cods wrote on Aug 9^th, 2014 at 10:49am:

Is this your opinion Cods or someone elses. Or did you just make it up in an attempt to defame?

[urlhttp://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1394183442/31][/url]


cods wrote on Aug 9^th, 2014 at 10:45am:








Sorry Walter...it seems this has become the current Daniel Morcombe Thread.  Here is some more of the Prosecutor's Address to the Jury:

Click here.

I reckon this bit highlights why there are the ancillary charges of lesser offences.  It is all about whether the Crown have proven an intent to kill, or the commission of an act likely to cause death or grievous bodily harm.

Quote:
Mr Byrne said, if the jury, could not find intent, then they should assess whether Mr Cowan could foresee Daniel's death as a consequence when he grabbed him around the neck to stop him escaping.

He said they could also convict on murder if they assessed an ordinary person who applied for the force around Daniel's neck with sufficient time for him to lose consciousness and die could have foreseen death as a real possibility.





Lots of questions........enough to establish reasonable doubt?

I reckon this will be the nub issue.  The guts of the Crown case is the 'confession' (clearly one made under an obvious inducement) and that the remains were found NEAR to where Cowan said they would be.

There is zero scientific evidence as to cause of death.  All we have is (a) the death and (b) what Cowan said about what happened, which went nowhere near establishing an intent to kill or to do an act likely to cause death or grievous bodily harm.



 

I guess having a dead body doesnt prove its dead.

cods wrote on Aug 9^th, 2014 at 11:15am:

so you lied. No one has made any such statement. How sad that you and Emma feel the need to fabricate statements and defame others in order to make an argument. Shows your personality type Cods. I wonder what you have hidden in your background.

Emma wrote on Aug 8^th, 2014 at 9:51pm:


If my understanding only relates to you being a  misandrist of the hairy armpit brigade then I'm not bothered about your interpretation of my knowledge of the words I use ..... if you want it in basic terms you're an obtuse feminazi tw/at.

Have a nice day.

How sad that you and Emma feel the need to fabricate statements and defame others in order to make an argument. Shows your personality type Cods.

huh what rubbish.. and Cods and I rarely see eye to eye..   

ian wrote on Aug 9^th, 2014 at 11:03am:


What are you referring to exactly.. Cods ? 
that I should be reasonable about..??

Pls explain.

ian wrote on Aug 9^th, 2014 at 11:35pm:




Care to elucidate on that IAN..???
Put it up or shut up... ..
so  who have I defamed and fabricated statements about ??

eh??  You said it  .. put it up...  I dare you to stand by your word.. and show me where I have done so, .....

and failure to provide said evidence of your claims  will show us proof of what a hollow man,  what a troll you are.

Come on... put it up. ! BIG MAN.

Emma wrote on Aug 9^th, 2014 at 11:32pm:



I was being sarcastic emma...dont take any notice of what some other ding a ling is trying to do.. pulllllllease...some will do and say anything for attention....I prefer to look the other way...and not give them their 5 min...