Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
Send Topic Print
apologist-approved criticsm (Read 9098 times)
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96744
Re: apologist-approved criticsm
Reply #45 - Jun 15th, 2014 at 1:24pm
 
moses wrote on Jun 15th, 2014 at 10:31am:
It is very much a thread about true muslims.

What else are you apologizing for, if not the degenerate islamic qur'an / hadi'th and those true believers who follow to the core, the last clear and true scriptures of islam, which are the root cause of their debauched, perverted behaviour?

You also apologize for the false so called moderate muslim, who refuses to decry and ridicule the depravity of the commands of allah, the teachings of muhammad and the verses in the qur'an / hadi'th which provoke the blood lust and degeneracy of true muslims.

There will never be any progress in the islamic world until someone starts telling the truth.

But then we all know what that means don't we? ( the violent end of islam, the blood will flow thick and fast, as muslims sort out who's right and wrong)

Truth is the enemy of islam.


This thread is about me,. Stop changing the subject.

We are indeed in for a bloodbath in the Middle East. As George Bush said, demokracy can be a messy business, and as the leader of the Freee world, he should know. Someone recently compared the current situation in Iraq and Syria to the 30 years war in Europe, a 17th century conflict that errupted between Catholic and Protestant states.

I hope you don’t apologize for that.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96744
Re: apologist-approved criticsm
Reply #46 - Jun 15th, 2014 at 1:31pm
 
freediver wrote on Jun 15th, 2014 at 11:42am:
The truth is that Muhammed was a pacifist. When he said to kill gays, he meant only the inhospitable ones, not the loving, gentle ones. You can tell this from the context.

Is this a truth you approve of Karnal?


Absolutely not. I can’t stand loving and gentle gays. I prefer ones who put up a bit of a struggle - like the old boy.

If you don’t mind me saying, you don’t give in too easily yourself, FD. Still, we’re all good friends at the end of the day, and that’s the important thing.

Freeedom and demokracy types, Karmic Khristians, Huns, PBs, Muslims.

Gud is great, no?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mattywisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1373
Gender: male
Re: apologist-approved criticsm
Reply #47 - Jun 15th, 2014 at 1:40pm
 
Karnal wrote on Jun 15th, 2014 at 1:31pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 15th, 2014 at 11:42am:
The truth is that Muhammed was a pacifist. When he said to kill gays, he meant only the inhospitable ones, not the loving, gentle ones. You can tell this from the context.

Is this a truth you approve of Karnal?


Absolutely not. I can’t stand loving and gentle gays. I prefer ones who put up a bit of a struggle - like the old boy.

If you don’t mind me saying, you don’t give in too easily yourself, FD. Still, we’re all good friends at the end of the day, and that’s the important thing.

Freeedom and demokracy types, Karmic Khristians, Huns, PBs, Muslims.

Gud is great, no?



Awe you're so funny  Grin

Gud is great, no?

He makes snackbars  Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49500
At my desk.
Re: apologist-approved criticsm
Reply #48 - Jun 15th, 2014 at 2:10pm
 
You never did clarify this one Karnal:

freediver wrote on Jun 14th, 2014 at 7:23pm:
Karnal wrote on Jun 14th, 2014 at 7:11pm:
Good point on restraint - I completely agree. Truth, however, is not intellectual. It’s built on compassion and mutual understanding.

Ghandi gave interviews.


Ah, nothing to do with facts then? We must base our criticism on compassion and mutual understanding, not the facts?

Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96744
Re: apologist-approved criticsm
Reply #49 - Jun 15th, 2014 at 2:17pm
 
freediver wrote on Jun 15th, 2014 at 2:10pm:
You never did clarify this one Karnal:

freediver wrote on Jun 14th, 2014 at 7:23pm:
Karnal wrote on Jun 14th, 2014 at 7:11pm:
Good point on restraint - I completely agree. Truth, however, is not intellectual. It’s built on compassion and mutual understanding.

Ghandi gave interviews.


Ah, nothing to do with facts then? We must base our criticism on compassion and mutual understanding, not the facts?



Now why don’t you tell me exactly what you want me to clarify, FD? I can then sign off on it and we can take it from there.

