You think that's bad? Try having a look at the contracts of surgeons etc that "service" public hospitals, if you can?
They get priority of all theatres etc for their private patients, all those costs borne by the public hospital, and they can at any time bypass the public waiting list to do so.
Do you wonder at the waiting times for serious operations? That's why, they are required to do the public ones as per their contracts, but they get to choose when and who they do. They can opt out at any time without penalty, they are the "gods" of the system, answerable to no-one! Their private patients get priority at all times in wards, services, and everything else, at public expense!
For this they are paid huge fees, and they as a group generally get to dictate those fees and their remuneration packages, three MONTHS paid leave is almost standard, and of course they are entitled to keep seeing private patients and using up public resources to do so, and be paid for that, while technically " on leave".
I nurse I knew who worked in Admin at a public hospital once told me that a small group of surgeons and their perks represented over 60% of that hospitals annual budget!
I've been told also that back when the Feds inflicted a parliament etc on the ACT, despite a local referendum that rejected that, then that parliament attempted to put surgeons on straightforward employment contracts, so all the surgeons black-listed Canberra hospitals in retaliation!
But it's not about the money, oh no, of course not, just as it's not about the money when there's 1 doctor per 400 in Sydney's northern suburbs compared to 1 for every 4000 in the Western 'burbs, and country practices have to import foreign docs because no Aussie one will work out there
Is it any wonder they scrapped the Hippocratic Oath for their graduation ceremony's?