Amadd wrote on Jun 3
rd, 2014 at 12:57am:
I would question as to why somebody who was allegedly abused at 13 would then carry on a relationship after she turned 18.
I question why another "victim" would lie in saying that Rolf's actions had caused her weight loss problems in return for money from a magazine.
yes you can question all you like..
the major point in all this is was a crime?..
he put his hands inappropriately on children..
are you saying...that really isnt a big deal??..
it isnt a crime to have a relationship with a full grown man when a girl is 18
it isnt a crime to receive money to talk to someone about a health problem they claim was down to a man who was on their TV sets many times a year..
Amadd wrote on Jun 3
rd, 2014 at 12:57am:
Is this just the blind leading the blind? It seems that there's a iot of C$#nt in all of them, except only one has the talent to bring millions of smiles around the world
so making people smile is an excuse... thats what we have been trying to say...
his celebrity helped him get away with it for many years...
and so it should by the way I read your comments...
so if a flashy celeb wanted to put his hands all over a child in your family... you would turn a blind eye because of his stature in the community...
funny that..is that how you see the priests that are being called in the Royal into child abuse?