Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 25 26 27 28 
Send Topic Print
Multiculturalism is an anti-Western ideology (Read 32640 times)
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Multiculturalism is an anti-Western ideology
Reply #390 - Mar 18th, 2015 at 8:38am
 
Multiculturalism done right here


Unlike the failed multicultural policies of France, Germany and Britain ("How multiculturalism went wrong and what to do instead", AFR March 13) that have resulted in fragmented societies, alienated minorities and resentful citizenries, the multicultural policies in Australia have been a huge success and have become a pillar of Australian society and democracy. 

Australia can teach Europe and the rest of the world a thing or two on how to develop and implement world class policies that allow its multicultural communities to achieve their aspirations and to preserve their cultural heritage, and at the same time enable them to build a cohesive society.

As a result of its strategic foresight Australia is well placed to meet the challenges of the 21st century characterised by the ongoing need for continuous innovation, collaboration and partnerships in a interdependent world.

Long live Australia.

Ordan Andreevski
Australian Outreach
United Macedonian Diaspora (Australia)
Hawthorn, Vic


http://www.afr.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/mulitculturalism-done-right-here-20150316-1m01l0

Multiculturalism overrated in U.S.


What Thomas Friedman calls “tribalism” in Arab countries (The Republican, March 25), our government calls “multiculturalism” in America, and encourages it.


Why is it any less divisive here than it is there? Perhaps both he and the government are unfamiliar with Teddy Roosevelt’s warning that “The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities.”

– FRANK SALVIDIO, West Springfield

http://www.masslive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2011/03/letters_to_the_editor_multicul.html

Multicultural societies with their consequent fragmentation and chronic ethnic tension are unlikely to meet Jewish needs in the long run even if they do ultimately subvert the demographic and cultural dominance of the peoples of European origin in lands where they have been dominant.

At present the interests of non-European-derived peoples to expand demographically and politically in the United States are widely perceived as a moral imperative, whereas the attempts of the European-derived peoples to retain demographic, political, and cultural control is represented as "racist," immoral, and an indication of psychiatric disorder. From the perspective of these European-derived peoples, the prevailing ethnic morality is altruistic and self-sacrificial. It is unlikely to be viable in the long run, even in an individualistic society. As we have seen, the viability of a morality of self-sacrifice is especially problematic in the context of a multicultural society in which everyone is conscious of group membership and there is between-group competition for resources.

https://archive.org/details/CultureOfCritique

http://www.neoeugenics.net/whither.htm

http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/immigration.pdf

http://web.csulb.edu/~kmacd/books-derbyshire.html
Back to top
 

1387821041368.jpg (248 KB | 45 )
1387821041368.jpg

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Multiculturalism is an anti-Western ideology
Reply #391 - Mar 19th, 2015 at 6:12am
 
Western politicians responsible for rise of Islamic State


Tony Abbott and his "team" are unbelievable. Mr Abbott and the Coalition, as part of the "Coalition of the Willing" through the 2003 invasion of Iraq, are directly responsible for the current mayhem in the Middle East and the rise of Islamic State. Now, Abbott uses this previous folly to try to improve his electoral standing by sending 300 troops to train Iraqi forces. But hang on, haven't Australia and other Western countries spent billions over the past 10 years training Iraq troops? The latest excuse to send our forces to Iraq is to defeat IS – but what threat to Australia is IS? The Martin Place and Victorian examples Abbott cites might have been caused by two disturbed men, inspired by IS. But should we be spending more billions on troops and air power in Iraq because of this? Abbott is very keen for Australia to play its part in dealing with international military issues of limited importance to Australia, such as IS and the Ukraine, but for issues of huge significance to our country, such as climate change, he runs away.

Rod Holesgrove, O'Connor

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/comment/ct-letters/western-politicians-responsible-for-rise-of-islamic-state-20150306-13xnrm.html

Is ISIS (ISIL) a CIA-Mossad Creation? Yes!


https://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2014/09/02/is-isis-isil-a-cia-mossad-creat
ion-yes/

The Relationship Between Washington and ISIS: The Evidence!


https://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/the-relationship-between-washin
gton-and-isis-the-evidence/
Back to top
 

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Multiculturalism is an anti-Western ideology
Reply #392 - Mar 19th, 2015 at 8:18am
 
Israeli army admits aiding al-Qaeda in Syria


An under-noticed news report last week confirmed previously-held suspicions and strong implications that Israeli troops are aiding the Nusra Front, al-Qaeda's official Syrian affiliate.

