Quantum wrote on Jun 4
th, 2014 at 9:59am:
cods wrote on Jun 3
rd, 2014 at 9:50pm:
ian wrote on Jun 3
rd, 2014 at 7:43pm:
cods wrote on Jun 3
rd, 2014 at 6:53pm:
[
so what is it then???..
paedophile RINGS are mostly just that RINGS that go around the world... videos..showing all young children...all for the delight of men who are sitting in front of a computer..they pay highly for this material of course....
the children involved pay an even higher price .
but why are they called paedophiles...and someone who actually puts his hands on children without permission....is called
A>WHAT exactly?
Im not sure why this is hard to understand, pedophilia is the attraction to
pre pubescent children. even slightly retarded people should be able to grasp this simple concept, a teenager is not a pre pubescent child.
so what do you call someone who fiddles with a TEENAGER GIRL.... what name do you have for them??...you are claiming a 13 yr old is the same as a 19yr old arent you as they are all teens..
and you wouldnt mind a 20 yr old man taking out your 13 yr old daughter I gather???...
you would be quite trusting of him I am sure.
you wouldnt think for one moment he was a paedophile..
just someone who liked teenage girls.
If they are 13 then it is not paedophilia. Just because someone doesn't approve of such behaviour does not make it something else. If a 50 year old man was to have sex with a 13 year old girl then a crime has been committed, but it is not paedophilia.
There is a huge difference between being sexual attracted to children, and someone being attracted to a young person who is post puberty. Our society has constructed an age limit that makes Adult to under 16/18 an issue, but this line has moved over the years and is not consistent across the western world.
It is beyond insanity to think that if a female is 17 years and 364 days old that she cant be attractive to a grown man, but within 24 hours she will suddenly become sexually attractive and that will be ok. All the curves are exactly the same 1 day before 18 compared to 1 day after 18, why the hell would she not be attractive to a grown man? (A "grown man" being anyone 18+).
Your use of the word paedophilia would make every single straight male in Australia guilty of being one. Every straight male has been attracted to a girl under 18 at sometime, even when they themselves may have been over the age of 18.
I have an old saying quantum
AND THAT IS
LAWS ARE MADE BY MAN WITH MEN IN MIND...
say it slowly..
all laws are made by men...
men did not make the little children or the teenagers...
they just made laws and put certain words into gear
maybe you guys need to talk to police that work in child porn and see just what levels paedophiles go too.....you do seem to think they all think alike
do you think a lot of children do not mature before the age of 13?????????????......
why do you think a lot of paedos go to Lombok because they mature earlier over there...
you want to split hairs over a girl of 17 + 364 days..
.whats the difference in a girl 12 + 364 days...
you are making drama out of a word..
in my book I know exactly what I would call someone if he touched my daughter... at 12. and 364 or 13 and 1 day... it would be the same thing..
to each his own I wouldnt dare argue with a male who is in charge of not only making the laws but interpreting them I will leave it with you.