Alternatively, you can type up the confession in another language and get me to sign that.

No worries.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49500
At my desk.
Re: apologist-approved criticsm
Reply #50 - Jun 15th, 2014 at 2:25pm
 
You started by insisting our criticism must be based on facts. Then you changed your mind and suggested it should be based on truth instead. Then you changed tack again with "Truth, however, is not intellectual. It’s built on compassion and mutual understanding."

How are we supposed to figure out what criticism you think we should be free to make?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96744
Re: apologist-approved criticsm
Reply #51 - Jun 15th, 2014 at 2:29pm
 
Are you cranky about something, FD? You seem a little - unsettled.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49500
At my desk.
Re: apologist-approved criticsm
Reply #52 - Jun 15th, 2014 at 4:44pm
 
To what extent did Gandhi attempt to censor discussion of British troops beating Indian protestors?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96744
Re: apologist-approved criticsm
Reply #53 - Jun 15th, 2014 at 4:56pm
 
FD, if you want to learn about truth, love and soul-force, I invite you to Google Gandhiji’s notion of Satyagraha, or "truth force".

This is the correct, apologist-approved version of criticism in this thread from here on, so please read up on it.

If you want to have a debate, I pose this: how different would India be if Gandhi merely organised a conventional Hindu-nationalist resistance movement against the British - the sort of independence movement all the other upper-crust Hindus wanted at the time?

No passive resistance, no civil disobedience, no coalition with Muslims, no "appeasement" of British officers and concessions to the British Crown. No mass demonstrations of self-sacrifice. No sitting in jails and fasting close to death.

In my view? Absolutely the same. The Muslims partitioned, The British went anyway. And those Gandhi helped to rise to power, like Nehru, went completely against Gandhi’s ideas for development, inevitably turning India into the polluted, urban-sprawled, industrialized (but, in some parts, technologically savvy) country it is today.

But where would we apologists be?

Without real-life examples like Gandhiji and Nelson Mandella, we’d all be on this board posting pictures of decapitated human heads and telling fibs about people we don’t like.

Satyagraha. It didn’t do Gandhi much good in the end, but we apologists wouldn’t be trying to censor your Freeedom without it.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 15th, 2014 at 5:04pm by Karnal »  
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49500
At my desk.
Re: apologist-approved criticsm
Reply #54 - Jun 15th, 2014 at 5:04pm
 
I don't think you represent the views of either Gandhi or Mandela.

To what extent did Gandhi attempt to censor discussion of British troops beating Indian protestors?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96744
Re: apologist-approved criticsm
Reply #55 - Jun 15th, 2014 at 5:06pm
 
freediver wrote on Jun 15th, 2014 at 5:04pm:
I don't think you represent the views of either Gandhi or Mandela.

To what extent did Gandhi attempt to censor discussion of British troops beating Indian protestors?


I have no idea -he wrote about the beatings himself.

And you didn’t answer my question.

Google: Taqqiya.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49500
At my desk.
Re: apologist-approved criticsm
Reply #56 - Jun 15th, 2014 at 5:24pm
 
Quote:
he wrote about the beatings himself


Were these "good words"?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96744
Re: apologist-approved criticsm
Reply #57 - Jun 15th, 2014 at 5:35pm
 
freediver wrote on Jun 15th, 2014 at 5:24pm:
Quote:
he wrote about the beatings himself


Were these "good words"?


You can read them in his book; an Autobiography: the Story of My Experiments with Truth.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96744
Re: apologist-approved criticsm
Reply #58 - Jun 15th, 2014 at 5:37pm
 
freediver wrote on Jun 15th, 2014 at 5:24pm:
Quote:
he wrote about the beatings himself


Were these "good words"?


You can read them in his book; an Autobiography: the Story of My Experiments with Truth.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49500
At my desk.
Re: apologist-approved criticsm
Reply #59 - Jun 15th, 2014 at 6:05pm
 
This is what you claimed about Gandhi:

Quote:
He wouldn’t have a bad word said about the British after the salt marches, where Indian protesters were beaten by British soldiers.


Was this based on the facts, or the truth that is within you?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
Send Topic Print