Speaking to Israeli occupation troops last week, a Wall Street Journal reporter on the ground in Mount Bental (part of the occupied Golan Heights) found that Israeli troops receive wounded al-Qaeda fighters, treat them in Israeli hospitals and send them back to continue fighting against the government in Syria.

The Nusra Front in August overran the Qunaitra crossing, the checkpoint between the Israeli-occupied and Syrian-controlled sectors of the Golan Heights. Israeli invaded that region of south-west Syria in 1967 and has illegally occupied most of the Golan Heights ever since.

As I pointed out in a previous column, the reports of UN peacekeeping forces since Nusra took over the checkpoint were highly suggestive of Israeli contacts and even military aid to the al-Qaeda rebels. But this Wall Street Journal report has confirmed the fact.

"We don't ask who they are, we don't do any screening," the unnamed Israeli military official told the paper of the hospital treatment of al-Qaeda fighters. "Once the treatment is done, we take them back to the border [sic - ceasefire line] and they go on their way [in Syria]," he said.

An unnamed military official also said there is an "understanding" between Israeli forces and al-Qaeda fighters there and that "there is a familiarity of the [al-Qaeda] forces on the ground".

Popular conspiracy theories have it that al-Qaeda and the "Islamic State" (also known as ISIS or ISIL) are Israeli- and/or US-intelligence creations. While there's no evidence for that, it's certainly true that the US-UK invasion of Iraq in 2003, and its consciously sectarian occupation regime of the country thereafter, created the conditions in which al-Qaeda in Iraq (later known as ISIS) was formed and thrived. Veteran journalist Patrick Cockburn demonstrates this most convincingly in his essential new book The Rise of Islamic State, which I have previously lauded here.

And now it seems that Israel is in a direct alliance with al-Qaeda in Syria. This is a tactical alliance, meant purely to bleed the country and prolong the civil war.

Read the quotes from Israeli officials in recent months about the Nusra Front and you will see a strange sort of soft-peddling of the group, casting them as a kind of "moderate al-Qaeda" if you will.

"Nusra is a unique version of al-Qaeda," retired Brigadier General Michael Herzog told the Wall Street Journal. "They manage to cooperate with non-Islamist and non-jihadi organizations in one coalition." Herzog is a fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP, the think tank of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the première Israel lobby group in the US) and former chief of staff for Israel's defence minister. The Nusra Front "are totally focused on the war in Syria and aren't focused on us," he claimed. "But when Hezbollah and Iran and others are pushing south, they are very much focused on us."

Hizballah and Iran, allies of the Bashar al-Assad regime, are aiding the government in Syria and fighting on the ground alongside Syrian army troops against al-Qaeda, the "Islamic State" and other Sunni rebel groups.

Even before Nusra took over the Qunairtra checkpoint in August, reports suggested Israel seemed on rather friendly terms with the al-Qaeda affiliate.

In June, army spokesperson Lieutenant Colonel Peter Lerner told Foreign Policy that the Israeli government has provided medical assistance to more than 1,000 Syrians over the past fourteen months. "We give medical aid to people who are in dire need," he said in a telephone interview with the magazine, echoing the statement made last week to the Wall Street Journal. "We don't do any vetting or check where they are from or which group they are fighting for, or whether they are civilians."

Ehud Yaari, an Israeli fellow at WINEP, admitted that Israeli assistance has benefited fighters: "The wounded are both fighters and civilians but there are not too many civilians left because of the fighting raging there ... Close to 900 Syrians have been treated in Israel."

Foreign Policy reports that, even earlier than June 2014, in March 2013: "Some 400 armed opposition fighters, backed by artillery fire from three tanks, seized a Syrian military outpost atop a hill at Tal al-Garbi, planting four black flags and raising concern that extremist groups are moving into the zone.

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/articles/inquiry/17582-israeli-army-admits-aiding-al-qaeda-in-syria

https://www.facebook.com/372841462744998/photos/a.380060145356463.101085.372841462744998/1049020598460411/?type=1&theater

Netanyahu: 'ISIS is Good for Israel'!


https://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2014/09/20/netanyahu-isis-is-good-for-isra
el/
Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 19th, 2015 at 8:34am by vikaryan »  

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Multiculturalism is an anti-Western ideology
Reply #393 - Mar 20th, 2015 at 8:22am
 
Multiculturalism has not yet done the damage in the U.S. that it has in western European countries — such as England, France and Germany — but it’s on its way. By the way, one need not be a Westerner to hold Western values. Mainly, you just have to accept the supremacy of the individual above all else.

http://www.thenewsstar.com/story/opinion/columnists/2014/09/16/williams-multiculturalism-failure/15708229/

European Union Fails–Nationalism Surging, Multiculturalism Dying


Most critical is the demographic crisis. For a nation to survive, its women must produce on average 2.1 children. Europe has not seen that high a fertility rate in 40 years. Today, it is down to 1.6 children.

