Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 3
rd, 2014 at 5:33pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 3
rd, 2014 at 3:46pm:
Aussie wrote on Apr 3
rd, 2014 at 3:22pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 3
rd, 2014 at 1:08pm:
A new low for AP. Who knew that he could actually go this low?
He went through the article, and changed every reference to 'asylum seekers' to 'illegal immigrants'.
What sort of person does such a thing? Seriously?
His "argument" is so weak, that he has to resort to this sort of childish, fraudulent behaviour.
Asylum seekers are not illegal immigrants (they are two completely different things), yet not only does this clown not have the intelligence to understand such a simple fact, he also decides to alter a public news story to serve his own evil purpose.
I'm sure the newspaper involved would love to hear about the frudulent practices of our demented AP.
I had to go check, as the claim is incredible....but yes ~ you are totally correct.
There should be some Rule and serious sanction for that sort of dishonesty.
Hard to believe that someone would stoop that low.
He had no argument to begin with and then, he went and added insult to injury by changing the words of the Daily Telegraph's Political Editor - Simon Benson.
All of AP's post must now be treated with extreme scepticism, even if he provides a credible link.
The "man" has proven himself to be a fraudster.
Hard to believe idiots like you can defend the policy of the previous Labor government on this issue. Heh, it's hilarious. From no boats to more than 750 in less than 6 years... along with at least 1,500 dead all on Labor's watch while they let 60,000+ country shopping illegal immigrants arrive. Appalling. Simply appalling.
You've got the wrong person, fraudster.
I've never defended the "policy of the previous Labor government on this issue."
Both Liberal
and Labor have acted appalingly when it comes to asylum seekers. They should all hang their heads in shame: Rudd, Gillard,
and Abbott.
Nice little diversion tactic though.
Now, back to your fraudulent actions: why do you think it's acceptable to change the text from a newspaper item.
Asylum seekers and illegal immigrants are two completely different things.
The article you quoted never mentioned illegal immigrants, yet you changed every mention of 'asylum seekers' to 'illegal immigrants'?
Why?