Rosie wrote on Jun 3^rd, 2014 at 5:58pm:


I was referring to adults.

And yes, believe it or not men know better than women.  Men have better judgment than women when it comes to people.

You women marry the sort of men that the rest of us men know will be hopeless as husbands. This country and the UK is stiff with the iconic 'Single Mothers' who didn't know sh!t from sherbet when it came to assessing a man to be a suitable husband and father.

Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 3^rd, 2014 at 2:30pm:

No its not Herbert, pedophilia is an attraction to pre pubescent children. It may be a hairy adult in bed with a young teenager, but its not pedophilia. Unwelcome groping of teenagers is also not peodophilia.

Black Orchid wrote on Jun 3^rd, 2014 at 6:12pm:


Is there any suggestion that it was when Harris was in Cambridge (as part of what was obviously a rolling circus where the cast were driven all over the UK by bus) that any alleged offence occurred?

If there is none.....what is the big deal about this.  Bloody hell.....years ago......I used to go to all sorts of places (and commit no sexual offence,) including a cricket tour of New Zealand where we were driven around by bus.  I wouldn't have a clue now what all those places actually were.  It was a cricket pitch and some "Sheffield Shield type" Team we played.  I could easily and honestly swear right now that I've never been to Hamilton......but there is probably some video/film somewhere which may prove I was once in fact there.  Wow, Aussie deliberately lied about a meaningless event.

Turn it up!

'When ever he goes through rain and snow

The people always let girls know, there's Rolfe the grope diddle diddle, diddle diddle oom

With his wandering hands diddle diddle, diddle diddle oom'

ian wrote on Jun 3^rd, 2014 at 6:17pm:




so what is it then???..


paedophile RINGS are mostly just that RINGS that go around the world... videos..showing all young children...all for the delight of men who are sitting in front of a computer..they pay highly for this material of course....

the children involved pay an even higher price .

but why are they called paedophiles...and someone who actually puts his hands on children without permission....is called

A>WHAT exactly?

cods wrote on Jun 3^rd, 2014 at 6:53pm:


Take a pill cods ya frothing at the mouth

ian wrote on Jun 3^rd, 2014 at 7:43pm:


Quite true - Once Upon A Time there lived a fourteen year old pricness, daughter of a mighty king, and one day, while he was musing over his never-ending wars with his rival king across the creek - he decided the best way was to consolidate a blood tie by marrying off his daughter to the son of the other king.

First he checked with the Royal maids-in-waiting (and in his bed at times) to be sure that she had cracked the womanhood code and had left marke of being ready for swiving on her creamy white sheets..... and yea, verily she were Woman Bled, and happily did the king consult with his neighbouring king and arranged they a wedding fit for royalty between the swain and the maid, and thus between the twain.... and of the two sheets of the marital bed, they had soon lain between those twain.... and proof given thereof by stain....

And the entire kingdom rejoiced in the new-fond womanhood of the princess on the day after her wedding and awaited with joy a new heir to both kingdoms now living in peace.....

And ye king bethought himself to the biblical times when it were meet for man and woman to be joined at age thirteen... and even north of ye border (not ye boarder) in Land of Scotia still there prevailed the practice of hand-fasting at such young age.... and he summoned his seer, Nostrildamus, who quoth that in time to come man and woman would not be so until reaching middle age of twenty and one, but that certain leeway would be made in the peasantry in order that their pleasantry be presently pleasured .. and indeed pleasurably... at age of fifteen summers or so..mayhap sixteen.

And ye king, fell and wrath, did banish Nostildamus to the wine cellar to drink off his befuddlement....

cods wrote on Jun 3^rd, 2014 at 9:50pm:


If they are 13 then it is not paedophilia. Just because someone doesn't approve of such behaviour does not make it something else. If a 50 year old man was to have sex with a 13 year old girl then a crime has been committed, but it is not paedophilia.

There is a huge difference between being sexual attracted to children, and someone being attracted to a young person who is post puberty. Our society has constructed an age limit that makes Adult to under 16/18 an issue, but this line has moved over the years and is not consistent across the western world.

It is beyond insanity to think that if a female is 17 years and 364 days old that she cant be attractive to a grown man, but within 24 hours she will suddenly become sexually attractive and that will be ok. All the curves are exactly the same 1 day before 18 compared to 1 day after 18, why the hell would she not be attractive to a grown man? (A "grown man" being anyone 18+).

Your use of the word paedophilia would make every single straight male in Australia guilty of being one. Every straight male has been attracted to a girl under 18 at sometime, even when they themselves may have been over the age of 18.