|
Aussie
|
Grendel wrote on Mar 27 th, 2014 at 10:10pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27 th, 2014 at 10:00pm: Grendel wrote on Mar 27 th, 2014 at 9:49pm: Bam wrote on Mar 27 th, 2014 at 6:07pm: Grendel wrote on Mar 27 th, 2014 at 5:00pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Mar 27 th, 2014 at 4:10pm: Grendel wrote on Mar 27 th, 2014 at 3:20pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Mar 27 th, 2014 at 2:43pm: Normally the speaker is biased, we know this. But for one side to actually come out and say they are the MOST biased? hmmm, tells me that she must be pretty biased. Duchess Bishop must quit. No it tells you how biased and childish this bunch of ALP members are. Dreyfus has deserved the boot many times and not got it under a Labor speakership. Anna Burke was very biased and allowed the ALP to do whatever they pleased and continually fail to answer questions. She has no credibility or right to criticise anyone. Care to show us examples, oh dear conservative leftie? Or are you doing your usual finger at lips and shake routine? Perhaps you missed parliament on tv under Burke. So why are you here debating stuff you are ignorant of. I saw it I know how biased she was even Jenkins was biased but you didn't see the Coalition arc up the way these prats do. That's not true. yes it is... In the last parliament, the Coalition moved to suspend standing orders in almost every sitting week of the last parliament, far more than is usual. You tell me that every occasion was justified. I already made my point you seem to be avoiding the main one on purpose. In the last Parliament, The Coalition denied pairs for stupid reasons - the first time any Federal Opposition did that since before the last time that the United Australia Party was in office. You tell me that every denial of a pair was justified. During this parliament, this crap Speaker has denied points of order before they have even been made and indulged in numerous other examples of bias. Calling "Madam Speaker" is grounds for ejection! Really! You tell me that every ejection from Parliament was justified and every denial of points of order was justified. Did I say she was a great Speaker? No... Did I say she was a good speaker? No. your point would be then????? So far, Anna Burke was the most blatantly biased Speaker I've ever seen... Bishop has a way to go to match her yet. Rudd, Gillard, Rudd.....they are gone Grendel as is Burke. If it gets you over a speed bump......I'll say out loud....."I thought Burke was pathetic as a Speaker." Good. Fast forward to the present. I reckon Big Jobs is corrupt as a Speaker. She has taken "pathetic, incompetence, partisanship, bias and vengeance" to a completely new corrupt level. Do you agree, Elde Fruit? Yes or no. Choose your one word response, please. You would like 1 word... easy for you to understand and misinterpret, yet not at all satisfactory as an answer. I already made several comments about Bishop I suggest instead of jumping in like a mindless pedant you actually read stuff.  Yeas, I'd like one word, either a yes or a no. You can't bring yourself to do it, can you? "If you don't know the meaning of it ~ look it up."
|
Forum
Pages: 
