polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 6^th, 2014 at 8:24pm:


Taqqiya IS a Muslim doctrine.  As is the infallibility of the Koran.  And your 'fight' against the doctrinally justified vilification and demoniasation of non-Muslims  is commendable but evidently without any effect. You are weak horse of Islam and are just as afraid of the strong horses (violent jihadis) as non-Muslims are.

That you may - may - be the majority shows just how utterly ineffective you are. I think the majority are the opportunists - as in every religion - who will sniff the wind and trim their sails accordingly.  Which means you are not having a significant following because if you did you would have gotten rid of the monstrous head-hackers by now.

This is why people are suspicious of your pronouncements - you are evidently not speaking for Islam because if you did, the head-hackers wouldn't be setting the agenda for Islam.
You would.  But you aren't. You are cowering like the rest of us. You hold forth among infidels here - here where you are safe.

Soren wrote on Apr 6^th, 2014 at 9:17pm:


Cowerering, are we? Where did you say you lived, dear boy?

South Sudan, was it?

Better get yourself an armoured Mercedes. Everyone who’s anyone has one, old chap.

freediver wrote on Apr 6^th, 2014 at 9:04pm:


That demonization and vilification of non-muslims happens in parts of the muslim world?

You are mistaken my friend.

You really should spend more time understanding what I actually say FD.

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 6^th, 2014 at 9:46pm:



gandalf,

The demonization and vilification of non-muslims happens, here on this very OzPol forum too, my friend!


e.g.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1396356294/97#97
Quote:

Karnal wrote on Apr 6^th, 2014 at 9:51pm:






Feelings, nothing more than feelings..

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 6^th, 2014 at 10:00pm:



gandalf,

FD does not gag YOUR opinions [nor delete any of your posts], because FD is [comfortable, and] happy for you [and everyone] to express their opinions and points of view.


gandalf,

Go to any moslem run forum.

They gag, and delete opinions they do not agree with.




gandalf,

The difference between Freediver, and yourself,
.....is that Freediver is NOT a moslem.

But you are.





Dictionary;
Muslim = = a follower of Islam.



What is ISLAM ???

And what violence against 'disbelievers' does ISLAM sanction require, form the part of a true moslem ?

ISLAMIC law....

"Ibn 'Abbas reported that the Prophet said: "The bare essence of Islam and the basics of the religion are three [acts], upon which Islam has been established. Whoever leaves one of them becomes an unbeliever and his blood may legally be spilled. [The acts are:] Testifying that there is no God except Allah, the obligatory prayers, and the fast of Ramadan."...."
fiqhussunnah/#3.110

n.b.
"Whoever......becomes an unbeliever.....his blood may legally be spilled."





FROM THE SUNNA OF MOHAMMED


hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #004.052.260

0ktema wrote on Apr 5^th, 2014 at 11:50pm:


It isn't me that set it up, but the one great God Yahweh through His 1600 year record to mankind, whose people have followed Him through two covenants over 3500 years.
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/muhammad_islam_in_bible_prophecy.htm#the_con...

2Ti 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

Regarding your peculiar suggestion of a "literal interpretation there of", the very post you are replying to discussed Revelation chapter 13, and a 7-headed, 10-horned "beast", that I understand to be a kingdom - not a 7-headed, 10-horned beast. The post also specifically discussed my NOT taking the figurative language of prophetic dreams and visions literally.
So how did your reading and comprehension skills cause to come up with your opposite suggestion?

0ktema wrote on Apr 5^th, 2014 at 11:50pm:


Whether you intended it or not you are saying you overcame the Gospel.

John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

Regarding "exclusivity", had you been, and remained, ignorant to the gospel, you may not have been held accountable:

Rom 4:15 Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression.

But if you had understood the Gospel, and then rejected it, that is a different matter:

2Pe 2:21 For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them. 22 But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.

Did you even understand the nature of your claim? We all generally credit 9 year olds with possessing great wisdom don't we? How many years prior to your turning 9 did you spend in Bible study, apologetics, study of Biblical prophecy and archaeology and such?

What was it that caused you to desire to "overcome" Christianity? Was it fulfilled Bible prophecy that too clearly demonstrates the veracity of the Gospel record?

Luke 24:44 And he said unto them, These [are] the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and [in] the prophets, and [in] the psalms, concerning me. 45 Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures, 46 And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: 47 And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. 48 And ye are witnesses of these things.

So what is one prophecy that was "written in the Psalms" that Jesus was making reference to?

Psalms 22:16 For dogs have compassed me: the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me: they pierced my hands and my feet. 17 I may tell all my bones: they look [and] stare upon me. 18 They part my garments among them, and cast lots upon my vesture.
http://www.islamandthetruth.com/the_lamb_slain.htm

That passage was penned before crucifixion had even been invented. The details are confirmed as fulfilled by the New Testament witnesses.

Matthew 27:35 And they crucified him, and parted his garments, casting lots: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, They parted my garments among them, and upon my vesture did they cast lots.
Mark 15:24 And when they had crucified him, they parted his garments, casting lots upon them, what every man should take.
Luke 23:33 And when they were come to the place, which is called Calvary, there they crucified him, and the malefactors, one on the right hand, and the other on the left. 34 Then said Jesus, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do. And they parted his raiment, and cast lots.
John 19:23 Then the soldiers, when they had crucified Jesus, took his garments, and made four parts, to every soldier a part; and also [his] coat: now the coat was without seam, woven from the top throughout. 24 They said therefore among themselves, Let us not rend it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be: that the scripture might be fulfilled, which saith, They parted my raiment among them, and for my vesture they did cast lots. These things therefore the soldiers did.
http://www.islamandthetruth.com/the_lamb_slain.htm