In my opinion the so called Judge is rightfully held to account else his peers will fall into the sweet state of do-nothing. How many cases of rape are caused by women rapists? It is usually always men, aka walking dicks, that come (sic) along and stand over somebody to get their jollies off - oftentimes causing stress and detriment that can last the victims life. In counterpoint there may be reason to say one should wash one's foul linen within the family in private at home. Whatever. Reading the article via the link one notes tre Colt family moved often, they intrinsically knew that they were wrong in the eyes of society about them whom usually don't sleep with their immediate nuclear family or cousins. This is a case of bizzare behaviour perpetuated by the menfolk and most likely where the females where coerced to believe what they were doing the norm. Seneca once wrote, "All my life I have been seeking to climb out of the pit of my besetting sins and I cannot do it and I never will unless a hand is let down to draw me up".

I think the relevant word is rape.

The judge's comments about how community values change over time is completely true.
I am old enough to remember back to a time when if a single girl became pregnant, she would often go into a home to have the baby then have it adopted out, to avoid the shame of neighbours or relatives finding out.
And that was only back on the late '60s and '70s. It was starting to change in the '80s, but single motherhood was still not highly thought of.

Look at where we are now, with people openly living together and some single women deliberately trying to get pregnant.

So attitudes do change, but I think the attitude to rape has actually gone the other way, with sexual assault now more in the news. Things a man may have gotten away with or that may not have been taken so seriously 40 years ago could now see a man up on charges. (think eg RH)

Having read the description of the family, it would be interesting to know if it was actually rape though, as it sounds a bit as if everyone was having sex with everyone else.

I would like to know how the rape charge came about-did the woman herself initiate it or did authorities push her into it after DNA tests?

I think incest will be one of the last taboos to fall, there are good reasons why it shouldn't be encouraged. The social taboos of thousands of years are there for a reason.

Incest pedophilia and bestiality are all sexual orientations which proves that sexual orientation was never an equal or human right but the homosexual activists obviously were the ones pulling for every sexual orientation to become legal by making up the two faced lie that sexual orientation is an equal or human right.

What does homosexuality have in common with bestiality, incest and pedophilia? They are all sexually defective.

The one sexual orientation that stands alone is heterosexuality because thanks to heterosexuality we even exist.

If it were up to homosexuality to sustain the human race we would have died off thousands of years ago for weakly being a race of sexually defective.

This judge however by trying to make incest legal is also encouraging more birth defects through where such sex leads so he is quite obviously in the wrong. But you can thank homosexual activists calling sexual orientation an equal or human right for that. I say that (Of the judges decision) with the exception of that perhaps if he is just doing what he feels necessary to point out the fact that sexual orientation never was an equal or human right. I already did contact all of them.

Come have a look at my new release here in the "Thinking Globally" forum and look for the title "World Becoming Aware of Homosexual Activist Lies" of which 214 parliaments etc. . 20 000 elected and appointed officials of Earth now have.

It will likely blow your mind how these homosexual activists have been using lies and deceptions to make fools out of all of you.

My pleasure

love

David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!

philperth2010 wrote on Jul 12^th, 2014 at 12:20pm:


Did the judge not apply the law as written?

Kytro wrote on Jul 13^th, 2014 at 8:11am:


Well, he made a ruling that prior conduct evidence not be admissible at trial. OK.

It is comments in his reasoning for the ruling for which he is under the hammer.

While it is true that some people in the community may believe that adult incest should not be illegal, I don't see the relevance of its reference in the trial situation where jury members decide on the FACTS presented in evidence.....personal view on our incest law forms no part of its charter.
   
Indeed adult incest has been removed from the statute books of some countries. Australia is not one of them.

I'm still scratching my head...crazy comments in a trial context.