Actually you won't be bombarded at all. Islam holds the world record in the terrorism stakes. Do get it right.
Not only that its religion supports it unlike Christianity. Which would make the perpetrator non Christian shock horror.

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 12^th, 2014 at 7:50pm:


Really, I can be and angry person like you and claim I am a buddhist and follow budda and it don't make it so champ. As much as you wish to portray yourself as knowing what you are talking about as usual you do not.

Of course not Brian but of course not. Why would anyone think you are angry. 

The disturbing set of photographs shown above has now been circulating via email, blogs and forums for several years. According to the explanation that accompanies the images, they depict an 8 year old child being punished under Islamic law for stealing bread from a market in Iran. The message claims that the images show the boy's arm being deliberately crushed by a car wheel as retribution for his crime, all in the name of Islam.

However, as is often the case with images that circulate cyberspace, things are not what they seem. While the photographs themselves are genuine, the event they show had nothing whatsoever to do with Islamic law and was not a punishment for stealing. In reality, the stunt was a street performance conducted for the entertainment of onlookers. The photographs were originally published on the Iranian news website Peykeiran. According to information published on the Little Green Footballs blog, a reader who contacted Peykeiran about the images received the following reply:

    It seems you have not read the text that came with the pictures. In irna there some who earn their bread by Maareke giry. In our case one of these maarke gir _ha had hired a kid to do those unhuman show.

A seventh image, showing the boy after the stunt, is generally left out of the protest message
The first photograph in the series shows a man talking into a microphone and this collaborates the claim that the event is part of a street performance. It appears that the microphone wielding "host" is explaining the stunt to onlookers.

Moreover, most versions of the protest message omit the seventh photograph in the series, which shows the boy sitting up after the stunt, apparently with no serious injuries. Thus, the claim in the message that the boy permanently lost the use of his arm is clearly untrue.