Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Koranic Law versus Sharia Law - 2 different Islams (Read 4576 times)
Bigmo
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8
Gender: male
Re: Koranic Law versus Sharia Law - 2 different Islams
Reply #15 - May 3rd, 2014 at 11:15pm
 
After 9-11 there has been various debates about Islam. Some have said that the terrorist are Islam's true spoken. The so called moderates practice taqiya. Taqiya is the deliberate lying for the faith. They say Islam is a violent religion that commands Muslims to kill non Muslim. Non Muslims have 3 choices, either they convert, pay the jizya(tax) or die. They say Muhammad was peaceful for PR reasons and once strong showed his true colors and preached violent jihad. They say all the peaceful verses were abrogated after his final victory with this verse:

9.5. But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity, then open the way for them: for God is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.

And also this verse:

9.29. Fight those who believe not in God nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by God and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

This verses are chosen for a reason. When read alone it implies a command to attack until they convert. Of course there are other verses in the Koran that talks about fighting. But why do they tend to focus on this one? Its simple, the other verses tend to show the defensive nature of the jihad and also the malicious intent and behavior of the pagans. Thus never cited. Lets look at some of them:

2.190. Fight in the cause of God those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for God loveth not transgressors

2.191. And slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have Turned you out; for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter; but fight them not at the Sacred Mosque, unless they (first) fight you there; but if they fight you, slay them. Such is the reward of those who suppress faith

2.193. And fight them on until there is no more Tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in God, but if they cease, Let there be no hostility except to those who practice oppression

Also:

2.217. They ask thee concerning fighting in the Prohibited Month. Say: "Fighting therein is a grave (offense); but graver is it in the sight of God to prevent access to the path of God, to deny Him, to prevent access to the Sacred Mosque, and drive out its members." Tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter. Nor will they cease fighting you until they turn you back from your faith if they can. And if any of you Turn back from their faith and die in unbelief, their works will bear no fruit in this life and in the Hereafter; they will be companions of the Fire and will abide therein.

All these verses talks about fighting, however within these verses the defensive nature of the verses and the malicious behavior of the pagans is cited. Thus those who wish to attack Islam never cite those verses. Its a deliberate attempt to hide what the Koran as saying and using selective verses to imply what they know the verses does not mean.

Lets however look at the verse that is often cited. This time we will take the verses before and after it to see what is the context this verse is talking.

9.4. (But the treaties are) not dissolved with those Pagans with whom ye have entered into alliance and who have not subsequently failed you in aught, nor aided any one against you. So fulfil your engagements with them to the end of their term: for God loveth the righteous.

9.5. But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity, then open the way for them: for God is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.

6. If one amongst the Pagans ask thee for asylum, grant it to him, so that he may hear the word of Allah. and then escort him to where he can be secure. That is because they are men without knowledge. 7. How can there be a league, before Allah and His Messenger, with the Pagans, except those with whom ye made a treaty near the sacred Mosque? As long as these stand true to you, stand ye true to them: for Allah doth love the righteous.


Also in the same chapter it explains the reason behind all of these battles fought

9.13. Will ye not fight people who violated their oaths, plotted to expel the Messenger, and took the aggressive by being the first (to assault) you? Do ye fear them? Nay, it is God Whom ye should more justly fear, if ye believe!


The verses clearly indicate that no forced conversion was there.There are standards that the Koran established for fighting.

As for such who do not fight you on account of faith, or drive you forth from your homelands, God does not forbid you to show them kindness and to deal with them with equity, for God loves those who act equitably. God only forbids you to turn in friendship towards such as fight against you because of faith and drive you forth from your homelands or aid in driving you forth . As for those from among you who turn towards them for alliance, it is they who are wrongdoers. 60:8-9

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bigmo
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8
Gender: male
Re: Koranic Law versus Sharia Law - 2 different Islams
Reply #16 - May 3rd, 2014 at 11:16pm
 
Permission (to fight) is given to those against whom war is being wrongfully waged, and verily, God has indeed the power to aid them. Those who have been driven from their homelands in defiance of right for no other reason than their saying, ‘Our Lord is God.’ 22:39-40

These verses show us clearly that the battles the believers fought was purely for defensive purposes as the believers were being persecuted because they believed in the teachings of the Quran. The pagans wanted the Quran to cease to exist and wanted the prophet and his followers to perish. This is why freedom of religion in the Quran is sacrosanct. The Koran more than any other literature guaranteed the absolute right for freedom of belief and expression and thought.


