Mathew
New Member
Offline
Australian Politics
Posts: 25
Gender:
|
Inst it interesting the trend of Australian politicians to keep blindly supporting "multiculturalism", but wont specify to what extend it is no longer beneficial? Will diversity benefit Australia when the historical Australian majority of European descent who founded and molded the unique western civilization of Australia are just 60% of the population instead of the current 80%, down from 90% just 10 years ago? Will it still be beneficial when they are then reduced to a minority at 40%, and have everything that Australia is known today transformed ethnically, culturally, politically and socially? Many leftist multicultists are discarding and disregarding Australia as a western nation altogether, ignoring the fact it has its own richly established identity and historical communities, and instead blindly support rapid "diversity" AKA multiracialism (Strictly less people of European descent) which has utterly failed in Britain, USA, and other western nations.
How is it more of a strength to see less people of your own cultural and ethnic background when you walk down the street, and instead have them replaced with people who are the most unlike, culturally, biologically, and historically speaking? This is not a model that prevails over homogeneity. Nations aren't founded and don't thrive upon different ethnic groups with different political, religious and ethnic beliefs all living within the same landmass fighting for their own ethnic interests.
The racial discrimination repeal simply allows dialogue to exist, without being shouted down and silenced with accusations of "racism" or "hate-speech". Nobody is going to listen to fuming racist bigots anyway. Are the opponents of this discrimination bill repeal really saying that Anglo-Australians should not be allowed to have intellectual discussions on social and ethnic issues in their nation, never-loan determine their own ethnic destiny, because they are an irresponsible and dangerous people who if left to fully express themselves will commit racial injustices? Any bigoted bogan racist would be laughed down and discredited by the general Austrlaian population, but apparently Australians are too stupid and morally inferior that they'd go killing non-whites, so they need the guidance of morally superior leftists and non-whites via dialogue restraining laws. Many of whom find White Australians as an outdated people who need to "embrace" the dominating, overpowering demographic and cultural transformation taking place in Australia today, rendering it slowly unrecognizable, and glossed over as "multiculturalism" by the mainstream media. If you dont unconditionally support this, then you are automatically a "racist"
A great example of the attack of sovereignty of the Anglo-Australian majority in Australia is the recent development with "Neighbours", the Australian television drama show. This show now has to include non-European characters from non-white pressure groups and leftists, due to the demographic non-white increase in Australia.
*Source* en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neighbours#History
This really is a powerful indication that the historical ethnic majority are no longer allowed to exist exclusively as a group due to the mass immigration that has, and is continuing to transform the face of the nation. Nobody would dare say that that Japan is too Japanese, though, or Nigeria too Nigerian.
Do people not realize, after seeing throughout history that once an ethnic group declines to a certain extent, along with it goes their culture, political influences, heritage and protection, and even history is rewritten. Why would any healthy, non-suicidal group willfully destroy itself. Its sad that the once-proud Anglo-Australians are now accepting their own demise, because the mainstream media has conditioned them to believe any form of European racial solidarity is evil, therefore they should discard their own national majority status.
We are talking about extinguishing a nation of people, at least to a certain extent, and reshaping its cultural makeup. Non-whites who read this will naturally oppose this because they see it as a threat, just like any European descended immigrants living in a non-white nation would also oppose calls to halt their influence and migration.
The sad thing about this all is, its all totally unnecessary. Why alter the face of a nation unless it needs to be done? Politicians say the reason for these extreme immigration policies is solely for economic stimulation. They wouldn't actually dare to try and insult you and fool you by saying White Australians would culturally benefit from declining as a distinguished nation and ethnic group by being assimilated into non-Australian migrant groups, so instead they sell it by saying its required for the nation to economically stay afloat, which is an absolute falsehood. It is for the financial interests of a capitalist structure, headed by lobby groups. Political correctness is their weapon used for implementing it.
But here's a word to the general population. There is no point in having a temporarily stimulated economy through mass immigration, so that the declining Anglo-Australian majority can have flat screen TVs, while being displaced when they walk down the road. Do people not see the crucial priorities of nationhood here, which is to simply remain?
Article courtesy of AngloNZ.Blogspot.com
|