it?"


Throwing stones in glass-houses does have it's hazards.

I once had a Croatian thug giving me a hard time about the British Empire, and stealing Australia from the abos .. etc. He wasn't smiling. He genuinely was a nasty thug of a human being.

It never occurred to him that perhaps his own country also had a few questionable skeletons in the cupboard ~ such as an exterminatioin camp that even disgusted visiting German Nazis.

link 



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Why Nations Fail
Reply #89 - Mar 17th, 2014 at 8:12am
 

Much of the world’s growth is coming in English-speaking countries. Here, according to the Heritage Foundation, are the freest economies on earth in 2014:

Hong Kong
Singapore
Australia
Switzerland
New Zealand
Canada


Only in our present age would anyone think it impolite to point out what five of the six have in common.

What’s so special about the Anglosphere? Chiefly the common law. While other legal systems are deductive, in the sense that a law is written down in the abstract and then applied to particular cases, the common law builds up case by case, like coral. It concerns itself, not with theoretical principles, but with actual disputes. In consequence — and no one is really sure how this came about — it rises from the people rather than descending from the government, assuming residual rights and personal liberty. If something is not expressly prohibited, we expect to be able to do whatever we bloody well like. That attitude makes for a strong economy and a free society.

One man who knows this in his bones is Tony Abbott. He is the most flattering kind of Anglophile: one who sees us British as we are, ‘with all our crimes broad blown, as flush as May’, and yet likes us anyway. But he has given up using the word ‘Anglosphere’ since, whenever he does so, his opponents affect to see connotations of nostalgia, colonial cringe and even racism.
In fact, of course, the Anglosphere concept is about institutions, not ancestry.
It explains why Bermuda is not Haiti, why Hong Kong is not China, why Singapore is not Indonesia. Regular elections, uncensored newspapers, habeas corpus, sanctity of contract, individual freedom, open markets — these things are not the natural condition of an advanced state. They were evolved overwhelmingly in the language in which you are reading these words. When we call these precepts ‘Western’, we’re being polite: they became Western because of a series of military victories by the English-speaking peoples.
http://www.spectator.co.uk/australia/australia-diary/9153721/diary-656/
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 17
Send Topic Print