The Koran makes clear the job of the prophet:

16:82 But if they turn away from you, your only duty is a clear delivery of the Message .

6:107 Yet if God had so willed, they would not have ascribed Divinity to aught besides Him; hence, We have not made you their keeper, nor are you a guardian over them.

4:79-80 Say:'Whatever good betides you is from God and whatever evil betides you is from your own self and that We have sent you to mankind only as a messenger and all sufficing is God as witness. Whoso obeys the Messenger, he indeed obeys God. And for those who turn away, We have not sent you as a keeper."

11:28 He (Noah) said "O my people! think over it! If I act upon a clear direction from my Lord who has bestowed on me from Himself the Merciful talent of seeing the right way, a way which you cannot see for yourself, does it follow that we can force you to take the right path when you definitely decline to take it?°

17:53-54 And tell my servants that they should speak in a most kindly manner. Verily, Satan is always ready to stir up discord between men; for verily; Satan is mans foe .... Hence, We have not sent you with power to determine their Faith.

88:21 22; And so, exhort them your task is only to exhort; you cannot compel them to believe.

But most of all the Koran asks the prophet himself this question:

10.99-100. If it had been thy Lord's will, they would all have believed,- all who are on earth! wilt thou then compel mankind, against their will, to believe! No soul can believe, except by the will of God, and He will place doubt (or obscurity) on those who will not understand

Then again the Quran tells us:

109.1-6 Say : O ye that reject Faith,! I worship not that which ye worship, Nor will ye worship that which I worship, And I will not worship that which ye have been wont to worship, Nor will ye worship that which I worship, To you be your Way, and to me mine

There is nothing even called conquest in the Koran and there is nothing called paying taxes and offensive war and spreading faith by the sword are not Koranic whatsoever and is a direct disobedience to the orders of the Koran. Jizya in the Quran came when the believers were entering Mecca where they were forced into exile and left their homeland losing their livlihoods, homes and businesses. Jizya was never mentioned except upon the pagans of Mecca. Jizya was a war reparation and compensation for damages. The prophet was in Medina where many non believers lived under his domain but was never ordered to seek Jizya. Later Muslim authorities applied Jizya to anyone living under a Muslim ruler who are not Muslims as a form of tax. This is not the context it appears in the Quran.

So the Sunni/Shia concept that peaceful verses were abrogated by later verses that moved from defensive war to offensive has no backing from the Quran. This is because the permission allowed to fight has been outlined in the Quran. Only when provoked and forced should we fight. The prophet was a victim of religious coercion and persecution for religious propagation.

“The contemporary Islamic al-Azhar influential scholar, Muhammad Sa`id Ramadan al-Buti, says in his well-known research: “The verse (9:5) does not leave any room in the mind to conjecture about what is called defensive war. This verse asserts that holy war which is demanded in Islamic law is not a defensive war, because it could legitimately be an offensive war. That is the apex and most honorable of all Holy wars. Its goal is the exaltation of the word of Allah and the construction of Islamic society and the establishment of Allah’s kingdom on Earth regardless the means. It is legal to carry on an offensive Holy War.” ”

“Al-Suyuti does not see 2:256 abrogated by 9:73, but a case of delaying or postponing the command to fight the infidels until the Muslims become strong. When they were weak, they were commanded to endure and be patient. The first verse that was revealed in the Qur’an about fighting in Medina is Surah 2 verse 190, until Surah 9 was revealed, and it was cancelled by Surah 9 verse 5. ”

So we can see how the Islamic sects abrogated many the defensive war verses claiming verse 9.5 abrogated the defensive war only verses and changed it to offensive war. They believe in this due to the following hadith recorded in Bukhari's and Muslim's collections. Hadiths were compiled two centuries after the Quran was revealed.

Ibn ‘Umar related that the Messenger of Allah, upon whom be peace, said, “I have been ordered to kill the people until they testify that there is no god except Allah, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and they establish prayer and pay the zakah. If they do that, their blood and wealth are protected from me save by the rights
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bigmo
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8
Gender: male
Re: Koranic Law versus Sharia Law - 2 different Islams
Reply #17 - May 3rd, 2014 at 11:17pm
 
This hadith violates tens of Quranic commands about freedom and defensive war.


