Karnal
|
FD, if you want to learn about truth, love and soul-force, I invite you to Google Gandhiji’s notion of Satyagraha, or "truth force".
This is the correct, apologist-approved version of criticism in this thread from here on, so please read up on it.
If you want to have a debate, I pose this: how different would India be if Gandhi merely organised a conventional Hindu-nationalist resistance movement against the British - the sort of independence movement all the other upper-crust Hindus wanted at the time?
No passive resistance, no civil disobedience, no coalition with Muslims, no "appeasement" of British officers and concessions to the British Crown. No mass demonstrations of self-sacrifice. No sitting in jails and fasting close to death.
In my view? Absolutely the same. The Muslims partitioned, The British went anyway. And those Gandhi helped to rise to power, like Nehru, went completely against Gandhi’s ideas for development, inevitably turning India into the polluted, urban-sprawled, industrialized (but, in some parts, technologically savvy) country it is today.
But where would we apologists be?
Without real-life examples like Gandhiji and Nelson Mandella, we’d all be on this board posting pictures of decapitated human heads and telling fibs about people we don’t like.
Satyagraha. It didn’t do Gandhi much good in the end, but we apologists wouldn’t be trying to censor your Freeedom without it.
|