Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print
Again voicing the concerns of the Silent Majority (Read 11754 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49224
At my desk.
Re: Again voicing the concerns of the Silent Majority
Reply #60 - Apr 22nd, 2014 at 9:56pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 22nd, 2014 at 9:53pm:
Do you think my religion "compels" me to hate jews because of that hadith FD?

I'm so glad I have FD here telling me what are and what are not my own personal beliefs.


Let's start with what you think of it, before we get into what I think about what you think about what I think about it.

Is it anti-semitic?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Again voicing the concerns of the Silent Majority
Reply #61 - Apr 22nd, 2014 at 10:07pm
 
Or a better question - is it authentic?
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49224
At my desk.
Re: Again voicing the concerns of the Silent Majority
Reply #62 - Apr 22nd, 2014 at 10:10pm
 
Do you think it is a fake?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Again voicing the concerns of the Silent Majority
Reply #63 - Apr 22nd, 2014 at 10:21pm
 
I don't know.

What I do know though is that my religion does not compel me to be anti-semitic.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 96187
Gender: male
Re: Again voicing the concerns of the Silent Majority
Reply #64 - Apr 23rd, 2014 at 1:07am
 
Answer the question!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49224
At my desk.
Re: Again voicing the concerns of the Silent Majority
Reply #65 - Apr 23rd, 2014 at 6:44pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 22nd, 2014 at 10:21pm:
I don't know.

What I do know though is that my religion does not compel me to be anti-semitic.


If you don't know whether these statements are part of your religion, how can you be so sure about Islam's anti-semitism?

Is this going to be like the time you insisted that Muhammed did not have sex with his own sex slaves?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Again voicing the concerns of the Silent Majority
Reply #66 - Apr 23rd, 2014 at 7:31pm
 
freediver wrote on Apr 23rd, 2014 at 6:44pm:
If you don't know whether these statements are part of your religion


Thats right FD. Ahadeeth are probably the subject of the most debate within islam. Apart from a very small "core" of ahadeeth that are universally agreed to be authentic, everything else is disputed. This hadeeth falls into the latter category.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49224
At my desk.
Re: Again voicing the concerns of the Silent Majority
Reply #67 - Apr 23rd, 2014 at 7:36pm
 
Sounds convenient. Even wishy washy.

Is it common to get so many of the early Muslims reporting the same thing?

http://www.searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=41&translator=2&number=6980

6980

      Thaur b. Zaid has narrated this hadith with the same chain of transmitters. 

6981

      Ibn 'Umar reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: You will fight against the Jews and you will kill them until even a stone would say: Come here, Muslim, there is a Jew (hiding himself behind me) ; kill him. 

6982

      Ubaidullah has reported this hadith with this chain of transmitters (and the Words are):" There is a Jew behind me." 

6983

      Abdullah b. 'Umar reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: You and the Jews would fight against one another until a stone would say: Muslim, here is a Jew behind me; come and kill him. 

6984

      Abdullah b. 'Umar reported that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: The Jews will fight against you and you will gain victory over them until the stone would say: Muslim, here is a Jew behind me; kill him. 

6985

      Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews. 

6986

      Jabir b. Samura reported: I heard Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: Before the Last Hour there would be many liars, and there is an addition in the badith transmitted on the authority of Abu Ahwas of these words:" I said to him: Did you hear it from Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him)? He said: Yes." 
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Adamant
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1892
Brisbane
Re: Again voicing the concerns of the Silent Majority
Reply #68 - Apr 24th, 2014 at 8:08pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 7th, 2014 at 8:18am:
Pickering    Grin


Greg with his Pecker Grin Grin Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked
Back to top
 

In real life Gandalf is known as Mr 10%
 
IP Logged
 
austranger
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Opinionated Sod

Posts: 1506
adelaide
Gender: male
Re: Again voicing the concerns of the Silent Majority
Reply #69 - Apr 24th, 2014 at 9:23pm
 
I don't lay claim to any great knowledge or wisdom on Islam so I'd like to ask a question, or two.
Wahhabi.
I have heard that under an arrangement with the House of Saud the clerics of this sect in Saudi Arabia are given a significant percentage of the oil revenue, is this true?
As a part of that information is the claim that they use this money to found and support Islamic schools, madrashas(?), across the world, preaching their extreme form of Islam, is that true?
If these things are true then it would seem we have them to thank for the extremism and terrorism we are seeing world-wide, is that a reasonable conclusion?
I ask because I DON'T know, but would like to.
An apparently logical follow-on from these things, if true, would be that the West needs to confront these problems at source, Saudi Arabia, and yet no-one even seems to be talking about that?
Back to top
 

Any day with a smile in it is a good day
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Again voicing the concerns of the Silent Majority
Reply #70 - Apr 24th, 2014 at 10:36pm
 
austranger wrote on Apr 24th, 2014 at 9:23pm:
I don't lay claim to any great knowledge or wisdom on Islam so I'd like to ask a question, or two.
Wahhabi.
I have heard that under an arrangement with the House of Saud the clerics of this sect in Saudi Arabia are given a significant percentage of the oil revenue, is this true?
As a part of that information is the claim that they use this money to found and support Islamic schools, madrashas(?), across the world, preaching their extreme form of Islam, is that true?
If these things are true then it would seem we have them to thank for the extremism and terrorism we are seeing world-wide, is that a reasonable conclusion?
I ask because I DON'T know, but would like to.
An apparently logical follow-on from these things, if true, would be that the West needs to confront these problems at source, Saudi Arabia, and yet no-one even seems to be talking about that?


Hi austranger - and thanks for the questions which are extremely pertinent.