In the Quran we see the concept of religious persecution was a hallmark of pagan societies and oppressive tyrants.

They said: "O Shuayb! Much of what thou sayest we do not understand! In fact among us we see that thou hast no strength! Were it not for thy family, we should certainly have stoned thee! For thou hast among us no great position!" 11:91

(The father) replied: "Dost thou hate my gods, O Abraham? If thou forbear not, I will indeed stone thee : now get away from me for a good long while!" .19:46

The (people) said: "For us, We augur an evil omen from you: if ye desist not, we will certainly stone you , or a grievous punishment indeed will be inflicted on you by us." 36:18

They said: "If thou desist not, O Noah! thou shalt be stoned. 26.116

Pharaoh said, "Did you believe in him without my permission? This must be a conspiracy you schemed in the city, in order to take its people away. You will surely find out. "I will cut your hands and feet on alternate sides, then I will crucify you all." 7.123-124

All of these verses tell us how the prophets were persecuted for their religious propogation. The prophet of the Quran met the same fate. He was ordered to fight back and to complete the message of the Quran. But he was also ordered to limit his duty to preaching. If the people decide on him to judge between them than he is to do with justice.

Quran is peace   Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21399
A cat with a view
Re: Koranic Law versus Sharia Law - 2 different Islams
Reply #18 - May 3rd, 2014 at 11:29pm
 
Bigmo wrote on May 3rd, 2014 at 11:16pm:
.....
.....
These verses show us clearly that the battles the believers fought was purely for defensive purposes as the believers were being persecuted because they believed in the teachings of the Quran. The pagans wanted the Quran to cease to exist and wanted the prophet and his followers to perish. This is why freedom of religion in the Quran is sacrosanct. The Koran more than any other literature guaranteed the absolute right for freedom of belief and expression and thought.



Bigmo,

Thanks for that.

But somehow, the imam repeatedly has failed to tell it, in the Friday sermons.           Tongue

Non-moslem places of worship are routinely desecrated and destroyed by ignorant moslems.

I say 'ignorant' moslems, because they are always those moslems who did not get the missive, about freedom of religion being enshrined in the Koran.


Google;
muslims urinate, bibleiMORE.....



Hagia Sophia
, in Turkey, was built by Christians.

It is a Christian cathedral.

How many Christians are permitted [by Turkish authorities] to worship in Hagia Sophia ?



"Hagia Sophia.....is a former patriarchal basilica, later a mosque, now a museum in Istanbul, Turkey......It was the largest cathedral ever built in the world for nearly a thousand years....It was the patriarchal church of the Patriarch of Constantinople and the religious focal point of the Eastern Orthodox Church for nearly 1000 years.
In 1453, Constantinople was conquered by the Ottoman Turks and Sultan Mehmed II ordered the building to be converted into the Ayasofya Mosque."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hagia_Sophia


Iran: Seven historic synagogues in Tehran destroyed
Tehran, 15 April [2008] (AKI) - Seven ancient synagogues in the Iranian capital, Tehran, have been destroyed by local authorities.
The synagogues were in the Oudlajan suburb of Tehran, where many Iranian Jews used to live.
"These buildings, which were part of our cultural, artistic and architectural heritage were burnt to the ground," said Ahmad Mohit Tabatabaii, the director of the International Council of Museums’ (ICOM) office in Tehran.
"With the excuse of renovating this ancient quarter, they are erasing a part of our history," said Tabatabaii.
http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/Religion/?id=1.0.2075294012


16 May 2006
Pressure on multi-faith Malaysia
Malaysia is considering its multi-cultural credentials after a crowd of Muslims on Sunday broke up a meeting called to defend the rights of religious minorities.
...."I'm becoming an alien in Malaysia, in my own country," says Dr Jacob George.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4965580.stm


Destruction of Non-Muslim Worship Centers Riles Faith Minorities in Malaysia
By Sean Yoong for AP:
April 01, 2007
PUTRAJAYA, Malaysia - The cavernous pink Putra Mosque with its soaring minaret is one of the most commanding sights and popular tourist photo backdrops in the new city of Putrajaya.
A house of worship for thousands of Muslims in the 8-year-old administrative capital of Malaysia, it is a showcase of the nation's dominant faith  Islam.
But the mosque also highlights the fact that Putrajaya doesn't have a single church or temple  a fact that minority Buddhists, Hindus and Christians see as one example of the second-class treatment other faiths get in this Muslim-majority country.
http://christianpost.com/article/20070330/destruction-of-non-muslim-worship-centers-riles-faith-minorities-in-malaysia.htm