Europeans are an aging, shrinking, disappearing, dying race.

And the places of Europe’s unborn are being filled by growing “concentrations of unassimilated and disaffected Muslim immigrants, segregated in neighborhoods like the banlieues of Paris or the satellite ‘dish cities’ of Amsterdam.

http://www.vdare.com/articles/is-the-european-union-dying

Is the European Union Dying?


In an essay, "The E.U. Experiment Has Failed," Bruce Thornton of Hoover Institution makes the case that the verdict is in, the dream is dead, the EU is unraveling, One Europe is finished.

http://www.sunshinestatenews.com/story/european-union-dyin

Quote:
Apparently, the Liberal Party Cult's "ansestors fort for this country" (sic)

Irony eludes them while they bathe in it.


https://www.facebook.com/WhereIsMyOstrich/photos/a.372254872884323.1073741827.372247669551710/670435059732968/?type=1&theater
Back to top
 

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Multiculturalism is an anti-Western ideology
Reply #394 - Mar 20th, 2015 at 8:58am
 
Multicultural Britain has failed


Trevor Phillips should be congratulated, not pilloried, for his honesty and realism. The truth is that multiculturalism has not worked. It has delivered not a tolerant multiracial society but a divisive, compartmentalised society not unlike that of Northern Ireland.

It has unwittingly spawned a political correctness that is almost totalitarian and has enabled widespread abuse and criminality to flourish in Rotherham, Oxford and elsewhere.

What the UK needs is a tolerant monocultural society that embraces and integrates all ethnic groups into UK society while enabling them to maintain their beliefs and cultures. We seem to have lost sight of the adage “When in Rome, do as the Romans do,” and we need, but  don’t have, an overarching shared set of “British” values.

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/letters-growth-yes-if-you-mean-the-national-debt-10119005.html
Back to top
 

2-4-rome-compact.jpg (183 KB | 51 )
2-4-rome-compact.jpg

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Multiculturalism is an anti-Western ideology
Reply #395 - Mar 20th, 2015 at 10:05am
 
Sorry, Nigel Farage, Judeo-Christian nationalism is no answer to failed multiculturalism


What’s the best way to fix the problems created by state-sponsored multiculturalism? According to Nigel Farage, it’s using government power to confirm the worst fears of minority communities.

Farage recently made his debut appearance at the Conservative Political Action Conference, just outside of Washington, DC. He used his time in front of American conservatives and libertarians to tout the notion that government sponsorship of “Judeo-Christian values” is what’s needed to get both Britain and the United States back on track.

On the same day, Farage interviewed with The Daily Caller and called state-sponsored multiculturalism a driver of radical Islam within Britain, the United States, and more broadly,  Western Europe.

While Farage is correct to point out that state-sponsored multiculturalism creates an array of tensions and potential problems, he is completely wrong to suggest that using the power of the state to create a “Judeo-Christian” monoculture is the correct solution. Instead, Farage should recognise that it’s a mistake to think that governments can or should deliberately promote any sort of culture at all.

As the past few decades have shown, state-sponsored multiculturalism is not the proper or helpful role of Western, democratic governments. Policies of this kind have created a rift in British society, causing the progressive values of minority protection and egalitarianism to collide with the classical liberal values of free speech, choice, and toleration.

The best thing that Britain can do is take a step back from the culture wars and recognize that civil society should take the lead in answering what culture should look like. At the same time, that doesn’t preclude the government from taking a firm stance against the violation of individual rights and the foundational values of democracy—namely, free speech.

Tolerating other people’s ideas and lifestyles is necessary and helpful for cultivating a free society—provided that other individuals are not being harmed in the process. Truth is not always obvious, but it emerges from interactions within the marketplace of ideas.

To be clear, we shouldn't have any allusions that this conversation will always be easy or comfortable. The freedom of speech doesn’t also include the freedom from offence, but the conversation itself is necessary and it should occur organically.