In my opinion - yes much of the world's islamic terrorism stems from wahabist ideology that comes from Saudi Arabia. Most alarmingly in recent years has been the very deliberate exporting of terrorists by House Saud into Syria - done as part of a proxy war against Iran. These terrorists have now spread into Iraq, where they currently control large swathes of the sunni north. We can only guess at the threat to the west these Saudi exports will be in coming years.

As to the crux of your point - yes absolutely, the west should be confronting this threat at its source - ie Saudi Arabia. Currently though, the US apologises for Saudi atrocities at every step of the way.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Again voicing the concerns of the Silent Majority
Reply #71 - Apr 24th, 2014 at 10:44pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 24th, 2014 at 10:36pm:
As to the crux of your point - yes absolutely, the west should be confronting this threat at its source - ie Saudi Arabia. Currently though, the US apologises for Saudi atrocities at every step of the way.



Why don't the 'vast majority of law-abiding, peaceful Muslims' confront it? Are they scared/opportunistic?
I think so.

Why is it up to the West to sort out Islam's internal mess?


If it's a problem, face it, confront it, fix it.

Don't make your cowardice/apathy/opportunism the West's problem.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
austranger
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Opinionated Sod

Posts: 1506
adelaide
Gender: male
Re: Again voicing the concerns of the Silent Majority
Reply #72 - Apr 24th, 2014 at 10:54pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 24th, 2014 at 10:36pm:
austranger wrote on Apr 24th, 2014 at 9:23pm:
I don't lay claim to any great knowledge or wisdom on Islam so I'd like to ask a question, or two.
Wahhabi.
I have heard that under an arrangement with the House of Saud the clerics of this sect in Saudi Arabia are given a significant percentage of the oil revenue, is this true?
As a part of that information is the claim that they use this money to found and support Islamic schools, madrashas(?), across the world, preaching their extreme form of Islam, is that true?
If these things are true then it would seem we have them to thank for the extremism and terrorism we are seeing world-wide, is that a reasonable conclusion?
I ask because I DON'T know, but would like to.
An apparently logical follow-on from these things, if true, would be that the West needs to confront these problems at source, Saudi Arabia, and yet no-one even seems to be talking about that?


Hi austranger - and thanks for the questions which are extremely pertinent.

In my opinion - yes much of the world's islamic terrorism stems from wahabist ideology that comes from Saudi Arabia. Most alarmingly in recent years has been the very deliberate exporting of terrorists by House Saud into Syria - done as part of a proxy war against Iran. These terrorists have now spread into Iraq, where they currently control large swathes of the sunni north. We can only guess at the threat to the west these Saudi exports will be in coming years.

As to the crux of your point - yes absolutely, the west should be confronting this threat at its source - ie Saudi Arabia. Currently though, the US apologises for Saudi atrocities at every step of the way.


It seems to me that it's also the case that the West's reaction of judging ALL Muslims(?) by the extremists activities has lead to a radicalisation of both the Sunni's and Shiítes as well, or perhaps their Imams are trying to compete with the Wahhabi's for the attention of Islamic Youth, or a bit of both perhaps?
Do you know how much effect this is having here in Oz, if any?
Also, I think an Imam in Iran(?) once called the USA the Great Whore, or words to that effect, and offhand I'd say that was a pretty fair description, especially considering their dealings with Saudi Arabia?
Back to top
 

Any day with a smile in it is a good day
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21842
A cat with a view
Re: Again voicing the concerns of the Silent Majority
Reply #73 - Apr 24th, 2014 at 11:05pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 24th, 2014 at 10:36pm:

As to the crux of your point - yes absolutely, the west should be confronting this threat at its source - ie Saudi Arabia.

Currently though, the US apologises for Saudi atrocities at every step of the way.




Yes, the Western 'hemisphere' should be seen to be interfering in Saudi Arabia internal politics,   ....because real moslems, you know, the moderate tolerant, peaceful, moslems, would all be soooooo, soooooo, grateful to us infidels.

NOT.





ISLAM [moslems] should be left to fester 'in its own juices', imo.

Any aid we [the Western 'hemisphere' nations] could provide to moslem political groups or regimes, can only draw us into conflicts which we DO want to avoid, and which we should be trying to avoid!

Getting our [non-ISLAMIC] culture involved, entangled, within the machinations of ISLAMIC global politics can only be destructive to our own interests - interests which have no alignment with the interests of corrupt localised ISLAMIC political ambitions.

ISLAM is a deeply corrupting influence upon all men who would seek to exploit its political methods and ambitions, imo.

Human beings should be running aways from ISLAM at 100 mph!!!




Seriously....

Quote:

A simple definition of SANITY/INSANITY.




Typically, an unrestrained sane person will act in ways which are harmless to others, and in ways which are creative, and productive [for himself, others, and society].

And typically, and conversely, an unrestrained INSANE person will act in ways which are harmful and destructive to himself, and, or, others around him.





Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
austranger
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Opinionated Sod

Posts: 1506
adelaide
Gender: male
Re: Again voicing the concerns of the Silent Majority
Reply #74 - Apr 24th, 2014 at 11:38pm
 
As I see it Islam today is going through something like the Christian churches went through in the Middle Ages and onwards, the Inquisition, Reformation etc etc.
It's just our bad luck that we're "living in interesting times", alla the old Chinese curse.
The "Global Village" brings that home to all of us instead of having somewhere to escape it's worst extremes though.
We can only hope they achieve some sort of stabilsation as a more peaceful religion sooner rather than later.
Back to top
 

Any day with a smile in it is a good day
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print