Torpedo wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 12:00am:


Sure, but define "adult" and don't give me an answer manufactured by 20th century politicians.

Quote:



Quote:

Quote:


Despite Muhammed never mentioning the concept once? How does consent work in the context of slavery?

Quote:


So the punishment is in fact the same - the only difference is the liklihood of conviction?

Quote:


If a slave woman is raped, the owner of the slave is compensated for the reduced value of the slave. This depends, in part, on whether the slave is a virgin, how old or good looking she is, and what her market value is.

Quote:


The punishment is death in the case adultery, regardless of whether the woman consented.

Quote:


So Islamic law is not timeless?

Quote:


Yes I have heard that excuse before. "I swear your honour, she looked 18". Not sure how that works with your 6 year old neighbour. Did she have a fake ID? Did she deceive and seduce Muhammed?

Yadda wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 9:21am:



SCENARIO;
Mohammed [the messenger of Allah] approaches a small 6-9 year old girl while she is playing with her dolls.

Mohammed;
"Aisha, would you like to marry me ?"

Aisha;
"Yes OK.  Will i still be able to play with my dollies ?"

Mohammed;
"Of course you will - my little treasure!!"




True_Colours,

As a moslem, you are OK with Mohammed getting procuring the 'consent' of a small child, to marry him ?

i.e.
So that the consequence would be, that Mohammed could - LAWFULLY - take Aisha to his bed, AND HAVE SEX WITH HER !! ?

Muslims interpret sexual maturity to mean the onset of puberty. Thus, it is entirely possible that Aisha was sexually mature when Muhammed had his way with her. She may have even had breast buds. How could you expect Muhammed to restrain himself then?

This is one of TC's favourite topics. According to him, science proves it is OK to have sex with little girls.

mo was the perfect example of how to react to little girls. islam says so.

freediver wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 6:27pm:


Its the one that starts "thou shalt shag".

Soren wrote on May 25^th, 2014 at 9:50pm:


Soren, if you are going to post You Tube commentators could you please identify them?

Thank you.

Peter Freedman wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 8:55pm:




Sweden Democrat Party politician Michael Hess of Karlskrona was sentenced today (May 8, 2014) to a fine for hate speech after having connected the religion of Islam with rape.

According to the judgment, the statement is not part of a “factual and authoritative discussion” and it thus it does not matter whether or not the statement is true.

The indictment concerned a comment on Facebook that Hess wrote next to an article in Aftonbladet, which was about women who were raped in Tahrir Square in Cairo.

“When are you journalists going to realize that it is deeply ingrained in Islamic culture to rape and mistreat those women who do not abide by the teachings of Islam? [Data] is widely available showing the connection between the rapes in Sweden and number of migrants from Middle Eastern and North African countries,” wrote the SD politician.

Hess, who has lived in the Middle East for eleven years, argued that the comment did in fact initiate a debate and persuade journalists to examine the phenomenon more deeply.

As proof of his innocence, Michael Hess including a summary of studies showing that men with ancestry from Muslim countries are very much overrepresented in Swedish rape statistics. This includes official figures from the National Council, which show that men from North Africa and Iraq are involved in rapes 23 and 20 times more often than Swedes.

Fined 32,000 krona

Alderman Lise-Lotte Backstrom and the three Social Democratic jurors at Blekinge District Court, however, took no account of the politician’s objections, and  fined him  32,000 krona ($4,900 US)  for “hate speech”.

http://www.friatider.se/sd-politiker-d-ms-f-r-islamkritik