Farage rightly sees religious fundamentalism and intolerance as a grave threat to Western democracy, but it’s pure hypocrisy to suggest that instituting a culture of intolerant nationalism is the proper solution. We cannot trust government censors to suppress the wrong ideas or “destructive cultures.” If we give into Farage’s notion, then we are no better than the ruinous theocratic ideas that so many of us are trying to renounce. 

http://www.cityam.com/211244/sorry-nigel-farage-judeo-christian-nationalism-no-answer-failed-multiculturalism
Back to top
 

1402475921739.jpg (183 KB | 45 )
1402475921739.jpg

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
|dev|null
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male
Re: Multiculturalism is an anti-Western ideology
Reply #396 - Mar 24th, 2015 at 1:36pm
 
Bump!  Bump!

|dev|null wrote on Mar 9th, 2015 at 1:14pm:
vikaryan is there any other ethnicity or race other than WASP that you don't hate?  I'm just wondering, thats all... Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin


Back to top
 

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Multiculturalism is an anti-Western ideology
Reply #397 - Mar 30th, 2015 at 11:51am
 
A Response to Neil Katyal and Paul Clement on
the Meaning of a Natural Born Citizen


By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
March 13, 2015

I read the March 11, 2015 article entitled, “On the Meaning of a ‘Natural Born Citizen,” written by Neal Katyal and Paul Clement, found at 128 Harv.L.Rev.F 161, and accessed at http://harvardlawreview.org/2015/03/on-the-meaning-of-natural-born-citizen/ .  The first sentence of the article says:  “We have both had the privilege of heading the Office of the Solicitor General.”  The article repeats the existing talking points offered in support of the constitutional eligibility of Senator Ted Cruz (all born citizens are natural born citizens) and offers nothing new.  Mr. Cruz was born in Canada to a U.S. citizen mother and a non-U.S. citizen (Cuban) father.  I have written a recent article in which I conclude that Mr. Cruz is not a natural born citizen and therefore not eligible to be President because he does not satisfy the one and only common law definition of a natural born citizen confirmed by the unanimous U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875), which is a child born in a country to parents who were its citizens at the time of the child’s birth.  The article is entitled, “What Do President Obama and Senator Cruz Have In Common? They Are Both Not Natural Born Citizens," accessed at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/02/what-do-president-obama-and-senator.html .  Katyal and Clement maintain that any child who becomes a citizen at birth, regardless of where born or by what means, is a natural born citizen.  They add that since Mr. Cruz became a citizen from the moment of birth and did not need any naturalization after birth he is a natural born citizen.  But there is no historical and legal evidence which demonstrates that this is how the Framers defined a natural born citizen and the authors surely have not presented that evidence even if it did exist.

The authors’ argument suffers from the fallacy of bald assertion.  They provide no convincing evidence for their position on who is included as an Article II natural born citizen.  They do not examine what was the source of the Framers' definition of an Article II natural born citizen, let alone what was the definition of a natural born citizen when the Framers drafted and adopted the Constitution and when it was eventually ratified.  They ignore so much of the historical and legal record in coming to their bald conclusions. For a discussion of this historical and legal evidence, see the numerous articles that I have written and posted at my blog, http://puzo1.blogspot.com .

They gloss over what the Framers' purpose was for requiring the President and Commander in Chief of the Military to be a natural born citizen.  They do not engage in any real discussion on what the Framers were trying to achieve through the clause. They dismiss all debate on the subject of foreign influence by flatly stating without any evidence:  "The Framers did not fear such machinations from those who were U.S. citizens from birth just because of the happenstance of a foreign birthplace."

puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/03/a-response-to-neil-katyal-and-paul.html


After two and a half years Obama comes up with an obvious forged birth certificate. If this laughable man thinks Americans are that big of fools, he is dumber than we realized. Naturally everyone knows he has no leadership ability. He is definitely a puppet, being played from behind the scenes by the crooked politicians in office. I bet if a document expert were to examine this forged piece of paper, they would prove beyond a doubt, he is not an American citizen. He is just another illegal immigrant. What next? Forged college documents and bar exam tests?

http://8ch.net/pol/res/1568093.html#1568093

Quote:
>>1592180
>Cruz will get elected.
He's pure puppet, ineligible like obama from having a non US parent, so in other words he has a good chance.

