Should an Islamic scholar like this be ignored or dismissed?

Soren wrote on Jun 19^th, 2014 at 10:48pm:




Then how do you explain places like china, indonesia, malaysia, parts of africa, yemen, who where conquered by the muslims without killing apostates or by the sword?

Then how do you explain places like china, indonesia, malaysia, parts of africa, yemen, who where conquered by the muslims without killing apostates or by the sword?

When one thinks of mass murder, Hitler comes to mind. If not Hitler, then Tojo, Stalin, or Mao. Credit is given to the 20th-century totalitarians as the worst species of tyranny to have ever arisen. However, the alarming truth is that Islam has killed more than any of these, and may surpass all of them combined in numbers and cruelty.
The enormity of the slaughters of the "religion of peace" are so far beyond comprehension that even honest historians overlook the scale. When one looks beyond our myopic focus, Islam is the greatest killing machine in the history of mankind, bar none.
     The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. -- Will Durant, as quoted on Daniel Pipes site.
Conservative estimates place the number at 80 million dead Indians.
     According to some calculations, the Indian (subcontinent) population decreased by 80 million between 1000 (conquest of Afghanistan) and 1525 (end of Delhi Sultanate). -- Koenrad Elst as quoted on Daniel Pipes site
80 Million?! The conquistadors' crimes pale into insignificance at that number. No wonder Hitler admired Islam as a fighting religion. He stood in awe of Islam, whose butchery even he did not surpass.
Over 110 Million Blacks were killed by Islam.
     ... a minumum of 28 Million African were enslaved in the Muslim Middle East.  Since, at least, 80 percent of those captured by Muslim slave traders were calculated to have died before reaching the slave market, it is believed that the death toll from 1400 years of Arab and Muslim slave raids into Africa could have been as high as 112 Millions.  When added to the number of those sold in the slave markets, the total number of African victims of the trans-Saharan and East African slave trade could be significantly higher than 140 Million people. -- John Allembillah Azumah, author of The Legacy of Arab-Islam in Africa: A Quest for Inter-religious Dialogue
Add just those two numbers alone together, and Islam has surpassed the victims of 20th-century totalitarianism. However, it does not end there. Add the millions who died at the hand of Muslims in the Sudan in our lifetime.
Much of Islamic slavery was sexual in nature, with a preference for women. Those men who were captured were castrated. The mulatto children of the women were often killed, which explains why Islam was not demographically shifted towards the black race, unlike slaves in the West, who bore children to breed a mestizo class. Add in those dead children; and we arrive at well over 200 million.

Pasted from <http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/05/the_greatest_murder_machine_in_history.ht...>

and other islamic 'scholars' say kill apostates.
in the koran it says kill.

Islamic scholar (presumably knows the Koran by heart so cannot be challenged for not knowing Islam inside out) says



Should an Islamic scholar like this be ignored or dismissed? Or is he mainstream but uncomfortable when translated?

That must be a syndrome of severe discomfort - Muslim while translated. There should be a word for it.
Suggestions are invited.

The Profit said-
If somebody ( a muslim) discards his religion,kill him.
sunnah.com/bukhari/56/226

Baronvonrort wrote on Jun 20^th, 2014 at 11:29am:


no no, sprint says its death in the quran. I'm eagerly awaiting his quote.

Baronvonrort wrote on Jun 20^th, 2014 at 11:29am:


How many islamic countries don't have death for apostasy Baron?