moses
|
There are always two sides to any story.
One side is based on truth substantiated by verifiable facts.
The other side is based on deceit and lies.
In the case of who or what is a Christian, the two sides of the claim have to be taken into account E.G.:
Are there any confirmable facts, which establish the criteria for being a Christian?
An undisputed fact would be the standards set by Christ in His teachings:
Mat 15:9 But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
Mar 7:7 Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
Mat 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
Mat 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
Mat 7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
So an unchallenged fact is that Christ certainly set a criteria for being a Christian.
What man does or thinks is beside the point. Christ set the rules they are supreme in Christian doctrine.
Now go to the other side of the dispute, where muslim apologists try to equate Christianity with their fraudulent statements.
The deceitful muslim apologist is using what is known as:
A priori knowledge of Christianity
From the dictionary priori means:
Adjective: a priori Involving deductive reasoning from a general principle to a necessary effect; not supported by fact
Adverb: a priori Derived by logic, without observed fact
So there it is, not a single fact to support a muslim apologist's statement, simply fabricated lies / the logic of deceit to suit themselves, to obtain the necessary effect.
|