Australian Politics Forum - Gillard's apologists ignore the truth!

cods Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 88048	Re: Gillard's apologists ignore the truth! Reply #30 - Jun 30^th, 2014 at 5:53pm Dnarever wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 5:48pm: I often come here to read the smellograph. and theres me thinking no decent leftie would ever read anything from the tele...how could you do that dna??...
Back to top	IP Logged

Grendel Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 28080 Gender:	Re: Gillard's apologists ignore the truth! Reply #31 - Jun 30^th, 2014 at 6:27pm It was a good article... one that obviously the rusted-ons will go into the foetal position and denial about.
Back to top	IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 58161
Here
Gender: male

Re: Gillard's apologists ignore the truth!
Reply #32 - Jun 30^th, 2014 at 6:41pm

cods wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 5:53pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 5:48pm:

I often come here to read the smellograph.

and theres me thinking no decent leftie would ever read anything from the tele...how could you do that dna??...

There was a time that I read Akerman all the time, nothing more funny than his biased rubbish - very much like this article.

Back to top

IP Logged

Life_goes_on Gold Member Offline Posts: 4772 400kms south of Yobsville, Qld Gender:	Re: Gillard's apologists ignore the truth! Reply #33 - Jun 30^th, 2014 at 6:42pm Who or what is/was a "Gillard"? Does anybody care anymore?
Back to top	"You're just one lucky motherf-cker" - Someone, 5th February 2013 Num num num num. IP Logged

Dnarever Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 58161 Here Gender:	Re: Gillard's apologists ignore the truth! Reply #34 - Jun 30^th, 2014 at 6:42pm Grendel wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 6:27pm: It was a good article... one that obviously the rusted-ons will go into the foetal position and denial about. Is the biased opinion section still next to the comics and mostly funnier?
Back to top	IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40938

Re: Gillard's apologists ignore the truth!
Reply #35 - Jun 30^th, 2014 at 7:05pm

cods wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 4:02pm:

Kat wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 3:43pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 3:36pm:

Link not included as I'm posting from my iPhone for the first time. Article from Daily Telegraph.

And it shows.

Spiteful, baseless comment, lots of lies, and the barest smattering of half-truths.

Yellow gutter-journalism at its pathetic worst.

And no, I wasn't a Gillard supporter, so don't even bother going there.

how about you tell us the REAL truth then kat??>..

has the smh done a review yet?

|dev|null wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 3:45pm:

And the Daily Telegraph is of course unbiased on the matter of Julia Gillard, isn't it?

Gillard was a much better PM than the idiot we presently have as our Dear Leader. She never attacked disabled Australians! Grin

thats right SHE ONLY ATTACKED SINGLE MOTHERS... from memory.....ooops didnt she vote against a pay increase for pensioners as well>>oooops Roll Eyes

own goal.

Gillard introduced the NDIS, which rather proves her credentials compared to Tone Rabbit as far as regard for the disabled goes, I think.

Gillard was actually a skilled negotiator. During her term as PM of a minority government she retained the confidence of the House and has all her legislative agenda passed, often it should be noted with the support of the Coalition.

The Coalition, despite all it's histrionics was unable to garner the numbers in the House to pass a vote of no-confidence and in fact never tried. Instead all they did was disrupt proceedings and insult her as much as possible. The only thing we've seen change is that they are the Government and they use the "c" word to describe the Leader of the Opposition, something no one in Labor ever has.

I think she deserves a lot more credit than she necessarily gets. Indeed, most of the criticism of her performance centres around her femininity which is IMO sexism. Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 74257 Gender:	Re: Gillard's apologists ignore the truth! Reply #36 - Jun 30^th, 2014 at 7:12pm look at all the righties salivating over an opinion piece ..... why don't you all line up and give Blair a blowjob as a thankyou?
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

DaS Energy

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3962
Gender: male

Re: Gillard's apologists ignore the truth!
Reply #37 - Jun 30^th, 2014 at 7:27pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 7:05pm:

cods wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 4:02pm:

Kat wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 3:43pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 3:36pm:

Link not included as I'm posting from my iPhone for the first time. Article from Daily Telegraph.

And it shows.

Spiteful, baseless comment, lots of lies, and the barest smattering of half-truths.

Yellow gutter-journalism at its pathetic worst.

And no, I wasn't a Gillard supporter, so don't even bother going there.

how about you tell us the REAL truth then kat??>..

has the smh done a review yet?

|dev|null wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 3:45pm:

And the Daily Telegraph is of course unbiased on the matter of Julia Gillard, isn't it?

Gillard was a much better PM than the idiot we presently have as our Dear Leader. She never attacked disabled Australians! Grin

thats right SHE ONLY ATTACKED SINGLE MOTHERS... from memory.....ooops didnt she vote against a pay increase for pensioners as well>>oooops Roll Eyes

own goal.