> tea party baby
meh, I guess I'll futilely point out there was the actual tea party movement and the co-opting tea party theme, why bother pointing it out is that it's pointless to reference tea party themed pieces as something meaningful, they're not distinct from the rest of jew neocon puppetry.


http://8ch.net/pol/res/1568093.html#1592512
Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 30th, 2015 at 12:00pm by vikaryan »  

1427450516165.jpg (113 KB | 46 )
1427450516165.jpg

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Multiculturalism is an anti-Western ideology
Reply #398 - Mar 30th, 2015 at 12:24pm
 
vikaryan wrote on Mar 30th, 2015 at 11:51am:
A Response to Neil Katyal and Paul Clement on
the Meaning of a Natural Born Citizen


By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
March 13, 2015

I read the March 11, 2015 article entitled, “On the Meaning of a ‘Natural Born Citizen,” written by Neal Katyal and Paul Clement, found at 128 Harv.L.Rev.F 161, and accessed at http://harvardlawreview.org/2015/03/on-the-meaning-of-natural-born-citizen/ .  The first sentence of the article says:  “We have both had the privilege of heading the Office of the Solicitor General.”  The article repeats the existing talking points offered in support of the constitutional eligibility of Senator Ted Cruz (all born citizens are natural born citizens) and offers nothing new.  Mr. Cruz was born in Canada to a U.S. citizen mother and a non-U.S. citizen (Cuban) father.  I have written a recent article in which I conclude that Mr. Cruz is not a natural born citizen and therefore not eligible to be President because he does not satisfy the one and only common law definition of a natural born citizen confirmed by the unanimous U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875), which is a child born in a country to parents who were its citizens at the time of the child’s birth.  The article is entitled, “What Do President Obama and Senator Cruz Have In Common? They Are Both Not Natural Born Citizens," accessed at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/02/what-do-president-obama-and-senator.html .  Katyal and Clement maintain that any child who becomes a citizen at birth, regardless of where born or by what means, is a natural born citizen.  They add that since Mr. Cruz became a citizen from the moment of birth and did not need any naturalization after birth he is a natural born citizen.  But there is no historical and legal evidence which demonstrates that this is how the Framers defined a natural born citizen and the authors surely have not presented that evidence even if it did exist.

The authors’ argument suffers from the fallacy of bald assertion.  They provide no convincing evidence for their position on who is included as an Article II natural born citizen.  They do not examine what was the source of the Framers' definition of an Article II natural born citizen, let alone what was the definition of a natural born citizen when the Framers drafted and adopted the Constitution and when it was eventually ratified.  They ignore so much of the historical and legal record in coming to their bald conclusions. For a discussion of this historical and legal evidence, see the numerous articles that I have written and posted at my blog, http://puzo1.blogspot.com .

They gloss over what the Framers' purpose was for requiring the President and Commander in Chief of the Military to be a natural born citizen.  They do not engage in any real discussion on what the Framers were trying to achieve through the clause. They dismiss all debate on the subject of foreign influence by flatly stating without any evidence:  "The Framers did not fear such machinations from those who were U.S. citizens from birth just because of the happenstance of a foreign birthplace."

puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/03/a-response-to-neil-katyal-and-paul.html


Quote:
>>1592180
>Cruz will get elected.
He's pure puppet, ineligible like obama from having a non US parent, so in other words he has a good chance.

> tea party baby
meh, I guess I'll futilely point out there was the actual tea party movement and the co-opting tea party theme, why bother pointing it out is that it's pointless to reference tea party themed pieces as something meaningful, they're not distinct from the rest of jew neocon puppetry.


http://8ch.net/pol/res/1568093.html#1592512


it was never about Hawaii...it was about the citizenship of his father!

http://www.zazzle.com/natural_born_tshirt-235558781107996670
Back to top
 

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
|dev|null
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male
Re: Multiculturalism is an anti-Western ideology
Reply #399 - Mar 30th, 2015 at 1:12pm
 
Bump! Bump!  Bump!

|dev|null wrote on Mar 9th, 2015 at 1:14pm:
vikaryan is there any other ethnicity or race other than WASP that you don't hate?  I'm just wondering, thats all... Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin


Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy
Back to top
 

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Multiculturalism is an anti-Western ideology
Reply #400 - Apr 1st, 2015 at 7:52am
 
The Roots of Netanyahu’s Electoral Victory: Colonial Expansion and Fascist Ideology


Benjamin Netanyahu’s re-election makes him the longest serving prime minister in Israel’s history. His 20% margin of victory (30 Knesset seats to 24 for his nearest opponent) underlines the mass base of his consolidation of power.

