freediver wrote on May 7^th, 2014 at 10:01pm:


            Yet more selective picking, and expressions of bigoted opinion without substance, you only further prove my points about bigots, and you're welcome to the last word, it makes no difference to me.

freediver wrote on May 7^th, 2014 at 10:01pm:


Nearly all of the Arabian Peninsular came into the Islamic state peacefully. The early caliphates expanded in wars that were aimed at defending the Islamic Arab state, and liberating their neighbours who lived under despot dictatorships. Christians who acted in good-will towards Muslims were left in peace. This is why no Islamic army invaded Ethiopia, despite it only being a few kilometres from Arabia.

freediver wrote on May 7^th, 2014 at 10:01pm:


Rather, the Arabs had little interest in lands that were so cold.

Pyrenees in winter:


[/quote]

Re Yadda.

Quote:


You have missed point.  No matter how ugly your face may be, it would not cause demonstratable / material damage to others who saw your face.  They may feel surprised, bewildered or even shocked.  But, no one is going to lose sleep over it, or it making them so depressed that they suicide.   It is very different to say, people deliberately, and intentionally insult or humiliate you based on your looks. 

Quote:


Depends on what they do?  The law recognize that different level of offense have different levels of punishment.  If they just saying spontaneously that you are too ugly to be seen in public places.  Then, you can rightfully demand an apology.  However, if it just that, then you are wasting your money on a court case.  However, if they are saying this deliberately day after day after day.  So much so, that it is causing you to be depressed, despite the fact that you have attempted to mediate with them or avoiding these said people.  Or in circumstances where they attempt to affect your personal rights due to your looks.  In which case, then if you can demonstrate any material loss - e.g. doctor's bill, sick days at work - with proof - e.g. diary, psychologist support letter - then you may be able to sue and recover those damages. 

N.b. very sick over the last few days.

freediver wrote on May 8^th, 2014 at 9:14pm:




LOL

Moslem apologists/spokesmen are true masters of spin, aren't they!!!!         






A body representing British 'mainstream' moslems, The Muslim Council of Britain, has declared on its website;

Quote:


http://www.mcb.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2307:mcbnewst...
http://www.mcb.org.uk/article_detail.php?article=announcement-656










Honest!

Yadda wrote on May 8^th, 2014 at 9:43pm:


Yadda has previously exposed itself as a Hasbara shill and bugler for Israel.

Ask your handler for a more clever script!

freediver wrote on May 8^th, 2014 at 9:14pm:

Conquered? With which army did he arrive in Madina with? The historic fact of the matter is that the people of Madina invited him to be their leader. He arrived in Madina with no army, because he had no army at the time. How does a man with no army conquer a place?

freediver wrote on May 8^th, 2014 at 9:14pm:


True, but only after continual acts of violence and outrages committed by Jews in the face of years of Muslim tolerance. Muslim tolerance was finally rewarded by treachery when the Jewish inhabitants blatantly aided an invading enemy and attacked the Muslim women's garrison.


freediver wrote on May 8^th, 2014 at 9:14pm:

Except that it never happened. More Freediver falsehoods.


freediver wrote on May 8^th, 2014 at 9:14pm:

Actually, he demonstrated great mercy and forgave nearly all of his enemies even when he had gained the upper hand. Nearly all the pagans that were defeated in battle were let go free. His magnanimity is clearly displayed from his first Battle of Badr, after which, all pagan captives were released, to the last of his battles against pagans when the entire city of Mecca was forgiven and let go free despite years of hostility and aggression against Muslims.


freediver wrote on May 8^th, 2014 at 9:14pm:


Piracy originating in Spain against Africa necessitated this.

Why did Muslims never invade Ethiopia when it was only a few miles from Arabia?

freediver wrote on May 8^th, 2014 at 9:14pm:


Yes...if subjugation means, gaining peace and security, having to pay lower tax, becoming free from conscription, and having freedom of religion introduced to your land.

Quote:


Out of three powerful Jewish tribes, he expelled the first two, and slaughtered the third. That's how.

Quote:


That's right people. Muslims insist that Muhammed turned up with nothing and moved on to slaughtering entire tribes within Medina and waging war against Mecca, within a few years, all out of self defence, and the treacherous Jews were to blame for it all. They expect you to believe this crap.

Quote:


It happened and is well documented by Muslims. They are proud of the ethnic cleansing. The signs on the freeway as you drive into Medina - "Muslims only past this point" - are not an accident. They are the heart of Islam. That is Muslims showing you how they really feel. And it started with Muhammed.

Quote:


By slaughtering the men and riding off on the women?

Quote:


Were they free to stay in their own home? Or is this the Islamic version of freedom that you are peddling?

Quote:


Crap. This is just more Muslim victimhood peddling. Muslims can get away with anything. Muslims are never to blame. Their victims are always to blame. Always. Absolutely. ever ever.

Quote:


Is slaughtering every adult male peace and security? Is losing all your land and possessions and paying a 50% tax on all you produce a lower tax? Is being beheaded for insulting the prophet or changing your religion freedom of religion? We are speaking English here TC. Please don't use words like freedom when you mean the opposite.

Who said he arrived with an army? Like all good politicians, he talked his way in first. Then he started killing anyone who disagreed with him. Once he had an army he moved onto slaughtering entire tribes and villages.