Church demolished in Muslim-run state [Malaysia]
June 19 2007
Kuala Lumpur - Authorities have demolished a church in a Muslim-ruled state in northeast Malaysia, sparking anger among the indigenous people who say they own the property....
http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=126&art_id=nw20070619141302153C420344


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Bigmo
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8
Gender: male
Re: Koranic Law versus Sharia Law - 2 different Islams
Reply #19 - May 3rd, 2014 at 11:55pm
 
Well Muslims are told this is Islam. The sects took over because they were the state religion during the Abbasid empire. The Abbasid ruled for almost 500 hundred years. So many Muslims today are not aware of how these sects emerged. But the internet is spreading a lot of knowledge. Also the violence we see is making many Muslims question what is going wrong.

Many of these hadiths were unknown in the past but because of the invent of printing press and mass media more and more Muslims have access to them. This somewhat explains the rise of violence and fundamentalism in the modern era. But it also exposes the sects like never before.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mattywisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1373
Gender: male
Re: Koranic Law versus Sharia Law - 2 different Islams
Reply #20 - May 4th, 2014 at 12:12am
 
Bigmo wrote on May 3rd, 2014 at 11:55pm:
Well Muslims are told this is Islam. The sects took over because they were the state religion during the Abbasid empire. The Abbasid ruled for almost 500 hundred years. So many Muslims today are not aware of how these sects emerged. But the internet is spreading a lot of knowledge. Also the violence we see is making many Muslims question what is going wrong.

Many of these hadiths were unknown in the past but because of the invent of printing press and mass media more and more Muslims have access to them. This somewhat explains the rise of violence and fundamentalism in the modern era. But it also exposes the sects like never before.


Actually it exposes what muslims have not been told about the origins of islam from paganism and also the origins of the rituals they follow from paganism.

It's one thing to be told how to think and another trying to stop them from thinking for themselves. Knowledge is power and islam realizes this. That is why it is so strict in control of people. mohammed needed total control for his regime.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48814
At my desk.
Re: Koranic Law versus Sharia Law - 2 different Islams
Reply #21 - May 4th, 2014 at 6:15pm
 
Quote:
In the Quran we see the concept of religious persecution was a hallmark of pagan societies and oppressive tyrants.


So how does that differ from Islam? Did Muhammed practice religious persecution in turning up at Medina and within a few years expelling all three big Jewish tribes? What about setting up a state with different legal systems for Muslims and non-Muslims, that put all non-Muslims in a position of inferiority? What about expelling all the pagans from Arabia?

Quote:
Also the violence we see is making many Muslims question what is going wrong.


So this violence didn't exist in Muhammed's time?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48814
At my desk.
Re: Koranic Law versus Sharia Law - 2 different Islams
Reply #22 - May 4th, 2014 at 7:37pm
 
Why do these things always seem to be targeted at non-Muslims? When it is Muslims talking to non-Muslims, it's all about how the Muslims are confused and Islam is not really about violence, and they are reforming it as we speak. But when it is Muslims talking to Muslims they are calling each other hypocrites for not being 'conservative' enough, or blowing up each others' mosques, or warily avoiding each other. We saw it here with Abu and Falah, and with Abu and Gandalf. They pretty much refused to talk each other, and Abu even accused me of divisiveness when I tried to talk about their differences. Gandalf spends all his time telling us we misunderstand Islam and it is really all peace and love. He once tried insisting he is having the same argument with Muslims, but when I asked him about it he went all silent. All the talk of reform within Islam is targeted at people who know very little about Islam. It is never targeted at actually reforming Islam.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Koranic Law versus Sharia Law - 2 different Islams
Reply #23 - May 5th, 2014 at 8:12am
 
Yadda wrote on May 3rd, 2014 at 11:29pm:
But somehow, the imam repeatedly has failed to tell it, in the Friday sermons.           Tongue


Yadda, just one question.

