Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 
Send Topic Print
Labor's petulance on display (Read 8640 times)
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: Labor's petulance on display
Reply #135 - Mar 28th, 2014 at 12:39pm
 
St George of the Garden wrote on Mar 28th, 2014 at 11:32am:
99:0

The bitch is biased as well as senile.

I think the scoreline for previous Oppositions was just as lopsided, on both sides of politics.
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Labor's petulance on display
Reply #136 - Mar 28th, 2014 at 12:51pm
 
Bam wrote on Mar 28th, 2014 at 11:46am:
Grendel wrote on Mar 28th, 2014 at 11:28am:
Lying and creating strawmen now eh bam...  how disappointing you've become in your desperation.

Quote:
You show me one example - just one will do - where Speaker Burke named a member for addressing her as "Madam Speaker".

I never said she did now did I...

Quote:
Or even one example where Speaker Burke asked someone to leave the chamber for addressing her as "Madam Speaker".

Ditto above and since when did she asked to be addressed as such?

Quote:
Then your view that Burke was at least as biased as Bishop would have some weight.

Oh it does and so far she is worse than Bishop her record clearly shows her tossing coalition members out willy nilly and allowing the government to push propaganda ridicule and not answer questions.
Now if that is happening when the boot is on the other foot it is hardly fair to cry foul now is it.  For the ALP, the Greens YOU or biased rusted-on supporters.

As expected, you refused to discuss the matter in good faith. Not surprising considering you can't back up what you say with the slightest shred of proof.

Discussing this with you is like trying to hunt down a cockroach.

I'm not the one lying and creating strawmen...  you need to take a good look at yourself...  now its name calling too eh.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Labor's petulance on display
Reply #137 - Mar 28th, 2014 at 12:54pm
 
Bam wrote on Mar 28th, 2014 at 11:59am:
Grendel wrote on Mar 28th, 2014 at 11:18am:
Bam wrote on Mar 28th, 2014 at 9:37am:
Grendel wrote on Mar 27th, 2014 at 9:42pm:
Kat wrote on Mar 27th, 2014 at 5:20pm:
mozzaok wrote on Mar 27th, 2014 at 4:35pm:
I have seen Bronwyn Bishop as speaker a few times, and I have to admit I was surprised at how blatantly she displayed her bias.
She does not even pretend to be fair or even handed, which does seem to give legitimacy to Labor putting forward the motion they did, and in the words they chose to do so.
I know people disparage Slipper for his previous transgressions, but you could see he really did try to fulfill the role of speaker as fairly, and honorably as he could, and I think it must be a long time since we have had such a cavalier disdain for the honour needed in the role of speaker, as displayed by Bishop.



Good post. Agreed.

Do you both agree that Anna Burke was blatantly biased too?
If not...  you're both biased and have no credibility

If Burke was so blatantly biased, why didn't Abbott move a motion of no confidence in her?
More adult and less intolerant. 

Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

Abbott is about as adult as a two-year-old who's been denied treats in a supermarket.

Quote:
Quote:
With the tight numbers of the 43rd parliament, it would have had a chance of succeeding if she was too biased.
Bulldust the 3 musketeers and the green saw labor safely by on every vote.


Do you know why Slipper resigned as Speaker? He had lost the confidence of the House; Oakeshott and Windsor saw him privately to tell him that they would support a no confidence motion against him if one were moved, so he resigned. Pledging support on confidence in the Government is not the same thing as providing confidence in the Government's choice of Speaker. 
Puhlease your point would be?  They replaced him as speaker...
Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Slipper resigned because he did not have the numbers. That refutes your silliness about the three musketeers.

Good grief...  your personal and political bias do not make a credible argument.
I guess  you don't know who the 3 musketeers were then eh...  You mentioned 2 of them I merely added to your point.  To try and argue that Windsor and Dopeshott would ever support Abbott and the Coalition  is beyond ridiculous they spoke to Slipper to shore up Labor and their positions.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38802
Gender: male
Re: Labor's petulance on display
Reply #138 - Mar 28th, 2014 at 1:05pm
 
I'd love to know what this discussion is about but all the red insertions and the quoting of the quoting quoting renders it unintelligible.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Labor's petulance on display
Reply #139 - Mar 28th, 2014 at 1:06pm
 
Bam wrote on Mar 28th, 2014 at 12:26pm:
Grendel wrote on Mar 28th, 2014 at 11:28am:
Lying and creating strawmen now eh bam...  how disappointing you've become in your desperation.

Quote:
You show me one example - just one will do - where Speaker Burke named a member for addressing her as "Madam Speaker".

I never said she did now did I...

Burke NEVER threw anyone out of Parliament for daring to address her so far as I know. Bishop did.
Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Do stop... address what I said don't create strawmen.


If Burke actually did this, I'll stand corrected if you cite the Hansard with date and time.

Been over it shot your strawman to pieces...  you cant debate someone if you don't address what they actually say
.

And we can check bias quantitatively. Check the points of order in QT regarding relevance, and see how often these have been upheld and how many have been declined. There may be other statistics as well, such as how often the Speaker asks the Minister for clarification before making a ruling. 
Look I watched parliament nearly every day...  Burke was plainly biased and never made the ALP answer questions...  she may have occasionally directed them to but they never did....  not when I was watching.


This is another example where you cannot back up your silly argument with any evidence. 
Not my fault you are either biased, dishonest or never watched parliament.


Quote:
Quote:
Or even one example where Speaker Burke asked someone to leave the chamber for addressing her as "Madam Speaker".

Ditto above and since when did she asked to be addressed as such?

The exact form of address is not important. When did Burke throw anyone out for addressing her using her preferred title?
Not my point....  never made it did I...  you keep wanting to argue with a strawman.


Quote:
Quote:
Then your view that Burke was at least as biased as Bishop would have some weight.

Oh it does and so far she is worse than Bishop her record clearly shows her tossing coalition members out willy nilly and allowing the government to push propaganda ridicule and not answer questions.

And Bishop forces the Government to answer every question and disallows propaganda?

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

You crap on endlessly about her record but you refuse to provide any proof to back this up. You also persisit in this distraction tactic to deflect scrutiny from Bishop, who is the worst Speaker I have ever seen. And that includes the Victorian Coalition Speaker who shut down Parliament for two weeks last November rather than face a motion of no confidence. 
She may well get worse or not Improve...  but it'll take a very bad performance to outdo the bias of burke.


Quote:
Now if that is happening when the boot is on the other foot it is hardly fair to cry foul now is it.

Bishop named and ejected an Opposition member for addressing her.
A point you refuse to discuss.
Don't need to, I don't judge a speaker on one action alone.  BTW Dreyfus probably deserved it he should have been booted many times by Burke and wasn't and he has a penchant for not answering questions when they were in government.


Quote:
For the ALP, the Greens YOU or biased rusted-on supporters.

I'm not rusted on to any party, and will call issues as I see them. There's not a political party that I haven't criticised at some point. 
really?
Grin Grin Grin 
just make stupid childish comments about the PM instead eh?
  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

When will you own up to being a rusted-on one-eyed Coalition supporter?  I
'm not, so why should I.  If you people stop lying and carrying on like demented fools with your LW prog bias I won't have to correct you.  I have proved often enough I am not RW, but I refuse to lie and denigrate someone due to political bias.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 
Send Topic Print