Sex Pistol's Johnny Rotten Warns About Jimmy Savile, But Was Cut By the BBC

Published on Jun 27, 2014
By http://www.GnosticWarrior.com - In the video below, the Sex Pistols ex-lead singer John Lydon, aka Johnny Rotten, was interviewed by the BBC in late 1978. In the video Johnny Lyndon said he would like make a movie and kill about 200 people. One of the people he names is Jimmy Savile.

Rotten said, "I'd like to kill Jimmy Savile. I think he's a hypocrite and I think he is into all kinds of seediness. They all know that, but we are not allowed to talk about it. I know some rumors. I bet none of this will be allowed out."

Of course it takes a punk rocker such as Johnny Rotten to tell the truth and world about a crazed child predator that raped countless children over the years. This video below proves how the media is bought off, and many people who witness or know about these child crimes are simply weak pathetic souless pieces of human poo who have sold their souls for a paycheck or place in our sick society.
Category
Education

Aussie wrote on Jun 27^th, 2014 at 5:00pm:




why bring this guy into it????... what he did and got away with has nothing to do with this case at all....you are bringing in all sorts of red herrings to back up what you always try to do.. its a miscarriage of justice....there are 4 women in this case but there were many more who came forward and ten more who were witness'...

who claimed Rolf fondled them in very inappropriate ways in most cases when they were children.....

.some seem to think those children should have kept evidence to show when they were old enough to bring charges... ..

now you think each case should have been held separately even though they are almost identical and virtually say this person had a problem with keeping his hands off children...

where as if each was dealt singularly   it would/could be assessed as being a one off....and therefore a mistake on his part or a misunderstanding on the childs part,

even adults have claimed his hands wandered over their bodies...but wandering hands were not an issue years ago for adults...

to me its like the Royal into child abuse.....no matter what it was how small it was

IT WAS WRONG..

and those that are found guilty should pay for it..... each and every person is being heard...and thats whats important..

Interestingly, this came up on the tele when I was down the gym this morning, the gym instructor (female 38 years old) asked me what I thought. I said he most likely did some fondling and other gross stuff but hey! lucky the girls who were not touched up a bit at the time. Some girls would have told someone (mother or older sister) and the stock answer was to suck it up and keep away from dirty old men.

I then said to her, you are from a later era than me, it wouldn't have been as prevalent in your day. She said "wan't to bet" out of 15 of her school friends that she has kept in touch with, all but three were touched inappropriately (mostly by someone known to them). Imagine if all those incidences were to front court, the courts would be blocked for years and what's the point in the end? Mostly one off incidences where the victim knew to keep their distance from troublesome adults.

She said all we can do is educate our kids so that they may escape it. I agree. I used to go through all sorts of scenarios with my kids when they were young. What would you do if...............

Who would go the police back then if someone touched their kids up? Who would go to the police now if the same thing happened? I think most people are loathe to make a fuss, especially knowing the outcome might not be worth the trouble. Don't get me wrong, serious molestation and rape should always be reported, but is there an invisible line?

I'm starting to think that in Rolf's case, the media are blowing it out of proportion to the alleged crime. He's the scapegoat.

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jun 28^th, 2014 at 8:33am:


Nonsense.

It's this kind of defensive thinking on behalf of these creeps that had Jimmy Savile laughing all the way to the Children's Wards.

What I'd like to see is a witch-hunt of every bastard who protected Jimmy Savile during all his years as a rampaging paedophile in a score of hospitals and at the television studios.

Hunt them all down and arraign them before a court for stiff sentencing.

Doctors, nurses, hospital staff, BBC management ... get them all brought in to face their just desserts.

 

cods wrote on Jun 28^th, 2014 at 8:49am:



It's all good and well in theory, but not practical. Most cases wouldn't even get to court, only high profile cases seem to be taken seriously.

These women probably wouldn't even know the name of their abusers, if it was the ice cream man or the local preacher, it happened decades ago, people move on, they get married, have their own families, they put it behind them although it's probably always somewhere at the back of their mind. If it was a family member people don't want to be the cause of family trouble. I really think it has to be tackled at the time or left to disappear into history.

I would definitely presume that most of the offenders were repeat fiddlers, they would hardly just target one kid.

Nah....let sleeping dogs lie, I say. Too little proof and way too late to take action. Look at some of the alleged victims of Harris, they went through hell on the witness stand, called all sorts of liars. Do you think everyone wants to put themselves through that?

People are starting to speak up these days which is a good thing, no one should get away with kiddy fiddling, no one.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jun 28^th, 2014 at 9:24am:


Strange? I've never seen such an evil face outside of a Hollywood horror movie.

cods wrote on Jun 28^th, 2014 at 9:51am:



Well it depends on what happened to her and the other women, I would think some could have been more serious than others. She said she wasn't raped but she didn't go into detail. I think it's a very personal thing if people choose to report it or not. I don't think that everyone who rings up the rape crises centre would end up pressing charges, some choose not to and it's their decision.

If my grand daughter was old enough to be unsupervised around celebrities, I would ask them what they wanted to do about it after giving them all the possible options. Fortunately schools and hospitals have a bit more security than they used to and I don't think celebrities are aloud to roam around at will these days.