Gillard introduced the NDIS, which rather proves her credentials compared to Tone Rabbit as far as regard for the disabled goes, I think.

Gillard was actually a skilled negotiator. During her term as PM of a minority government she retained the confidence of the House and has all her legislative agenda passed, often it should be noted with the support of the Coalition.

The Coalition, despite all it's histrionics was unable to garner the numbers in the House to pass a vote of no-confidence and in fact never tried. Instead all they did was disrupt proceedings and insult her as much as possible. The only thing we've seen change is that they are the Government and they use the "c" word to describe the Leader of the Opposition, something no one in Labor ever has.

I think she deserves a lot more credit than she necessarily gets. Indeed, most of the criticism of her performance centres around her femininity which is IMO sexism. Roll Eyes

Keep reading of such but never see such, its pure bullshit!

Back to top

IP Logged

Armchair_Politician

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25821
Gender: male

Re: Gillard's apologists ignore the truth!
Reply #38 - Jun 30^th, 2014 at 7:40pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 7:05pm:

cods wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 4:02pm:

Kat wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 3:43pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 3:36pm:

Link not included as I'm posting from my iPhone for the first time. Article from Daily Telegraph.

And it shows.

Spiteful, baseless comment, lots of lies, and the barest smattering of half-truths.

Yellow gutter-journalism at its pathetic worst.

And no, I wasn't a Gillard supporter, so don't even bother going there.

how about you tell us the REAL truth then kat??>..

has the smh done a review yet?

|dev|null wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 3:45pm:

And the Daily Telegraph is of course unbiased on the matter of Julia Gillard, isn't it?

Gillard was a much better PM than the idiot we presently have as our Dear Leader. She never attacked disabled Australians! Grin

thats right SHE ONLY ATTACKED SINGLE MOTHERS... from memory.....ooops didnt she vote against a pay increase for pensioners as well>>oooops Roll Eyes

own goal.

Gillard introduced the NDIS, which rather proves her credentials compared to Tone Rabbit as far as regard for the disabled goes, I think.

Gillard was actually a skilled negotiator. During her term as PM of a minority government she retained the confidence of the House and has all her legislative agenda passed, often it should be noted with the support of the Coalition.

The Coalition, despite all it's histrionics was unable to garner the numbers in the House to pass a vote of no-confidence and in fact never tried. Instead all they did was disrupt proceedings and insult her as much as possible. The only thing we've seen change is that they are the Government and they use the "c" word to describe the Leader of the Opposition, something no one in Labor ever has.

I think she deserves a lot more credit than she necessarily gets. Indeed, most of the criticism of her performance centres around her femininity which is IMO sexism. Roll Eyes

First of all, the NDIS wasn't fully funded and secondly her gender had zero to do with her downfall. It was all about her policies and her incompetence - the same reasons for Rudd's downfall TWICE!!!

Back to top

Scott Morrison DID wipe the floor with Bull Shitten!!!

IP Logged

Grendel

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male

Re: Gillard's apologists ignore the truth!
Reply #39 - Jun 30^th, 2014 at 10:24pm

Dnarever wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 6:42pm:

Grendel wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 6:27pm:

It was a good article... one that obviously the rusted-ons will go into the foetal position and denial about.

Is the biased opinion section still next to the comics and mostly funnier?

Like I said...

Rusted-on
Denial...

Back to top

IP Logged

Grendel

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male

Re: Gillard's apologists ignore the truth!
Reply #40 - Jun 30^th, 2014 at 10:27pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 7:05pm:

cods wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 4:02pm:

Kat wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 3:43pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 3:36pm:

Link not included as I'm posting from my iPhone for the first time. Article from Daily Telegraph.

And it shows.

Spiteful, baseless comment, lots of lies, and the barest smattering of half-truths.

Yellow gutter-journalism at its pathetic worst.

And no, I wasn't a Gillard supporter, so don't even bother going there.

how about you tell us the REAL truth then kat??>..

has the smh done a review yet?

|dev|null wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 3:45pm:

And the Daily Telegraph is of course unbiased on the matter of Julia Gillard, isn't it?

Gillard was a much better PM than the idiot we presently have as our Dear Leader. She never attacked disabled Australians! Grin

thats right SHE ONLY ATTACKED SINGLE MOTHERS... from memory.....ooops didnt she vote against a pay increase for pensioners as well>>oooops Roll Eyes

own goal.

Gillard introduced the NDIS, which rather proves her credentials compared to Tone Rabbit as far as regard for the disabled goes, I think.

