John Smith wrote on Apr 2
nd, 2014 at 8:35am:
There have been many finding of Roman records over the centuries, including many at about the time Jesus lived. And yet, to my knowledge, (I think if they had the church would have made sure everyone was aware of it) none ever mentioned Jesus and all his miracles ... but as I said earlier, they did find a record of a man called Jesus who was crucified on the cross ... no mention of any resurrection or anything else though ... Unusual don't you think considering the Romans were very good record keepers????
.
There are hardly any surviving records from the time of Jesus. What survives in the way of records practically all comes from other times. And, in nay case, the Romans would have seen Jesus as a troublemaker from a relatively unimportant part of the country. Why would they want or need to document His existence? There would have been hundreds of Jews crucified by the Romans in the first three decades of the first century - and how many of them are documented?
So there are no reports by Pontius Pilate of Jesus' crucifixion. There are no surviving reports from Pilate at all.
In his essay, “Surviving Literature from the First Century” Professor E M Blaiklock (chair of Classics at Auckland University from 1947 to 1968) showed that there were hardly any primary documents from the period that covers the life of Christ - in fact there is no surviving Roman archival document that even mentions the existence of Pontius Pilate.
Stop making things up. Your ignorance is showing.