Most critical commentators cite Netanyahu’s racist pronouncements; his rejection of any two state solution and his overt appeal for a mass Jewish voter turnout to counteract the ‘droves of Arab voters’ for his electoral victories. There is no question that the majority of Israeli Jewish leaders and parties support Netanyahu’s racist pronouncements and ‘no-state’ solution and joined him in a coalition government. But the larger issue is the positive mass response to Netanyahu’s call to action. Nearly three quarters of the electorate turned out (73%) to elect him. Moreover, Netanyahu has been elected prime minister for four terms: between 1996-99 and more recently 2009-20.

What is more, the opposition has not differed from the Netanyahu coalition regime’s Judeo-centric policies and pronouncements. In other words, ‘racist’ ideology per se is not what drives the Israeli majority to repeatedly support Netanyahu.

Jewish-centered racism is an integral and accepted part of Israel’s political culture.

Long past is the notion that Israeli Jews would solve their social -economic problems via a collectivist economy and popular struggle against Jewish plutocrats.

Today Jewish-Israeli millionaires flourish alongside orthodox, secular, Sephardic, Ashkenazi, Sabra and Russian emigrant colonists. The former exploits labor and markets, while the latter dispossesses Palestinians. Netanyahu has discovered a formula for uniting quarrelsome Jewish parties, leaders and voters and for winning elections.

Moreover, Netanyahu has secured the financial and political backing of numerous overseas Jewish-Zionist billionaires. He has secured the unconditional support of tens of thousands of middle class Israel-First activists, academics and professionals who operate AIPAC and dozens of similar propaganda mills in Washington and Christian Zionists throughout the US. Netanyahu’s overseas backers ensure that the US government may grumble and criticize, but will never disrupt Netanyahu’s ‘plan’ of an ethnically pure ‘Greater Israel’ with Jerusalem as its ‘eternal’ capital. Obama may whine and talk to the press about ‘reconsidering US-Israeli relations’ but he has assured Israel and Netanyahu that military and economic ties will remain intact.

http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2015/03/31/the-roots-of-netanyahu-s-electoral-victo

http://8ch.net/pol/res/1609930.html

Manchu genocide against Dzungar Oirat Mongols

Quote:
Shiang, this is interesting and all, but the Manchus are not rich enough anymore to offer recompensation to the surviving Dzungars.

Are we going to have them be forever guilt-burdened with their genocides like how Germans are going to burdened with the Holocaust, anti-semitism or how whites in general for slavery?

Replace this with "I'm sorry I'm Manchu."
#NeverForgetDzungaria1755

http://historum.com/asian-history/83914-manchu-genocide-against-dzungar-oirat-mongols.html#post2079396?postcount=5

History is over-laden with atrocious crimes by one people against another throughout the centuries, exercising respective violent versions of what anthropologists today call ethnocentrism. The idea that "We are the People and everyone else is not" is endemic to world cultures and religions. But the extreme "Kill every thing that breathes" injunction as moral (and religious) policy is rare; after all, for even the most ruthless victor that which is taken alive has at least some economic, pleasure or productive value to the conqueror. The spiteful vanquishing of everything and everybody, repeatedly, in a holy book of all places, cannot be completely overlooked – as it always is – in the development of future peoples, world views, and civilizations that stemmed from it.

Arnold Toynbee, the well-known British historian, in arguing that religious "fanaticism" in Judaism has been inevitably passed to Christianity (and its notorious Crusades) and Islam (like its Holy Wars), had the audacity to openly attribute the ultimate cause of discriminatory suffering experienced by Jews throughout history upon their own heads.

http://holywar.org/jewishtr/18holo1.htm

Jewish Ethnocentrism is Biological


Quote:
Nope. National Socialism and Judaism are both vulgar and simplistic...Judaism is not some nuanced, primordial, rich cultural tradition...its a tribe of miscegenated gypsies collectively wallowing in their own myopia and defining their entire worldview in terms of "the goyim is trying to destroy us".

National Socialism is a knee-jerk, simpleton's reaction to modernity that posits the Jew as the source of all evils.

http://www.thephora.net/forum/showpost.php?p=105076&postcount=6

http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=8526

Given that ethnocentrism continues to pervade all segments of the Jewish community, the advocacy of the de-ethnicization of Europeans is best seen as a strategic move against peoples regarded as historical enemies. 

http://web.csulb.edu/~kmacd/books-Preface.html
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 1st, 2015 at 8:07am by vikaryan »  

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Multiculturalism is an anti-Western ideology
Reply #401 - Apr 1st, 2015 at 8:19am
 
Quote:
The Roots of Netanyahu’s Electoral Victory: Colonial Expansion and Fascist Ideology


Benjamin Netanyahu’s re-election makes him the longest serving prime minister in Israel’s history. His 20% margin of victory (30 Knesset seats to 24 for his nearest opponent) underlines the mass base of his consolidation of power.