Have you ever been to a Friday Sermon? If not, how would you have any idea what is told on Friday sermons the world over?
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21399
A cat with a view
Re: Koranic Law versus Sharia Law - 2 different Islams
Reply #24 - May 5th, 2014 at 9:56am
 
Google;
Erdogan, The Mosques are our Barracks, the Domes our helmets, the Minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers


Erdogan = = 
Recep Tayyip Erdogan
, the moderate moslem Prime Minister of Turkey



Google;
muslim violence, after "friday prayers"


Google;
mosque frequently used as an armoury, militants



Quote:
.....The Mosque in any Muslim community is more than a place of worship. It is also a political and social centre where sermons and lectures against the infidel can be preached. Where responses to perceived slights by the infidel against the Muslim, as in the Cronulla riot of 2005, are also organized such as from the Lakemba Mosque, which has been readily identified as the staging point for the payback raids against the infidel over the following three nights after the riot. The Mosque is used as a platform for every fundamentalist Islamic group, such as Hiz ut-tahir, which is an Islamic sect and is proscribed in several countries as an Islamic terrorist organization, but still has free rein here. The group recently held ‘Muslim Uprising’ events in Sydney to proclaim the coming of the Islamic Caliphate. [3]

http://www.protectionist.net/2012/02/03/what-is-a-mosque/





gandalf,

In answer to your question;

No.


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Koranic Law versus Sharia Law - 2 different Islams
Reply #25 - May 5th, 2014 at 10:13am
 
Yadda wrote on May 5th, 2014 at 9:56am:
gandalf,

In answer to your question;

No.


Thank you.

Now kindly desist from assuming what is and what isn't talked about in these sermons.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21399
A cat with a view
Re: Koranic Law versus Sharia Law - 2 different Islams
Reply #26 - May 5th, 2014 at 10:26am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on May 5th, 2014 at 10:13am:
Yadda wrote on May 5th, 2014 at 9:56am:
gandalf,

In answer to your question;

No.


Thank you.

Now kindly desist from assuming what is and what isn't talked about in these sermons.





gandalf,

QUESTION;
What IS frequently talked about in sermons to the lay moslem, in mosques ?

ANSWER;
Inciting hatred of those who are not moslems.

Evidence ???




IN A MOSQUE, IN THE UK, #1,

"What makes Allah happy?
Allah is happy, when kafir get killed."
[/size]

Please watch this YT...
Muslims being deceptive Islam EX-Muslims
         goto 4m 30s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZx8cNSC9O0




IN A MOSQUE, IN THE UK, #2,

"The Undercover Mosque: The return"
[...from the UK]
"A group of Christians visiting the mosque and the preacher and the Women's Circle treat [the Christians] kindly and talk about,
'We're all people of the book and we all come from the same history'."



THE KICKER...
"Just as soon as that group of visitors [the Christians] leaves, the language changes completely. 'CHRISTIANITY IS VILE', the preacher says....."



Source;
ABC Radio National Religion interview transcript  - "The Undercover Mosque: The return"
".....Stephen Crittenden: .....your program highlights a certain kind of duplicity. When they're caught out, individuals don't miss a [beat], they just say they've been taken out of context....
David Henshaw: ......Regent's Park Mosque is officially committed to inter-faith dialogue....."
http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/religionreport/the-undercover-mosqu...


The term, "inter-faith dialogue" [as being used by moslems] = = code for
"don't frighten the horses"
[in the Christian churches].

'We moslems should continue to pretend that our stance towards Christians is;'
'We're all people of the book and we all come from the same history'."






WHAT THE KORAN COMMANDS;

"....take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends....
......he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them."

Koran 5.51


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48814
At my desk.
Re: Koranic Law versus Sharia Law - 2 different Islams
Reply #27 - May 5th, 2014 at 7:26pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on May 5th, 2014 at 10:13am:
Yadda wrote on May 5th, 2014 at 9:56am:
gandalf,

In answer to your question;

No.


Thank you.

Now kindly desist from assuming what is and what isn't talked about in these sermons.


Is the only way to find out to turn up?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Koranic Law versus Sharia Law - 2 different Islams
Reply #28 - May 5th, 2014 at 7:51pm
 
What do you think FD? Those stories of Yadda wouldn't have got out without someone "turning up" and recording it. How many uncontroversial, non-incriminating sermons do you think those undercover reporters sat through before they found the fun ones?

I guess you'll never have much idea unless you yourself starting "turning up" no?
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48814
At my desk.
Re: Koranic Law versus Sharia Law - 2 different Islams
Reply #29 - May 5th, 2014 at 8:45pm
 
I'd prefer to just read it in the paper. I get enough apologetic gibberish right here.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print