Neferti wrote on Jul 17
th, 2014 at 9:56am:
I read it all.
And the body was in thick mud, with a lot of insect larvae and beetles on her, with a decomposition of a lot of soft tissue loss.
Palm and fingerprints of the left hand are intact, and most of the skin of the right hand is absent. All fingernails of the right hand are detached and on the left hand nails, fingers 1 and 5 are detached, while 2-4 are loosely attached.
So getting back to my main thought re: any dna or skin tissue relating to her husbands face, with the mud and insects and decomposition, all that is lost, isn't it?
Drowning is not ruled out, as the appearance of lungs is not typical of drowning, the report says, however, post-mortem changes significantly limit interpretation.
Then further down, drowning has to be considered a possible cause of death over a natural cause of death.
And then, mentions strangulation/smothering.
She could have still been alive when her body was pushed over the embankment, and either the tide washed her further along under the bridge, or she clawed her way there, as the report mentions it could have been the rising water that put her in that akward spot, or she crawled her way there, or some other person put her there.
There were no fractures to show she jumped off the bridge.
So much for finding his skin tissues under her nails from scratching his face.