Gillard was actually a skilled negotiator. During her term as PM of a minority government she retained the confidence of the House and has all her legislative agenda passed, often it should be noted with the support of the Coalition.

The Coalition, despite all it's histrionics was unable to garner the numbers in the House to pass a vote of no-confidence and in fact never tried. Instead all they did was disrupt proceedings and insult her as much as possible. The only thing we've seen change is that they are the Government and they use the "c" word to describe the Leader of the Opposition, something no one in Labor ever has.

I think she deserves a lot more credit than she necessarily gets. Indeed, most of the criticism of her performance centres around her femininity which is IMO sexism. Roll Eyes

NDIS? The Libs were going to bring it in too Bwian...
Also I doubt Wong and others voted her out because she was a woman BTW Cheesy

Back to top

IP Logged

Grendel Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 28080 Gender:	Re: Gillard's apologists ignore the truth! Reply #41 - Jun 30^th, 2014 at 10:28pm John Smith wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 7:12pm: look at all the righties salivating over an opinion piece ..... why don't you all line up and give Blair a blowjob as a thankyou? You keep saying that as if opinion pieces are never based on or provide facts Johnboy... how disingenuous of you
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 74257
Gender: male

Re: Gillard's apologists ignore the truth!
Reply #42 - Jun 30^th, 2014 at 11:05pm

Grendel wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 10:28pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 7:12pm:

look at all the righties salivating over an opinion piece .....

why don't you all line up and give Blair a blowjob as a thankyou?

You keep saying that as if opinion pieces are never based on or provide facts Johnboy... how disingenuous of you Cheesy

No, I say that as if opinion pieces are based on opinion ....... thats kinda why they call them .... wait for it .... you got it, Roll Eyes

opinion pieces. Cheesy

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40938

Re: Gillard's apologists ignore the truth!
Reply #43 - Jul 1^st, 2014 at 12:23am

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 7:40pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 7:05pm:

cods wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 4:02pm:

Kat wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 3:43pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 3:36pm:

Link not included as I'm posting from my iPhone for the first time. Article from Daily Telegraph.

And it shows.

Spiteful, baseless comment, lots of lies, and the barest smattering of half-truths.

Yellow gutter-journalism at its pathetic worst.

And no, I wasn't a Gillard supporter, so don't even bother going there.

how about you tell us the REAL truth then kat??>..

has the smh done a review yet?

|dev|null wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 3:45pm:

And the Daily Telegraph is of course unbiased on the matter of Julia Gillard, isn't it?

Gillard was a much better PM than the idiot we presently have as our Dear Leader. She never attacked disabled Australians! Grin

thats right SHE ONLY ATTACKED SINGLE MOTHERS... from memory.....ooops didnt she vote against a pay increase for pensioners as well>>oooops Roll Eyes

own goal.

Gillard introduced the NDIS, which rather proves her credentials compared to Tone Rabbit as far as regard for the disabled goes, I think.

Gillard was actually a skilled negotiator. During her term as PM of a minority government she retained the confidence of the House and has all her legislative agenda passed, often it should be noted with the support of the Coalition.

The Coalition, despite all it's histrionics was unable to garner the numbers in the House to pass a vote of no-confidence and in fact never tried. Instead all they did was disrupt proceedings and insult her as much as possible. The only thing we've seen change is that they are the Government and they use the "c" word to describe the Leader of the Opposition, something no one in Labor ever has.

I think she deserves a lot more credit than she necessarily gets. Indeed, most of the criticism of her performance centres around her femininity which is IMO sexism. Roll Eyes

First of all, the NDIS wasn't fully funded and secondly her gender had zero to do with her downfall.

Actually, it had a great deal to do with it. The attitudes of many on both sides of politics was that she was "barren" and that had "sacrificed her potential child bearing to her political ambitions", things which have never been mentioned about her male predecessors or successors. Perhaps if Tim had been able to have kids, all would have been right? Roll Eyes

Quote:

It was all about her policies and her incompetence - the same reasons for Rudd's downfall TWICE!!!

Yet, as I pointed out, despite her supposed "incompetence", Gilliard got all her legislation through both houses of Parliament despite leading a minority government. She also retained the confidence of the House. Compare that with Tone's performance leading a majority government... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40938

Re: Gillard's apologists ignore the truth!
Reply #44 - Jul 1^st, 2014 at 12:26am

Grendel wrote on Jun 30^th, 2014 at 10:27pm:

NDIS? The Libs were going to bring it in too Bwian...

Yes but only after considerable prodding of the then Opposition leader, Beowulf. Roll Eyes

Quote:

Also I doubt Wong and others voted her out because she was a woman BTW Cheesy

Penny may not have but then how do you explain the attitudes of the then Opposition towards her supposed "barrenness", etc.? Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged