cods wrote on Jun 13
th, 2014 at 8:29am:
your comprehension isnt good is it..
I dont recall saying he is guilty and I dont recall saying she is innocent..
Did you forget this post so soon?
cods wrote on Jun 11
th, 2014 at 5:21pm:
its very very sad.. but as a grown man he shouldnt have done what he has been accused of..
he isnt brain damaged...
what on earth was he thinking every time he touched a child where he had no business touching her
it went on over almost 20 years...
unless you have been molested as a child.. we can never really understand what it has been like for them...and to have sympathy for the perp... well Im sorry but my thoughts are with the victims...he was an adult they were kids....
How can you even dare claim not to have said he is guilty after posting that crap? You straight out said that he did do what he was accused of.
Quote:all I am asking is
if you were the judge what evidence would you ask the victim to provide..
you are the one claiming there is no evidence...so he must be found not guilty..
I dont need your little comments about what I may and may not be HAPPY about
...I am just putting in my opinion just like everyone else...
so if you havent got an
answer..which I presume you havent as you keep coming back with another.. ho hum post..
c an you not just say so...
I think a few others would like to know..
exactly what evidence a child should collect when they are being groped....
You don't get how this works. You are the one who has been pushing the line that he is guilty. You are also the one claiming that evidence is impossible to get so we shouldn't expect any. I have never said that there is no evidence or that he should be found not guilty as I have no idea if he is or not. I have however taken issue at your man hating BS about how laws protect men and that when it comes down to a
he said she said situation that she should be the one to be believed without any evidence presented.