Winston Smith wrote on Mar 29^th, 2014 at 6:36pm:


It's our culture and the majority that decide who is the government. Which at a glance may make it look like we are doomed, because in both instances they're not exactly representational of intelligence. But the way out, and it's something that I use to maintain my theism, is that democracy allows for a minority party, by holding the balance of power, give to our intelligent side a significant amount of control. That is a party that held between 5 and 10% of the seats in the House of Reps can effectively give a new direction to a government. What I'm saying is that a new party representing effective intelligence can in theory be formed. And that's regardless of whether or not 'intelligence' represents a similar percentage as an effective value in society. That is because 'logic' being a force in itself can have a disproportionate effect. Confused? Well that's more to do with my lack of writing skills than it is to do with the simple logic involved.

Quote:


We can't really separate the laws of physics from most any effect, including societies current direction (the X factor for example), because we are after all physical beings. But if there is any potential metaphysical process (and force) it must be 'logic'. 

U.S. — The gender gap was once again proven to be real as a woman was only awarded 78% of the vote that a man got.

"There are gender gaps in pay, sports, and — now we know for certain — in politics," said Dr. Rip Scranton, a professor of gender studies and statistics at Harvard University. "What kind of sad world do we live in where a woman can only receive 78% of the votes that a man gets?"

Pundits offered a variety of explanations for the cold, hard reality of the gender gap. "It's probably because a female's vote is only worth 78% of a man's vote," said Lauren Bull, a lifelong resident of Seattle. "Plus, our donations to political parties are only worth 78% of a man's donations. This truly is the Handmaid's Tale."

Several news anchors pointed to the result as further evidence that Kamala Harris was a flawless candidate, weighed down only by her lack of a Y chromosome. "Clearly she was perfect, but if you can only receive 78% as many votes as a man, you'll never win. It's just math," said MSNBC's Rachel Maddow. "Ugh, men!"

At publishing time, experts warned the voting gender gap was a result of climate change.



End of.

After Trump's election victory on Tuesday, women on social media have expressed interest in following the "4 Nos" of the movement.

Quote:


Have a guess which one of the two groups will have plenty of love next 4 years and which won't?