Most critical commentators cite Netanyahu’s racist pronouncements; his rejection of any two state solution and his overt appeal for a mass Jewish voter turnout to counteract the ‘droves of Arab voters’ for his electoral victories. There is no question that the majority of Israeli Jewish leaders and parties support Netanyahu’s racist pronouncements and ‘no-state’ solution and joined him in a coalition government. But the larger issue is the positive mass response to Netanyahu’s call to action. Nearly three quarters of the electorate turned out (73%) to elect him. Moreover, Netanyahu has been elected prime minister for four terms: between 1996-99 and more recently 2009-20.

What is more, the opposition has not differed from the Netanyahu coalition regime’s Judeo-centric policies and pronouncements. In other words, ‘racist’ ideology per se is not what drives the Israeli majority to repeatedly support Netanyahu.

Jewish-centered racism is an integral and accepted part of Israel’s political culture.

http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2015/03/31/the-roots-of-netanyahu-s-electoral-victo

http://8ch.net/pol/res/1609930.html

Manchu genocide against Dzungar Oirat Mongols

Quote:
Shiang, this is interesting and all, but the Manchus are not rich enough anymore to offer recompensation to the surviving Dzungars.

Are we going to have them be forever guilt-burdened with their genocides like how Germans are going to burdened with the Holocaust, anti-semitism or how whites in general for slavery?

Replace this with "I'm sorry I'm Manchu."
#NeverForgetDzungaria1755

http://historum.com/asian-history/83914-manchu-genocide-against-dzungar-oirat-mongols.html#post2079396?postcount=5

History is over-laden with atrocious crimes by one people against another throughout the centuries, exercising respective violent versions of what anthropologists today call ethnocentrism. The idea that "We are the People and everyone else is not" is endemic to world cultures and religions. But the extreme "Kill every thing that breathes" injunction as moral (and religious) policy is rare; after all, for even the most ruthless victor that which is taken alive has at least some economic, pleasure or productive value to the conqueror. The spiteful vanquishing of everything and everybody, repeatedly, in a holy book of all places, cannot be completely overlooked – as it always is – in the development of future peoples, world views, and civilizations that stemmed from it.

Arnold Toynbee, the well-known British historian, in arguing that religious "fanaticism" in Judaism has been inevitably passed to Christianity (and its notorious Crusades) and Islam (like its Holy Wars), had the audacity to openly attribute the ultimate cause of discriminatory suffering experienced by Jews throughout history upon their own heads.

http://holywar.org/jewishtr/18holo1.htm

Jewish Ethnocentrism is Biological


Quote:
Nope. National Socialism and Judaism are both vulgar and simplistic...Judaism is not some nuanced, primordial, rich cultural tradition...its a tribe of miscegenated gypsies collectively wallowing in their own myopia and defining their entire worldview in terms of "the goyim is trying to destroy us".

National Socialism is a knee-jerk, simpleton's reaction to modernity that posits the Jew as the source of all evils.

http://www.thephora.net/forum/showpost.php?p=105076&postcount=6

http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=8526


Judaism and National Socialism are mirror images of one another.


http://www.thephora.net/forum/showpost.php?p=105045&postcount=2


National Socialism as an Anti-Jewish Group Evolutionary Strategy

The National Socialist movement in Germany from 1933-1945 is a departure from Western tendencies toward universalism and muted individualism in the direction of racial nationalism and cohesive collectivism. The evidence reviewed below indicates that National Socialism developed in the context of group conflict between Jews and gentiles, and I propose that it may be usefully conceptualized as a group evolutionary strategy that was characterized by several key features that mirrored Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy.

https://archive.org/details/NationalSocialismAsAnAnti-jewishGroupEvolutionaryStr
ategy
Back to top
 

genocidial_irony.jpg (26 KB | 51 )
genocidial_irony.jpg

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
|dev|null
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male
Re: Multiculturalism is an anti-Western ideology
Reply #402 - Apr 1st, 2015 at 12:51pm
 
Bump! Bump! Bump! Bump!

|dev|null wrote on Mar 9th, 2015 at 1:14pm:
vikaryan is there any other ethnicity or race other than WASP that you don't hate?  I'm just wondering, thats all... Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin


Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy

Back to top
 

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Multiculturalism is an anti-Western ideology
Reply #403 - Apr 4th, 2015 at 8:52am
 
Quote:
The biggest crime in the Western world currently, the British ruling class allowing Muslims to rape working class white British children, is currently a Protestant problem.

http://www.f**kfrance2.com/viewtopic.php?p=69385#p69390

The England That Is Forever Pakistan


Multiculturalism and Rape in Rotherham


Rotherham has the third-most-segregated Muslim population in England: The majority of the Pakistani community, 82 percent, lives in just three of the town’s council electoral wards. Voter turnout can be as low as 30 percent, so seats can be won or lost by a handful of votes — a situation that easily leads to patronage and clientelism.

Rotherham is solidly Labour; the last Conservative M.P. lost his seat a month after Adolf Hitler was elected the chancellor of Germany. The Labour politicians who governed Rotherham in the last decade came into politics during the anti-racism movement of the ’70s and ’80s. Their political instinct — and self-interest — was not to confront or alienate their Pakistani voters. Far easier to ally themselves with socially conservative community leaders, who themselves held power by staying on the right side of the community.

These dynamics help explain why so few spoke out about the culture that produced the crimes — a culture of misogyny, which Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, a Conservative politician who was raised near Rotherham, criticized in 2012, saying that it permits some Pakistani men to consider young white women “fair game.” It would be a brave leader, Pakistani or otherwise, who would tell the Pakistani community that it needed to address such issues, or that the road to progress required Pakistani parents to relax their strictures and allow their sons and daughters to marry out.

If working-class British Pakistanis had been better represented in the groups that failed them — the political class, the police, the media and the child protection agencies — it is arguable that there would have been a less squeamish attitude toward the shibboleths of multiculturalism. British Pakistanis may be held back by racism and poverty, but by cleaving so firmly to outmoded prejudices and fearing so much of the mainstream culture that swirls around them, they segregate themselves.

The grim fact of child sex abuse is that it is not limited to any country, community or creed — witness the cases of leading white television stars who have been convicted of the crime in Britain, and the experience of the Catholic Church in Ireland and America. Most Pakistani men, in Rotherham or elsewhere, do not, of course, turn to criminality or become child abusers. But Rotherham’s abusers found that their ethnicity protected them because they belonged to a community few wished to challenge.

What may seem like a story about race and religion, however, is as much one about power, class and gender. The Pakistanis who raped and pimped got away with it because they targeted a community even more marginal and vulnerable than theirs, a community with little voice and less muscle:
white working-class girls.


http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/16/opinion/multiculturalism-and-rape-in-rotherham.html

Friends of Rape: How Feminist Liberals Help Sex-Crime to Flourish

Which newspaper dictated the multi-culti, rape-friendly politics of left-wing councillors and social workers in Rotherham? Not the Daily Mail or the Times, but the feminist Guardian, that staunch opponent of sex-crimes and patriarchal oppression.

The Guardian cares so deeply about victims and the vulnerable that its website has special sections devoted to women, children, child protection, rape and domestic violence. But it was the right-wing Times “whose estimable reporting sparked the inquiry” into what was happening in Rotherham.

If there are people who should be put on trial and imprisoned or expelled from Britain for promoting crime on a massive scale, it isn’t anyone in the British National Party and other nationalist organizations. No,
it’s the politicians and journalists who have directly assisted a war of violence and rape waged by non-Whites against the White British
.

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/09/rape-rites-how-feminist-liberals-help-sex-crime-to-flourish/
Back to top
 

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Multiculturalism is an anti-Western ideology
Reply #404 - Apr 6th, 2015 at 1:41pm
 
Mein Kampf: The world’s most dangerous book?


Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf falls out of copyright in Germany at the end of 2015. What will happen when authorities can no longer control its publication and distribution? A new BBC programme examines the issues.

“They wanted to replace the Bible.” Whispering in a hushed room of the Bavarian State Library, rare books expert Stephan Kellner describes how the Nazis turned a rambling, largely unreadable screed – part memoir, part propaganda – into a central part of the Third Reich’s ideology.

As Mein Kampf comes out of copyright – meaning that, in theory, anyone could publish their own editions in Germany – a new programme on BBC Radio 4 explores what authorities can do about one of the world’s most notorious books.

http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?p=1321092

http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20150113-the-worlds-most-dangerous-book
Back to top
 

1399084811084.jpg (110 KB | 48 )
1399084811084.jpg

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 27 28 
Send Topic Print