NorthOfNorth wrote on Apr 15
th, 2014 at 8:45am:
aquascoot wrote on Apr 15
th, 2014 at 8:38am:
Fred was a very very highly developed and passionate man. He was probably the exception, not the rule.
For simple folk in many countries, for the poor in Africa , belief in religion , is, I believe, a positive thing and if we are hell bent on tearing it away, where is the benefit.
the aborigines , a simple people, were often on church missions and singing and happy and etc etc.
I heard this morning that 16 young people in remote communities have commited suicide in the last 4 months.
How much better was their life under Christian tutelage, than under public service tutelage.
how much happier are the American negro community with their big gospel choirs and uplifting Christian churches, then the American negroes whacked out on crack cocaine or rotting in jail.
Christianity serves a useful purpose NoN.
Not everyone is mentally equipped to be a fred hollows.
Gee, you're in dark waters now, Crocodile Dundee!
The poor in Africa?
In the Lord's Resistance Army? Christian and Muslim Africans hacking each other to death?
NorthOfNorth,
To suggest, or to insinuate, that
The Lord's Resistance Army, could be called 'Christians', or that
The Lord's Resistance Army are following are promoting Christian principles in the world, is a little dishonest, imo.
NorthOfNorth wrote on Apr 15
th, 2014 at 8:45am:
For most of the last 2000 years, Christianity served its most useful purpose to Popes and Kings.
Is that so ?
And what did Jesus say,
directly, about such 'political' structures of men ?
Matthew 20:25
But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Ye know that
the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them.
26
But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister;
27 And whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant:
So where is 'holiness', if holiness is
not in men, and the religions of men ?
Numbers 16:5
...the LORD will shew who are his, and who is holy;...even him whom he hath chosen will he cause to come near unto him.
Choose the spirit,
choose life,
John 8:34
Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin.
35 And the servant abideth not in the house for ever: but the Son abideth ever.
John 14:15
If ye love me, keep my commandments.
Malachi 3:14
Ye have said, It is vain to serve God: and what profit is it that we have kept his ordinance, and that we have walked mournfully before the LORD of hosts?
15 And now we call the proud happy; yea, they that work wickedness are set up; yea, they that tempt God are even delivered.
16 Then they that feared the LORD spake often one to another:
and the LORD hearkened, and heard it, and a book of remembrance was written before him for them that feared the LORD, and that thought upon his name.
17 And they shall be mine, saith the LORD of hosts, in that day when I make up my jewels; and I will spare them, as a man spareth his own son that serveth him.
18 Then shall ye return, and discern between the righteous and the wicked, between him that serveth God and him that serveth him not.i
In an earlier post, #554, you stated,
Quote:Even a few of the popes were on record as not believing in god.
So what !
Because, in what sense were 'such' men [who came to that high religious office], pious men ?
Does becoming 'the' Pope [of the Catholic church], imbue a man with piousness ?
Clearly not, it would seem.
And i do not imagine that you would suggest such a thing.
But why does such a
political structure exist in the Catholic church ???????????
You said it [answer that question].....
Quote:For most of the last 2000 years, Christianity served its most useful purpose to Popes and Kings.
It is clear that Christianity [and many religions] are being, and have been usurped,
by groups carnal men.
But that men have done that [the usurping], do the actions of those carnal men invalidate the principles of truth and justice that Judaism and Christianity are based upon ?