Aussie wrote on Jun 8
th, 2014 at 3:19pm:
Torpedo wrote on Jun 8
th, 2014 at 12:30pm:
So, this image is ok, so long we don't see what happens later, right!???
Oh no, this is not a representation of any culture, lets pretend anyway
That image is fine by me. For all I know, he could be an Aussie, as might the female who may be his Grand-daughter. Or he might be a Muslem as might she. I don't care about that image. It contains nothing which puts it in breach of the
child pornography material provisions of the C'wealth Criminal Code.
You see, that image is totally not fine by me, yet, I am not proposing to censor it.
Why am I not ok: because if it is related to arranged marriage, which in my opinion the photo is strongly suggesting, then this is appalling in my view, because the girl is obviously underage...
also, we all know very well, we have eye witnesses, we have news all over the world, we know victims who claim this, that muslim community, in accordance with (their own, man made) sharia law does in fact let this kind of game to sink through, sometimes illegally, and in other instances, as we have many times witnessed, demand this to be legal, because apparently, i.e. TrueColours, West is deluded regarding the real adult age, it should in fact be the at time of menzies, and is ok to marry someone with first signs of boobs, i.e. "who looks like an adult" (c)
So you see some cartoon image as completely disturbing, and the words expressed freely by some radical dude is totally acceptable?
Why is this guy not being reprimanded? It is a public forum, and some people will actually consider it as a proposal to apply this idea into the reality.. :\
Is it because the forum will lose its value if he had left it?
Is it because IT IS actually appropriate to say this, in your opinion?